you trust that your coauthors will hold their end of the bargain as you hold yours. if someone fails to play fair, everyone is responsible for the consequences regarding the outcome/publication. that doesn't make everyone personally a fraud. that part seems rather straightforward.

next time i come across a mega-study with hundreds of authors, i'll randomly select a subset of authors and quiz them about the papers they cite to ensure all of them have read all of the cited papers

Computational Psychiatry of Addiction

I have a similar experience. I am able to get the #Rstats code I want from Claude in just a few prompts, often in just one. It's not just that Claude has improved, it's also that I started using R in 2014 (I know what to ask) and I learned how to prompt effectively (I know how to ask).

absolutely wild to see people out here saying that it is responsibility of peer reviewers to check for hallucinated references. it is hard enough to persuade people to read articles and provide reviews. expecting them to spend hours cross reffing literature is unreal.

Students, if you’re thinking about dropping a note to that teacher or professor about what their class/project/mentorship has meant to you, but you worry it will be cringe or cheesy, let me just tell you they will coast on the fuzzy feelings prompted by that note for months, if not years

Feeling overwhelmed with all of this. LISTEN. Another Louisiana resident (Marshawn is the only name we have) testifies against the state’s racial gerrymander, speaking truth to power up and down the hearing room and predicts how this story will end. Speak your truth, fight and believe.

If you insist on conflating fascism with conservative or right-leaning politics, you will make it illegible, likely to your own detriment. Every Republican wasn’t a secret fascist waiting for Trump, many abhorred him even when he first emerged. But fascism absorbs people, including most of them.

The relevant portion of the Jason Collins discussion

OMG the DOJ lawyer just said presidential power has never been "circumcised." He was trying to say "circumscribed."

It feels wrong to dismiss their reports of their own experiences and identities out-of-hand, but I do think we urgently need a major sexological research program to help us understand how they got that way.

Philosophers of fiction, now is your moment

Many pittsburghers are asking

Recently, FamilySearch digitized and uploaded tons of microfilmed records, including many from 18th-century Massachsuetts. They're using some sort of AI to transcribe/summarize the handwritten documents. I've noticed that the AI strips out references to race and enslavement in 18thc documents.

I want to tie this stuff to the (decade-old, ongoing) discussion about "Nudges". There will a lot of "nudge" projects that made small incremental improvements to FAFSA - see this review by @dynarski.bsky.social www.povertyactionlab.org/sites/defaul...

"What fixing the FAFSA shows, even if it took much too long, is that administrative burdens are not inevitable. Barriers can be removed or lowered, when consistent advocacy and political will lead to needed legislative changes, and smart hard working public servants are given...support."

The good taxpayers of New York have given me a pair of Meta glasses because I am low vision disabled, and I seem to have used them more than a lot of people on here, so let me say a little about my experiences:

Are you interested in Shaping an Open Science Culture? Apply for this 2 year post-doc position at UMC Amsterdam. Joeri Tijdink is the PI, but you will work in a large interdisciplinary team (including me). werkenbij.amsterdamumc.org/en/vacatures...

Great question! The UMich data allows us to look at break outs by income tercile. The vibecession is *stronger* in high income populations. substack.com/home/post/p-...

My daughter's pithy summation: "Covid reminded people they lived in a society; and they hated it."

maybe worth adding that i think one reason that's the preferred style is because (especially among the precariously employed) there's a real fear of being perceived as unprofessional or unscholarly. the prevailing style probably minimizes that risk, which makes it in that respect attractive

The Dept. of Philosophy at Buffalo is launching a new PhD program in applied ontology.

We have all committed ourselves to a tremendous amount of work, but I'm excited to share this news.

Wikipedia coming out strong against Wittgenstein here with the claim that the world is the totality of things.

Leibniz be like

The 2020s information environment is very different from the 1980s information environment. It's a logical part of any vibecession explanation. But that's different from the argument that rejects the concept of a vibecession, saying instead that consumer sentiment is all due to material conditions.

One big vibecession theory will get a test. 1980s saw higher inflation than 2020s, yet 2020s consumer sentiment has been lower. An explanation for that from vibecession skeptics is that people were more used to inflation in the 1980s. So that predicts sentiment will rise now as things get worse.

A good cautionary tale for when someone claims that trusting data analysis done with an LLM is good because it’s “objective.” In this example, Copilot apparently decided to ignore the data it was given and just run with all the subconscious biases its (human-made) training data inevitably gave it.

Ok....*now* you can say real wages are falling.

Masculinity has a place, and that place is the sea.

we're super happy (and grateful to Kate for commissioning this, and @shiraminsk.bsky.social for wonderful editing)

Classic academic's wikipedia page arc

Sounds like a smart strategy to shore up a base that wanted to deport anyone who spoke Spanish.

An organization says that if you accept and agree to supervise one of their pre-screened applicants to your PhD program, you will receive a $60,000 "donation" for you to use as you please...

Atmospheric CO₂ of 340 ppm

What Hilbert said to Gödel

The funniest vibecession explanations are when people are like “There’s no disconnect from the real economy! You’re just looking at the wrong metrics!” and you’re like “Oh okay can you show me the right metrics?” and they’re like “No 🤪”

This tracks. AI is currently good at identifying technical issues, humans are still better at deciding whether those issues are important.

Back on bluesky for one (1) day and already reminded how much some parts of it suck. Real human people (even some leftists!) live in the south/midwest/red states. Saying we should all leave, or that blue states should boycott or invade (!) us, just shows you think of us as a cartoon, not as people

I'm genuinely surprised that anyone with right wing politics had any opinions about London at all.

I love this line. Like: ”Welcome to the Philosophy Department!” 🫡

ELMER FUDD: ahhhhhwwwaa..... da spice mewange.... found oenwe on da desert pwanet of awwakis

Michael Lewis's book The Fifth Risk is all about how the modern federal government was set up to reduce & eliminate a vast array of invisible problems, which it has done so well that it opened a door to wreckers who claim it did nothing, & are now making that lie true—with disastrous results

It is unimaginable that what is unimaginable is, in fact, imaginable.

Forgive me an annoying philosopher moment: pretty much everything you call unimaginable is in fact imaginable. Thank you for your time.

New on the Archive: Fan, Yao (2026) Regulating Strategic Track-Record Building: Institutional Remedies for Individual Expert Identification. [Preprint] https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/29526/