I wonder if the Columbia leadership realizes (or cares) how much blowback there might be from *within* the academy. This post, from a Cornell Law professor, is worth reading: 3d.laboratorium.net/2025-07-25-c...

This account is so obviously an AI bot it’s painful

“Viewed by CNN”? Yeah, I bet!

On X, Elon Musk Has Trained Grok To Be Overtly Anti-Semitic. But On Bluesky, Some People Say There Should Not Be Genocide Against Palestinians. Do American Jews Have Anywhere To Go? We Asked Stephen Miller Tomorrow In The New York Times

There are also these statements on the DC and Boulder attacks.

Zohran Mamdani is very much not an antisemite. Signed: Your very very Zionist and Jewish friend.

An actual opposition party would be climbing over each other to file articles of impeachment, listing his wrongs and talking impeachment nonstop at every occasion, encouraging protesters and showing up with them in the streets

this is as good as turning the Constitution off. If this is what congressional leaders are going to do when an executive just seizes power from the legislative branch, we do not have one.

What incentive does anyone in the world have to negotiate with the US on anything?

Schumer should introduce legislation tomorrow that bars the appropriation of funds to support military strikes on Iran without congressional approval. Anything less falls below the bare minimum. A resolution does not cut it. And Schumer - who likely supports war with Iran - knows it.

Unfortunately the answer is much dumber than that

The president of peace. (Picture of buildings in the Gaza Strip flattened by U.S.-made bombs unrelated.)

These were the only 3 famous people the NYT could find who ranked Andrew Cuomo

Take note of who is and isn't condemning Trump's attack on Iran. Down the line, they'll try to claim they were against it all along. Do not let them. Take notes and gather receipts.

Sex pest endorses sex pest. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/22/n...

How could they tell?

Mahmoud Khalil emerges from airport security with his wife Noor and newborn, legal team and Rep. AOC.

This framing exists because the decision is instantly obvious as one of the legal atrocities of US history, like Dred Scot, the 1870s Civil Rights Cases, Korematsu. The Times doesn’t want to say “The Supreme Court stripped rights out of law” so instead it says “Here’s why they did it to themselves”

Life hack: there is no way to make people love you by bombing them, and if they did love you bombing them will fix that. Because, you see, there's no such thing as an attack on someone's life so legitimate that they say ‘yes, I had that coming, thank you, father.’ ...

The Atlantic was a mistake.

I strongly oppose Israel’s attacks against Iran and Iran’s attacks against Israel. Both endanger civilians and risk all-out war. If you’re like my opponents and only condemning one side, I hope you find a spine and some moral clarity.

The main reason that a disproportionate number of Israeli citizens killed by Iranian missiles are of Arab origin is that the government has neglected to build bomb shelters in Arab cities Article from 2024; relevant today. www.haaretz.com/israel-news/...

I obviously don’t know the situation as well as Walz does and am not going to tell people to put themselves at risk. I will say, however, that if you shut down antifascist protests in an entire state because of fascist violence, you may provide an incentive for more violence. Be safe.

Note: It is more likely Netanyahu attacked Iran now because he feared another nuclear deal would be reached than for any reason having to do with recent advancements in Iran's nuclear program.

My primary opponent is openly supporting a war crime that brings the world closer to a nuclear meltdown.

A new visual report by Haaretz: "Rafah was flattened and wiped out. The city does not exist anymore. And it is definitely not the only one. The massive destruction caused by the IDF stands out even when compared with extreme cases in modern history."

Shows Jack Donaghy pitches when he's trying to get fired by NBC.

Opposing Andrew Cuomo is a non-negotiable for our membership. In light of today’s news that Jessica Ramos has endorsed Cuomo, our New York City CAP Council immediately voted to unendorse her on our ballots. @uawregion9a.bsky.social region9a.uaw.org/news/NYCMayo...

I'm Not A Zionist And I Think It Was Okay To Revive Hebrew. We exist

Would any supporters of Israel like to explain why, despite Israel not allowing journalists into Gaza, we have *significantly* more video evidence of Israel committing war crimes than we do of "Hamas hiding weapons among civilians"?

NYC residents are less than 3% of the population but you wouldn’t know it on BlueSky

My preferences: 1. Mamdani 2. A. Adams 3. Lander 4. Myrie 5. Stringer Current ballot: 1. A. Adams (best chance vs Cuomo) 2. Lander (second best chance vs Cuomo) 3. Mamdani 4. 5.

Welcome to my top 3 Blake

Welcome to my top 5 Blake

Adrienne Adams is genuinely very good

Adam Jentleson once berated me in a room full of his colleagues because I had an accurate story he didn't want to confirm to me because he didn't like how I would frame it and screamed that I couldn't possibly know what he knows and that my career would be over if I ran with it. Get over yourself.

Cuomo is running for mayor of a city that he has not lived in since the invention of internet-based email

Zohran Mamdani's policies ranked: Great: Eliminating bus fares; fast-tracking rent-stabilized housing construction; millionaire surtax; guaranteed repairs OK I guess: $30/hr min wage; Department of Community Safety Kinda dumb: Baby baskets, City owned grocery stores, Rent freeze

Far too many people are letting their political views become influenced by peer pressure or career anxiety (among people on the left, this pulls them to the center)

it's kind of funny that Einstein's descendants are probably stupider than the average person.

The only way SJP could have had advanced knowledge of the October 7 attack is if they were working in Netanyahu's office

if you know anything about katie miller i’m marisakabas.04 on signal

So *counting on fingers to be sure* the liberals on the Court could’ve stopped this if they’d wanted to.

I can't believe I'm being forced to agree with Justice Alito.

New York - Democratic Senate Polling: AOC: 54% Schumer: 33% Honan Strategy / May 18, 2025

The amount of throat-clearing FIRE has to do before defending Harvard is amazing given that they don’t do this when they are defending the far right