If you’re in Islington TONIGHT sogn up here for a FREE event… 👉 islington.greenparty.org.uk/events-calen...

THE (ABSOLUTE) STATE OF TRANSRIGHTS When: Friday, November 07, 7:30PM (expected to end around 8:45PM) Where: committee rooms 5 and 6, Islington Townhall, N1 2UD actionnetwork.org/events/the-absolute-state-of-trans-rights/

A really positive story, but does this sound familiar? “It just took me a long time to sort of peel back all of these protective layers and all of these masks that I wore to finally reach a place in my adulthood where I was stripped down to nothing.”

The Guarditerf producing quality investigative journalism like this only serves to expose the way it reports so much trans-related stuff superficially without looking behind the euphemistic government press releases and transphobic Contrived Authority output. They do it by choice. archive.is/qYKcv

The world’s first trillionaire initiated a move that has left more than half a million people dead, most of whom are children.

A Comprehensive Timeline of J.K. Rowling's Descent Into Transphobia From beloved children’s author to funding the legal battle to codify transphobia into law, we charted how Rowling became “queen TERF” Next time someone asks how JKR is transphobic - send them this!

"If the Greens overtake Labour in the polls, it will become harder for Labour to make the case that a vote for Polanski is a vote for Farage." www.newstatesman.com/politics/202...

Evidence that being "gender critical" has nothing to do with listening to women. Women have made it clear that trans women are welcome in the ladies' pond at Hamstead Heath, and now a small group of transphobes is going to court to override them.

“But to me, the time, energy and money spent protecting the definition of “woman” would be better spent advocating for the vital and crumbling network of organisations that actually protect women.” It is all very “Look at that trans woman over there!”, rather than the real issue which is cis men!

The fact that the global trans panic is helmed by conservatives who believe in the subjugation of women being a natural consequence of biology should have maybe been a clue

Politicians cutting domestic abuse shelter fundings and causing financial crisis where women are unable to leave abusers and end up murdered. Of course they jump on vilifying a scapegoat to act as if trans people are harming women when the harm comes them and austerity politics in Westminster

It was never about women's rights, it was always just about "ewww, trans people are icky, get rid of them" with a load of post hoc rationalisations on top to sweeten the bigotry for the general public.

“That is what makes it so morally bewildering to me that these culture war clowns are supposed to be a bastion of women’s rights. While they try to strip the dignity from a marginalised minority, frontline women’s services are on the verge of collapse.” 👉 archive.ph/ivFo2

💬 The City of London consultation on the ponds is open until 25 November. It’s important that women who support inclusion take part. Read our new piece to learn more and find out how you can have your say: 🔗 notinourname.org.uk/nion-women-rejects-anti-trans-narrative-at-kenwood-ladies-pond/ 4/5

They say they represent women’s interests. But the women who actually use the pond have already spoken for themselves - they want the ponds to be inclusive. This is why Not In Our Name exists - to show that most women believe inclusion, dignity, and respect go hand in hand. 2/5

🏊‍♀️The women who swim at Kenwood Ladies Pond have already made their decision. In 2024, almost 900 members voted to keep their trans-inclusive policy - a policy that has worked peacefully since 2019. Now, a small campaign group is seeking to overturn that democratic decision through the courts. 1/5

This conversation feels so hopeful. I feel hopeful that people as smart, articulate and kind as Jordan are committed to empowering the next generation. Here's our conversation on education and young men. I loved it! 👇🏼 youtu.be/PxSr45TLyuA?...

Several winners of Cycling UK 100 Women in Cycling prize decline award due to exclusion of trans women 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 road.cc/content/news...

We're taking on Reform. Join.greenparty.org.uk

It’s time for progressive movements to ask a serious question: how do we keep using platforms that actively undermine democracy and concentrate wealth in the hands of the very few, while claiming to fight for equality? cc @greenparty.org.uk @zackpolanski.bsky.social @owenjones.bsky.social

A magnificent piece of work. Comprehesive, revelatory & shocking. Journalism this good is always rare & precious but never moreso than at times like this. Latter day Lord Haw Haws being plumped, preened & delivered to your doorstep in plain sight by a Nazi-saluting goon news.sky.com/story/the-x-...

The BBC is rushing this hit job out the door. Remember, the licence fee means we are obliged, under threat of criminal sanction, to pay for its racism. Screw the BBC.

The BBC needs to publicly publish the names of the journalists and editors responsible for writing & editing articles. The BBC needs transparency over which individuals are abusing their professional positions to push their personal ideological biases!

They've changed it back again now, but changing a quote is a huge red flag. The BBC are repeatedly demonstrating that there are ideologues directly interfering with the meaning of stories they report relating to trans people, and this should be a far bigger deal than it is

The BBC is too pro trans, they say. The BBC meanwhile...

