Zoe Robinson
@zoerobinson.bsky.social
📤 385
📥 376
📝 40
Law Professor
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Alan Elrod
3 days ago
Use the map in Virginia. Then, if you get control of Congress, be ruthless. Block everything. Do impeachments. Run investigations. Then in 2029, expand the Supreme Court, make DC a state, expand the House.
add a skeleton here at some point
7
268
81
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Adam Bonica
5 days ago
The Trump-IRS settlement talks are blatant corruption being laundered through the legal system in broad daylight. A president suing his own government. Kleptocracy usually requires some effort to hide. Resist the temptation to normalize this. Authoritarians have routinely been overthrown for less.
9
364
120
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Eddie Yang
6 days ago
New paper in Nature. The more a government controls its domestic media, the more it dominates AI training data, the more pro-regime outputs we get from AI. By scraping the open web, LLMs are unwittingly laundering state-coordinated narratives into seemingly objective answers.
19
627
362
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen
6 days ago
My new one
@slate.com
: Why is John Roberts in a Rush All of a Sudden?
slate.com/news-and-pol...
55
1603
510
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Jamal Greene
8 days ago
As Justice Sotomayor's dissent notes, the district court's finding of unconstitutional discrimination is unaffected by Callais. But if the dist. ct. now reinstates that finding on remand, the state will run to SCOTUS and say Purcell forbids the court to do so. You can guess what happens next.
add a skeleton here at some point
9
707
175
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Tyler McBrien
9 days ago
🚨 NEW TOOL for U.S. legal journalists ⚖️ I turned
@allyjar.bsky.social
's incredible crowdsourced Google doc on accessing state court records into an interactive map. Check it out and let me know about any errors, missing information, or ways I can improve this thing (link below)
14
747
349
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Maggie Blackhawk
11 days ago
I dream of a day when the legal academy spends as much attention to congressional and other legislative reform, than they spend debating whom among us is properly critical of the Supreme Court. Reforming Congress is equally (or more) important than rethinking Supreme Court practice and authority.
add a skeleton here at some point
2
80
28
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
G Elliott Morris
11 days ago
A very Strength In Numbers-coded article today: It looks like Republican Supreme Court justices made a very rudimentary, but willful, statistical error in their effective invalidating of the VRA in the Callais decision.
www.gelliottmorris.com/p/2026-05-08...
loading . . .
The simple statistical error Republican Supreme Court justices used to gut the VRA
The Court says vote dilution can be proven only after "controlling" racial polarization for partisan polarization. This is a nonsensical and impossible test
https://www.gelliottmorris.com/p/2026-05-08-simple-math-error-scotus-callais-vra
43
1128
503
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Chad Oldfather
12 days ago
Motivated reasoning, naive realism, and the resulting bias blind spot are powerful, powerful drugs.
add a skeleton here at some point
0
1
1
Pre-ordered this, looking forward to reading!
add a skeleton here at some point
12 days ago
0
0
0
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Liberal Currents
12 days ago
"Our screens are two-way, yes, but we can easily forget that the people on the other end exist as more than characters for our enjoyment. The degradation and humiliation rituals of reality television now play out across our social media feeds."
www.liberalcurrents.com/the-parasoci...
loading . . .
The Parasocial Style in American Politics
Our screens are two-way but we can easily forget that the people on the other end exist as more than characters for our enjoyment.
https://www.liberalcurrents.com/the-parasocial-style-in-american-politics/
0
15
4
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Steve Vladeck
13 days ago
We live in a time dominated by deeply unserious people making deeply unserious arguments in support of tragically serious results that serious people would have both avoided and known to avoid.
71
4480
1079
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen
13 days ago
Jamelle Bouie: “John Roberts Believes in an America That Doesn’t Exist”
electionlawblog.org?p=155957
loading . . .
Jamelle Bouie: "John Roberts Believes in an America That Doesn’t Exist" #ELB
NYT column: For the Roberts court, however, these districts are little more than a “racial entitlement,” to borrow a phrase from Justice Antonin Scalia. In the court’s view, you may have the right to ...
