Let's simplify: the government is arguing that once the money is spent, it can't be unspent (and that would be horrible). But the hungry can't eat tomorrow (and that's not as bad). That is the contention. abcnews.go.com/US/snap-appe...

Mine for ABC tonight. What's at stake in high-profile Supreme Court case on tariffs: ANALYSIS abcnews.go.com/US/stake-hig...

James Sample, a constitutional law expert at Hofstra University, said said that Trump's playbook appears to be straight out of Project 2025 ... [and that] "the purpose of a blitzkrieg is to overwhelm the opposition."

No. Not an opinion; not a debate; just a clear fact. No.

Thank you @jamessample.bsky.social for sharing your expertise and speaking up about what our Constitution requires.

A snippet reacting live to Governor Hochul’s speech. This clip focuses on Hochul’s dramatic characterization of a “grave threat from Washington.”

“When - ever - has Donald Trump given gifts without expecting a return on investment? What’s the return on that investment in terms of what Mayor Adams is going to give him?”

My rather banal thoughts on Bondi, Gaetz, and the tension of representing the nation, the law, and an often lawless President-elect. youtube.com/watch?v=_RTm...

www.salon.com/2024/11/19/a... “[A] delay in sentencing is not, nor should it be perceived to be, a prelude to a dismissal,” Sample told Salon. Sample noted that winning an election “should not mean disrespecting another important part of our democracy — the jury trial.”

I really don't get how Democrats can be handed the easy layup of "Republicans are uniting to suppress the underage sex trafficking report about an unliked and unqualified nominee" and decide the best thing to do is minimize its importance.