In the article reporting the BBC ECU’s rebuke of Martine Croxall for changing the wording of a press release, BBC News change the wording of the ECU’s findings report to add the phrase “trans ideology”. The unrepentant lack of professionalism from BBC News is, sadly, not surprising.

In this piece, admitting the BBC has broken its impartiality rules re. trans people, the BBC further breaks its impartiality rules by changing a quote saying "trans identity" to "trans ideology".

Starmer is just so shit on multiple levels. 😖

“That is what makes it so morally bewildering to me that these culture war clowns are supposed to be a bastion of women’s rights. While they try to strip the dignity from a marginalised minority, frontline women’s services are on the verge of collapse.” 👉 archive.ph/ivFo2

Newnham college will continue to welcome transgender women Newnham College faces legal challenge over this policy “Newnham College remains confident that they have a strong legal case regardless of the Supreme Court ruling,”

Ofcom has reportedly ‘dismissed’ more than 21K complaints against a series of anti-trans segments aired by TalkTV. Ofcom allegedly told legal group Good Law Project, that the Rupert Murdoch-owned television channel didn’t raise “substantive issues” in its anti-trans segments.

The Government needs to get serious about climate change. And it hasn't so we're suing. But this is the longest and most expensive legal letter Good Law Project has ever sent - and it involves a huge team of specialist lawyers. And we really could use your help. goodlaw.social/4cqi

We need to frame this as “Billionaires need to *take less* - framing it as they’re going to “pay more” implies that they’ve somehow ‘earned’ their billions - “taking less” (including taking less tax breaks) so that there’s more to go around for everyone else is grounded in equity narratives.

The Spectator are confused. It's not going to be cost free. Billionaires are going to pay more. Join.greenparty.org.uk

i love that he just says it. no skirting around, no ums and ahhs. we all know they should pay it, Zack is finally saying it

Here you go: www.ppu.org.uk/remembrance-... They also have them in Welsh, if you're so inclined!

It's not just about the messenger. You've got to have the right message.

It's back 😎 northwestbylines.co.uk/news/health/...

Teen Vogue changed my life and their politics team was doing incredible journalism comparable to very little other publications. I can't say I'm not disappointed with this decision. Sending y'all love❤️

This is a good idea. It removes X’s perceived USP that that is where the news happens without removing yourself from the eyes of audiences you may wish to persuade. I’m not on X any longer. But I can understand the argument to stay in a limited capacity. But Helen is right. Bluesky first approach.

Post first your ‘exclusive’ on independent platforms like Bluesky, Mastodon, or Spout Social - anywhere that isn’t run by a tech-bro billionaire with a political agenda. Then repost later on X, hours after your initial post.

@unroll.skywriter.blue unroll

It’s time for progressive movements to ask a serious question: how do we keep using platforms that actively undermine democracy and concentrate wealth in the hands of the very few, while claiming to fight for equality? cc @greenparty.org.uk @zackpolanski.bsky.social @owenjones.bsky.social

Incredible piece of data research and reporting on the undeniable biased and intentionally manipulated X algorithm. The article talks about how it influences the visibility of prominent, powerful political parties. Now think about how it impacts already marginalised & targeted trans people! 😣

Journalists and politicians need to finally wise up and pay attention. There hasn't been an excuse to remain on X for at least a year, but reporting like this *proves* that the website is a radicalisation engine for the the extreme right. Leave X, do it today. news.sky.com/story/the-x-...

The Telegraph’s latest “scoop” on BBC “trans bias” isn’t journalism. It’s propaganda designed to weaponise culture-war rhetoric and undermine trust in public broadcasting while casting anti-trans activists as silenced truth-tellers. 👉 archive.ph/b1Ski

Wes identifies himself as “progressive” to opportunistically jump on a bandwagon he thinks might benefit him. Everyone else identifies him as a c*nt! (See the ratio on his post! 😆) Wes is the UK Cuomo to Zack Polanski’s Mamdani!

This is the culmination of religiously induced transphobia. Burke thinks he’s a ‘martyr’ to ‘gender critical’ transphobia, when he’s just a radicalised, bigot! He’s just like all other ‘GC’ transphobic bigots, but just doesn’t hide it!

Wes identifies himself as “progressive” to opportunistically jump on a bandwagon he thinks might benefit him. Everyone else identifies him as a c*nt! (See the ratio on his post! 😆) Wes is the UK Cuomo to Zack Polanski’s Mamdani!

Grifter, backstabbing careerist, and slimy transphobic religious nut Wes Streeting pretending he's Mamdani's best friend to get ahead. Streeting is the same man who abuses trans kids after having previously worked for the Helena Kennedy Foundation and Stonewall.