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155957
4
52
12
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen
13 days ago
Hardline Conservatives Including Justice Alito Really Do Not Like Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson Speaking Truth to Power
electionlawblog.org?p=155951
Count me as all the way with KBJ.
loading . . .
Hardline Conservatives Including Justice Alito Really Do Not Like Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson Speaking Truth to Power #ELB
Witness the recent attacks. Count me as all the way with KBJ.
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155951
1
37
14
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Adventurism
13 days ago
Can't fix racist maps because the election is only a year away, but you can stop an election after voting starts to make the maps more racist. Good thing racism is over. 🤬
3
409
107
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen
15 days ago
Norm Ornstein: “SCOTUS’s Brazen Power Grab Guts Voting Rights”
electionlawblog.org?p=155877
loading . . .
Norm Ornstein: "SCOTUS's Brazen Power Grab Guts Voting Rights" #ELB
Norm at The Contrarian: Now to Article III. The Framers did not expect that the judiciary would usurp the powers of the first branch. They created a Supreme Court and gave Congress power to establish ...
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155877
0
8
6
#historyandtradition
add a skeleton here at some point
16 days ago
0
0
0
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen
17 days ago
“Who Will Stand Up to the Supreme Court Justices?”
electionlawblog.org?p=155848
loading . . .
"Who Will Stand Up to the Supreme Court Justices?" #ELB
Nikolas Bowie & Daphna Renan NYT oped: With its decision this week in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court gutted a core part of the Voting Rights Act, Congress’s landmark prohibition on voting rul...
https://electionlawblog.org/?p=155848
0
22
5
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Niko Bowie
17 days ago
By gutting the Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court is killing the Second Reconstruction. The first Reconstruction shows how Congress should respond. Me and Daphna Renan in the NYT on the tools we have to save democracy from a hostile Court.
loading . . .
Opinion | Ruling by Ruling, the Supreme Court Is Undoing the Civil Rights Movement
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/02/opinion/supreme-court-voting-rights-act.html?unlocked_article_code=1.fVA.2nfN.F6RqiLMzeDvi&smid=url-share
42
2140
744
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
𝕊𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕒𝕖 𝔾𝕦𝕣𝕝
19 days ago
Hillary was right about everything.
794
20847
5481
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Tom Clark
20 days ago
These figures are *crazy.* And, yes, that's a technical term in the study of judicial politics.
add a skeleton here at some point
1
7
2
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Dare Obasanjo
20 days ago
American Black women now have fewer voting rights and reproductive rights than their mothers did at the same age. Progress isn’t a straight line, indeed.
loading . . .
The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Just Issued the Worst Ruling in a Century
This evisceration of the Voting Rights Act requires us to take SCOTUS reform more seriously.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/04/scotus-voting-rights-section-two-ruling-history-worst-century.html
38
2694
1317
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Rachel Shelden
19 days ago
I don't think it's a coincidence that lots of folks are publishing books this year that explain/contextualize this
#SCOTUS
& the current moment. Some to look for (& if you've got one I've missed, pls add!). Mine, the Political Supreme Court, will be out in October 1/
uncpress.org/978146969713...
loading . . .
The Political Supreme Court
Today’s Supreme Court justices bristle at the label “politicians in robes,” insisting that they operate above the fray of partisan politics. But for th...
https://uncpress.org/9781469697130/the-political-supreme-court/
1
81
38
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Ida Bae Wells
20 days ago
We must understand that the Voting Rights Act was not merely about ensuring Black Americans rights, it was about democratizing America. This ruling is not just a decimation of Black rights and Black Americans’ ability to have representation, it is a fatal blow to multiracial democracy.
129
10045
3662
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen
20 days ago
My New One at Slate: “The Supreme Court’s Conservatives Just Issued the Worst Ruling in a Century; This evisceration of the Voting Rights Act requires us to take SCOTUS reform more seriously.”
