This weekend, the New York Times ran a story claiming Sierra Club’s values have diluted our mission. They couldn’t be more wrong. The list of their errors is too long for one social post, but we go over some examples in these slides.

The bigger fight? Buddy, I die without health care and your pals in the Senate — none of whom will ever go without access to lifesaving medical care — told me they were gonna fight so my premiums don't go up 50%. And then they folded.

Universal healthcare is complicated and difficult to navigate. To date, only 32 of the 33 developed nations have been able to implement it.

Yep. Has NYT devoted even *one* stand alone news analysis to the collapse of the MAGA coalition?

That Doug Jones, a legit civil rights hero, would go into this race an underdog against a football coach should scandalize everyone.

Trump is starving American children but at least he’s made sure that a convicted child sex trafficker is much more comfortable. www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

It is, and what goes unsaid is that the piece in question a) opened with one of the most blatantly racist ledes I’ve read in years* and b) was by Jeremy Peters, who for the last decade has functioned as effectively a Heritage Foundation-type operative inside the Times newsroom

For Christian nationalists, there’s only one approved brand of religion, and that is only one approved brand of Christianity

I wonder why the NYT is making an anti-woman full court press today. Probably nothing.

I know some of these women. They are the real deal. An inspiration to all of us (especially white moms) to stop being afraid and to get organized and raise our voices. abc7chicago.com/post/ice-chi...

Pretty wild that there apparently is zero recourse for a constituency when House leadership refuses to swear in their elected representative.

Throw every Chat GPT exec in prison.

Our fresh news roundup features insights from @jackjenkins.me, @fiona-ndre.bsky.social, @alejacorazonhm.bsky.social, @angeladenker.bsky.social, @davidgilbert.bsky.social, @kateshellnutt.bsky.social, @kenschneck.bsky.social, @wsuares.bsky.social, @lrj417.bsky.social, @sarahposner.bsky.social, & more!

LifeWise’s Big Red Bus Is Driving Thorny Questions about Church and State www.the74million.org/article/life...

talkingpointsmemo.com/tpm-25/tradi... Every single word of this, @sarahposner.bsky.social

'Unlearn the lies about women," BWIM preacher urges baptistnews.com/article/unle... 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Hundreds of thousands of people, dead because of a decision made by the world's richest man

There are no words for how evil this is

Shocking that these worries would come from a newspaper owned by <checks notes> the world's fourth richest man and executive chairman of a retailer that employs over a million people in the US

the NYC mayor's election is over but the WaPo's whining definitely is not

can't stop won't stop

WaPo editorial page: It is not our job to endorse a candidate in a national election Also WaPo editorial page: It is our job to complain repeatedly about a mayoral candidate in an entirely different city

Wow, sounds like Jeff Bezos is mad (from A Washington Post editorial entitled "Zohran Mamdani’s victory is bad for New York and the Democratic Party")

The goddamn nerve of Jeff Bezos' newspaper to talk shit about raising the minimum wage at a moment when workers at Jeff Bezos' online superstore -- who are paid so little half of them in one study were on SNAP benefits -- are going hungry. The fucking arrogance.

ethics.sjmc.wisc.edu/2025/11/06/q... #MustRead

Did Knee-Jerk Contrarianism Ruin the New York Times?

it's not complicated: some guys (who, somehow, remain influential and comparatively powerful) are feeling powerless again and are trying to make it anyone else's problem but theirs

"should women work" but it really means "should men have to ever answer to or even encounter women who are not their wives, offspring, and/or other servile figures"

Just an illustration of how lazy and shoddy Douthat's guests are: No, there isn't really much of a convo going on about changing the women's NCAA 3 point line, and the players don't want to. In fact, men shot 35% from 3 in all of the NCAA last year, and women shot 33%, so not a radical difference.

Broads: Are They Really People? Join us tomorrow at nytimes.com as Ross Douthat and a Neanderthal model we swiped from the Smithsonian investigate.

His questions and conversations rarely reveal any kind of honest inquiry, but instead are a way to push the boundaries of how one group of people ought to be acknowledged as inferior to another, and how the lesser group should therefore have fewer rights, in some very concrete way.

Douthat is a slimy creep, particularly on the subject of women, as he’s shown for a long time now. NYT editors are showing their asses when they publish and promote his “just asking questions” retrograde misogyny year after year.

Should women have rights? We go through the pros and cons bsky.app/profile/jess...

One thing you see in the 1940s and 1950s is that the posters emphasize procedural aspects of the program - don't lose your card! make sure your employer has the right SSN! adjust your name after marriage! - but the key purpose is "Don't Lose Benefits."

The Social Security Administration used to have an incredible communications arm, including even a film unit. This was crucial in helping people understand the program, and how it would work. From 1936, 1939. www.ssa.gov/history/puba...

compare to this to their very upbeat reaction to the 2021 elections

The individuals who are the “deciders” of “what is (is not) fit to print”: AGSulzberger, Kahn, Ryan, Lacey, Healy, Kingsbury+ escape much-warranted criticism behind the institutional mantle. We think NYT leadership needs to be named & shamed for their “product”. From democracywashing fascism to 👇

The question being asked by the NYT after an election that promoted MANY women to power. It’s not a question. It’s a comment. An attack.