Kennedy is a total disgrace. But what more can you expect from someone who is the "Saint Paul" of antivaxx? Someone who has no understanding of having an ethical clinical trial. doritreiss.bsky.social @joho.bsky.social @craigspencer.bsky.social @scottgottliebmd.bsky.social

“Make America Healthy Again” is simply code for letting ”unhealthy” children die of vaccine preventable causes.

From @cidrap.bsky.social www.cidrap.umn.edu/influenza-va...

This is indeed dangerously unethical. When will someone stop RFK Jr. from causing more harm to global public health? @doritreiss.bsky.social

This is an excellent analysis from @joho.bsky.social. It's time we ignore the antivaxx science denialists from @childrenshealthdefense.org.web.brid.gy & other crackpot mendacious intellectual pornographers who reject the wisdom of credible medical & legal experts.

I wish AAP success in this. @skepticalraptor.bsky.social's piece is worth reading. @doritreiss.bsky.social

Shifting many pediatric vaccines into the category of shared clinical decision-making means in many red states governors and legislators will be pressured to strip them from school-entry requirements. Vaccination rates could fall sharply with stark regional differences in protection against disease

Myself and @doritreiss.bsky.social on the antivaccine movement from 2018. direct.mit.edu/books/edited...

Sadly this is worth noting. We are seeing it already but it will get worse, a lot worse, before it gets better. @doritreiss.bsky.social

This is worthy of note from @pauloffit.bsky.social.

I Was Wrong About RFK Jr.: he's not even a broken clock; he destroyed U.S. leadership in global health, and ruined our ability to trust our health agencies. He's done nothing right. via N. Adam Brown @medpagetoday.com www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/pres...

20 years of KITZMAS! Take this quiz and learn more about the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial that kept non-science "intelligent design" out of the science classroom. https://ncse.ngo/kitzmiller-trial-quiz #historysky #kitzmas

What's eating me the most, is RFK jr getting his hooks into these people SO fiercely. It's so bad that even parents of an unvaccinated 6 y/o who DIED from Measles, were STILL against the vaccine when interviewed by CHD. 😠

Congratulations to @nilese.bsky.social for the publication by the @paleosoc.bsky.social's journal Paleobiology of the 50th anniversary punctuated equilibrium symposium organized by Don Prothero & held at the 2022 GSA meeting. @bruceslieberman.bsky.social @andrejpaleo.bsky.social

This flu is hitting Manhattan hard (New York, NY) but it seems Trump & RFK Jr. don't care. Maybe they should.

This is worthy of note from @drpanmd.bsky.social.

This is well worth reading even if it's "through the lens of a classic science fiction film". Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have caused much damage to federal science and medicine.

@michaelemann.bsky.social & @peterhotezmdphd.bsky.social's "Science Under Siege" is one of the most important books published in recent memory, especially this year It is a timely look at what happens when science is attacked, ignored & discredited. It should be required reading for most Americans.

You know what, shitbird? I have an idea. What about a VACCINE? There are several in late stages of development. Will you promote them so we can get “children back into the woods” as you say?

So @jeneeninterlandi.bsky.social is on the @nytimes.com editorial board. She has been a voice of reason for many years at the paper (as have many of their health/science reporters) on infectious diseases. This is a great piece from her to close out 2025. www.nytimes.com/2025/12/30/o...

The health of Americans is at risk as those in power abandon evidence and process, and elevate anecdote and rhetoric in their place. Excellent article (if sad to read) www.statnews.com/2025/12/03/a...

A spectacular look back at Kitzmiller v. Dover, from Witold "Vic" Walczak.

In which I describe the links between Trump, creationism, ID, Christian Nationalism, and the book at the centre of the case; fear that the judgement will be undermined or, worse, bypassed; and show that this book contains errors of scientific reasoning that would disgrace an undergraduate.

This is a succinct, intriguing look at what Wilde thought about Darwin.

Sadly this is worthy of note.