He's a fascist.

This shit looks amazing

Why are you taking his phone calls in the first place? He’s just going to lie to you, there’s no point to it

The US Men's Hockey team response is a masterclass in how so many men would rather be quiet than push back against other men Did they cheer for the Women's team? Probably Will they defend the Women's team from misogyny? Not in public - because defending women is political but degrading them is not

strongly recommend preemptively blocking this guy on here. he aggressively name searches anyone wo criticizes him, jesse singal, or other transphobic journalists and posts screenshots with identifying info on twitter to encourage harassment

Including one bit of dishonest anti-trans trickery that we’ll report on this week. Stay tuned…

I feel like we oughta start putting "I watched the Braves on TBS growing up" in the same category of "I feel like I'm in the best shape of my life" with the way it's so common around this time of year lmao

Why would you ever give someone on BlueSky your real phone number? What benefit does that provide? You do realize you can do voice chat without a phone number, right?

Hit dog hollers archive.is/EbhdC

As is so often the case, this interview of former NYT editor Billie Jean Sweeney, by @davidforbes.bsky.social, is once again highly relevant to current events. Sweeney breaks down, in detail, how anti-trans bigotry's pushed from the very top of the company.

Part of the problem with Gavin Newsom is that he's a stupid asshole who listens to stupid asshole right-wing podcasts and invites those stupid asshole right-wingers on his podcast and all of this stupid asshole influence leads him to believe and say stupid asshole right-wing talking points.

"normal" continues to be the ultimate slur. all other slurs just denigrate one group, "normal" immediately denigrates literally everyone and everything not included.

pov you are wearing meta ray bans

Black filmmaker Jonte Richardson says he is stepping down as a BAFTA judge:

Here's the thing I will continue saying every time this came up: Kamala Harris did not mention trans people in her campaign. She went out of her way to avoid it. She dodged every question on trans rights. And then she still lost. So what Newsom wants is *open hostility* to trans rights

We have GOT to get these guys paying for the cost of powering this shit. If they had to pay the actual costs related to writing those little stories (lol) he’d be shitting bricks that it was wasting his money

This is the very same man that most of my timeline said was “taken out of context” when Black ppl felt he was culturally insensitive for his remarks in Atlanta lmao

@parkermolloy.com this shit fake too or what? You want to keep that energy about criticizing Newsom about real things he says, well here is he is again. Can’t wait to see you explain this away - or will you get mad about this one because it is focused on LGBT folks and not black folks?

There's this thing that will happen where people assume you came to what they think is an inaccurate conclusion because of incorrect information. And yet, many Black people saw the full video and still consider it offensive in context. So what now?

Yo we gonna have some people talking about how this shit was out of context too? Not gonna catch my ass defending Gavin Newsom

Parker will not stop this thread. If it was really just rage bait…. Haven’t you made your point already? Hit dogs and all that

I wish I loved anything as much as some people love finding excuses to argue that sometimes non-black people just have to use the n-word or else we’ll all die

this entire situation was crafted by the BAFTA hosts to create discourse and drive up the amount of press for their show. absolutely ghoulish behavior, they straight up used this guy's disability for shock value and directed it at two black men on stage to milk an intersectional oppositional framing

personally think it sucks that black people can’t even be like “wow it sucks and hurts and harms that what could have been a cool moment/night was derailed by slurs” without people telling them they can’t feel that way because it wasn’t on purpose. it is making me really mad to see!!!!

airing the BAFTA award ceremony on a tape delay, leaving in a slur, but editing out "free Palestine"?? that too is a choice, and an egregious one at that! archive.ph/YMhlK

knowing that nobody at the BAFTAs spoke to Delroy or Michael, that apparently there was a 'sorry if you were offended' apology, and the fact that the BBC took time to edit "free palestine" and not the slurs has made an already ugly no win situation much worse

Nothing in this thread is actually exculpatory and no, being pedantic about it isn’t helpful. I don’t really care. He is in Atlanta, that is a black crowd. A lot of white people making excuses for other white people this morning and it isn’t necessary.

I think what pisses me off the most is that every accolade or praise that is given to the cast and crew of Sinners comes with at least two events of bullshit and slanted articles. Those people have not been able to enjoy that beautiful piece of media without white ppl trying to ruin it.

Worst of all, it appears to be the only way the FBI targets people for investigations. It looks at Laura Loomer's little Jigsaw from Saw panopticon feed and determines who to target next. There is no professional or personal use case for being on Twitter in 2026. It's an engagement trap for racists.

The BBC have cut a 'Free Palestine' call from their 2026 Bafta coverage, despite not cutting a racial slur from a man with Tourette's syndrome

Not gonna get too into it because it is some real crazy shit… but I have to say I do feel differently knowing now that the BAFTAS kept the n-words in the broadcast but censored a pro-Palestinian statement does absolutely make me feel differently about it. That was a clear choice

Wait. The show was PRETAPED????

It is funny that a bunch of journalists felt the need to do a forum raid and it’s funny it didn’t work lol

This is in Atlanta btw, that’s Mayor Andre Dickens

I've repeatedly seen folks talking about bluesky users "moral judgements" or "moral condemnations," and I've got to be honest, it feels like the response of people with an unhealthy relationship to a substance when someone notes the problems with it: "you think you're better than me?!?"

Can't fuckin' believe I'm doing this but here goes: Twitter is a mind prison, a true jail of career advancement. I stopped posting on there and within months I became the CEO of The Onion and I'm not kidding. Went back on last year, felt worse, then left again.

I will admit Bluesky can be kinda annoying at times, and one of those times is when relatively prominent people come on here solely to insult the entire userbase over some silly drama

one of the main reasons i use this app over others is on bluesky im not contributing to kiddie porn production by simply opening the app and being one of the “daily users” used to generate revenue

*Trump voice* You know Gabby devale is a great journalist… a journalist with righteous politics… The way this website is treating her completely fair reporting—perhaps the fairest reporting anyone has ever seen—it’s disgraceful. This is a sad, failing website—an irrelevant joke of a website…

Btw, this is how twitter the way it is now gets people. It’s the reason everyone is pointing out that it makes you increasingly right wing. You often accidentally do things that prop up the right. When anyone points that out, you do this. Reframe it as actually they/you are righteous and etc.

I feel like they're always arguing two opposing points: 1. Bluesky is washed, nobody goes there 2. I get too much (annoying) engagement My guys, I'm not sure you want a social media site, you just want a fan club! That's a substack! Don't blame me because you're mad you're not popular!

"there's too few people on bluesky there's no point in hanging out here" i used to spend all day posting on web forums with 500 active users. IRC chats with 25 people total. even on twitter i cared more about a handful of group DMs with like less than 200 total people in them than the public TL

To be clear - journalists and other connected people absolutely have these group chats and that is how they are able to coordinate responses where they all have the same comment about the same post at the same time. I think it would be helpful to just call that out when we see that

They don't hate journalism, they hate modern journalists and the rancid culture they have made for themselves.

I can't speak for anyone else but the only people I ever encounter who feel the need to tell me they use twitter are journalists who are bitching and whining that they don't get enough attention on bluesky, so the alternative has literally never come up.

It's pretty funny that "journalist who is mad about not being treated like a very special boy" is basically a bluesky stock character at this point. Suddenly having to compete for attention with people who post good and having a total meltdown about it.

No one is on here to be relevant. That's exactly why you idiots can't enjoy a community. Everything is transactional with the pundit class.

Posts complaining about “this platform,” especially ones like this showing data are loser shit. Doesn’t matter what it is about it will always be lame. Who cares? I’m here to shitpost