@slate.com
slate.com/news-and-pol...
72
2141
833
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Laura Portuondo
20 days ago
Please ignore that "Racism is Over" talking point undermines "there is nothing worse than considering race" talking point.
add a skeleton here at some point
0
3
2
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Steve Vladeck
20 days ago
"I dissent because Congress elected otherwise. I dissent because the Court betrays its duty to faithfully implement the great statute Congress wrote. I dissent because the Court’s decision will set back the foundational right Congress granted of racial equality in electoral opportunity. I dissent."
add a skeleton here at some point
45
2656
985
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Kyle Griffin
20 days ago
Justice Kagan: "I dissent. The Voting Rights Act is—or, now more accurately, was—'one of the most consequential, efficacious, and amply justified exercises of federal legislative power in our Nation's history.'
88
7266
2271
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Jonathon Booth
20 days ago
The result of Callais will be that black and latino voters will be prevented from electing representatives of their choosing at every level of government.
1
4
6
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Micah Schwartzman
26 days ago
If you’re a law professor thinking about reposting the claim that the Unite the Right rally was staged or faked, I’d encourage you to read the transcripts from Sines v Kessler. I know they run several thousand pages of testimony from the organizers, but they’re easily accessible and linked below.
17
388
111
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Rick Hasen
27 days ago
To those complaining about the Democrats' partisan gerrymander in Virginia: Congress has the power to ban partisan gerrymandering in congressional elections under its Article I, Section 4 powers. So far Republicans have been almost uniformly opposed. Is this going to change now?
5
133
30
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Gabriel Malor
26 days ago
There is a WILD ONE out of the 8th Cir. today about a man who stole another man's identity 30 years ago, lived all those years under the other man's identity including getting married and having a kid, who then got the other man prosecuted for identity theft.
ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/26/04...
44
654
233
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Micah Schwartzman
28 days ago
CA5 rules that there is no secular purpose requirement under the Establishment Clause. So when individuals act for religious reasons, their actions are treated as religious, triggering exemption claims; but when the state acts for religious reasons, its actions are ... well, nothing to see here ...
loading . . .
The Asymmetry of Religious Motivation | Yale Law Journal
The Supreme Court’s religious freedom doctrine treats religious motivation asymmetrically: with respect to free exercise, religious motivation suffices for...
https://yalelawjournal.org/supreme-court-collection/the-asymmetry-of-religious-motivation
2
25
11
Delighted that my article "Supporting Comparative Studies of Judicial Behavior: Introducing the Australian High Court Database" with
@palesl.bsky.social
, Tonja Jacobi, and Russell Smyth is now published in the Journal of Law and Empirical Analysis, available here:
tinyurl.com/859cdpa2
1/3
loading . . .
Supporting Comparative Studies of Judicial Behavior: Introducing the Australian High Court Database - Pat Leslie, Zoë Robinson, Russell Smyth, Tonja Jacobi, 2026
Comparative research on law and legal institutions depends on high-quality data infrastructure. This article introduces the Australian High Court Database—a new...
https://tinyurl.com/859cdpa2
29 days ago
1
4
1
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Jamal Greene
about 1 month ago
Most striking to me about these memos is the radically different assessment of the harm imposed by the president not being able to pursue his initiatives. Over the last 15 mos., that harm has in numerous cases been treated as almost per se serious and irreparable. Here, it gets no analysis at all.
add a skeleton here at some point
38
2475
682
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Eric Segall
about 1 month ago
John Roberts has destroyed the Voting Rights Act, ended affirmative action, implemented the unitary executive, used the shadow docket to further GOP interests, changed the first amendment to transform free exercise into religious supremacy, and end the establishment clause. Hubris all the way down.
4
39
17
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Alicia Bannon
about 1 month ago
Public confidence in SCOTUS has plummeted. There are many reasons for that, but a shadow docket that seems plagued with motivated reasoning & double-standards certainly isn't helping. Ultimately, public trust has to be earned. /fin
www.brennancenter.org/our-work/res...
loading . . .
