We want to support Girlguiding and the Women's Institute to remain inclusive. We think the law is on our side, and we're offering to cover all their costs. But we need you to tell them how important trans inclusion is to you 👇

Record-breaking Ireland humble woeful England in Twickenham demolition job

Beautiful.

Wish I was at Twickenham today, but good enough to watch on the telly 🇮🇪

'The MHRA's rigorous trial of the efficacy of condoms - placed on the member post-coitus - concluded that their benefits were overstated. The Secretary of State for Health, Wesley Streeting, heralded the trial as exactly the sort of evidence-led medicine for which he had always advocated.'

Girlguiding and the Women’s Institute say that they have been left with no choice but to exclude trans people, even though they don’t want to. This is outrageous – and we want to defend them. Help us do that here🛡️👇 https://goodlaw.social/1t1a

Our new series traces the history shaping Trans+ rights in the UK - written by some of the UK’s most respected journalists including  @ludovicparsons.bsky.social, @jessothomson.co.uk and @sasha98.bsky.social 👇 Join 10,000+ readers: https://www.wearequeeraf.com/milestones/

Genius.

We want to support Girlguiding and the Women's Institute to remain inclusive. We think the law is on our side, and we're offering to cover all their costs. But we need you to tell them how important trans inclusion is to you 👇

The plan, quite obviously, is to restrict the age to 14 when it's too late for puberty blockers to do anything and then use that as evidence that they are ineffective. Transphobic policy based evidence making.

Streeting's email to Labour MPs - kicks off with a flat lie. Cass did not recommend a ban. In fact she recommended exactly the opposite to what Labour has done. (webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/202503...)

1) Ban medication being prescribed because you say there is insufficient evidence to support it, even though it's prescribed internationally 2) Say you're going to set up a trial to get evidence that it's safe and effective 3) Pause that trial getting evidence because of "unquantified risk"

Barristers, solicitors, retired judges, and other legal professionals - add your name to our open letter to the Prime Minister to oppose the government's plan to restrict jury trials. Sign your name ➡️ bit.ly/4kMn9DX #JusticeNeedsJuries

Very interesting decision from the SC. Was very obviously unlawful, but rare these days that the Court actually reaches that conclusion.

I actually think this is deeply human.

Bates Wells solicitors have written a blog on the outcome of our EHRC challenge, which (I would say) agrees with our analysis. bateswells.co.uk/updates/case...

No child should be forced to carry the name of a man who raped her mother. We’re asking the European Court of Human Rights to rule on whether this decision was lawful: https://goodlaw.social/fyxv

Interesting is see whether an unpaid trade envoy role will be a 'public office' for the purposes of Misconduct in Public Office. No more comments on this case from me now, and replies off.

They got Al Capone for tax evasion.

Every time I discover a new ELO track my life materially improves

Okay, this is quite outstanding from Bedford Council.

Written by some of the UK’s most respected Trans+ journalists including @ludovicparsons.bsky.social, @jessothomson.co.uk, @sasha98.bsky.social and Alexandra Diamond-Rivlin, it launches next month in March 👇 www.wearequeeraf.com/milestones/

Wembley Arena. Let’s go. 💚 I’m proud to be speaking alongside performances from Adam Lambert, Beverley Knight & so many more! It's a moment to stand in solidarity with our trans siblings. Because when any of us are under attack, we show up. Join us: www.ovoarena.co.uk/events/detai...

Please tick all that apply: - Happy Shriving - Ramadan Mubarak - Happy Lunar New Year - Happy Australia Are Out Of The World Cup

This is an amazing piece from Jess Davies. But we have a plan to fight back - if anonymous accounts have used image based abuse to try and silence you, chasing you across platforms, we'd love to hear from you.

The barrister Setu Kamal sued @danneidle.bsky.social for £8m for defamation. Representing himself in court, Kamal cited three cases that made Neidle’s case “untenable”. But, in a bizarre twist, it turned out that these cases were hallucinated by ChatGPT: https://goodlaw.social/n1cv

Cambridge University paid for my private diagnosis because waiting lists were so long and it was impacting my studies. It was rigorous, I had to bring in my childhood school reports. I had way more symptoms than needed for diagnosis. Now, despite this, I can't get medication because of shared care.

Henry Shelford, chief executive of charity ADHD UK: it is "hateful and cruel how badly the overall NHS treats people with ADHD”.

Blimey. Looks like Matt Goodwin, who seems to think the Handmaid's Tale is an instruction manual, is in the pay of an Orban think tank, funded by Russian oil money.

So good to see Trans+ Solidarity Alliance continue to be recognised for their amazing work!

"Look, it's okay for moderates to say they won't vote for someone because they're too progressive, but progressives aren't allowed to say they won't vote for someone for being too moderate/conservative"... for reasons. Uh huh. Sure.

Even if you fully intend to vote for whoever the Democratic nominee ends up being, there’s a huge difference between doing that quietly in November 2028 and loudly announcing it years in advance with zero conditions attached.

Exactly this. "I'll vote for whichever candidate has a D next to their name no matter what their actual policy positions are!" sends a message to the politicians that they don't need to care about what you want at all. It's wild that people keep volunteering their unconditional support.

We’re appealing to the High Court. But we can’t do it without you. Support our appeal here: https://goodlaw.social/m3oe

Hi everyone. As you know, I am our trans rights lead at Good Law Project. I have been working alongside a fantastic team on our challenge since May last year. But whilst what we have achieved is significant - there is still a lot further to go. If you can, please donate and help us keep fighting.

BBC celebrating having helped harass a woman out of her job.

Leave her alone you fucking ghouls. She did nothing wrong.

And once you understand why misogynists would say only men need be heard on women's rights you also understand why the BBC has decided only cis people need be heard on trans rights: their inherent inferiority means they are not worth listening to.

Just saw my job title translated in the French press and it's absolute fire: "responsable des droits des trans"

Feeling confused about the High Court’s ruling? Read our FAQs on where this judgment leaves us and what happens next: https://goodlaw.social/ioen

The High Court has made clear that the draft Code of Practice is wrong about the law. Make sure your MP tells the Minister it now has to be rejected 👇

We know the Code of Practice is wrong in law. But we need your help to make sure it gets sent back. Write to your MP with our quick and easy tool, here 👇

This framing from The Times – focusing exclusively on employers – I think means that even they have realised just how significant the High Court decision is when it comes to trans inclusion by service providers. Time for the Code of Practice to be sent back.

The High Court today confirms that the EHRC's draft code of practice got the law wrong and must be changed. Women's and men's toilets can be provided on a trans- inclusive basis for customers and service users.

Hi everyone. As you know, I am our trans rights lead at Good Law Project. I have been working alongside a fantastic team on our challenge since May last year. But whilst what we have achieved is significant - there is still a lot further to go. If you can, please donate and help us keep fighting.

We know the Code of Practice is wrong in law. But we need your help to make sure it gets sent back. Write to your MP with our quick and easy tool, here 👇

We've written to Bridget Phillipson to point out she's legally obliged to reject the EHRC's draft guidance The Government committed in its manifesto to “remove indignities for trans people”. We're asking that they take steps to protect the trans community & correct what the Supreme Court got wrong

"The latest ruling means that equalities minister Bridget Phillipson will likely ask the EHRC to redraft this guidance."

Here are our FAQs on what the High Court's judgment means. goodlawproject.org/resource/faq...