Public Polling on the Supreme Court
The data includes sentiment on the Supreme Court itself and reform proposals.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/public-polling-supreme-court
2
21
4
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Jen Taub
about 1 month ago
"In public Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. has cultivated a reputation for care and caution.The papers reveal a different side of him.At a critical moment for the country and the court the papers show he acted as a bulldozer in pushing to stop Mr. Obama’s plan to address the global climate crisis"
add a skeleton here at some point
10
149
69
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Ellie Margolis
about 1 month ago
Time for your periodic reminder not to sleep on state constitutions when making civil rights claims. Many states have broader protection than the U.S. Constitution offers.
add a skeleton here at some point
0
32
13
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
David H. Gans
about 1 month ago
My latest
@slate.com
tells the story of the Black Convention movement during Reconstruction & how it shaped the Reconstruction Amendments. With three huge 14A cases awaiting decision, it's time to heed Justice Jackson's call for a more inclusive history.
slate.com/news-and-pol...
loading . . .
The Supreme Court Has a Chance to Revolutionize Its Approach to the Law
In the next few months, the Supreme Court will issue a spate of potentially landmark rulings on the meaning of the Reconstruction Amendments.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/04/supreme-court-black-conventions-ketanji-brown-jackson.html
1
9
4
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Scientific American
about 1 month ago
A man with HIV has gone into remission after receiving bone marrow from his brother, who has a rare mutation that prevents the function of receptors that HIV binds to
loading . . .
Person functionally cured of HIV after bone marrow transplant from sibling
A man with HIV has gone into remission after receiving bone marrow from his brother, who has a rare mutation that prevents the function of receptors that HIV binds to
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/person-functionally-cured-of-hiv-after-bone-marrow-transplant-from-sibling/
47
2476
675
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Tanner Allread
about 1 month ago
Honestly still in shock by its placement, but my article (and job talk paper), “Indigenous Constitutionalism,” is officially out in the Harvard Law Review. A brief thread on this project🧵
harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...
loading . . .
Indigenous Constitutionalism - Harvard Law Review
By standard accounts, there are fifty-four constitutions across the federal, state, and territorial governments of the United States. But in fact, there are 230 other governmental constitutions that currently govern peoples and territories within the United States. These constitutions not only flow from a sovereignty that existed prior to the United States but also came out of a legal movement that asserted its independence from both the U.S. Constitution and state constitutions. This Article tells the story of these constitutions — the constitutions of Native nations.
https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-139/indigenous-constitutionalism/
16
228
70
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
G Elliott Morris
about 1 month ago
NEW: Donald Trump is underwater with registered voters in **135** GOP-held House and Senate seats. His approval is <45% in 44, including 10 senators. Should be a warning for Republicans in Congress weighing electoral cost of Trump's war and crazy tweets.
www.gelliottmorris.com/p/2026-04-07...
loading . . .
New polling: Trump is underwater in 135 GOP House and Senate seats
New local polling estimates show Trump is unpopular even in deep red districts, as calls for war powers reform and impeachment swirl in DC
https://www.gelliottmorris.com/p/2026-04-07-trump-approval-gop-house-senate-seats
32
1318
438
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Ryan Goodman
about 1 month ago
“Acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population are prohibited.” Geneva Convention Additional Protocol I and Department of Defense Law of War Manual, § 5.2.2
123
3816
1443
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Sherrilyn Ifill
about 2 months ago
LISTEN. Thank you, Cecellia Wang.
loading . . .
42
2721
610
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Leah Litman
about 2 months ago
may this define her for the rest of her life. she was willing to stoop this low and still got fired. girl, bye.
1415
37811
9730
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Bailey Barnes
about 2 months ago
My article, Factual Immunity, is forthcoming in the Minnesota Law Review. I argue that, alongside qualified immunity, some courts in constitutional tort suits employ what I call factual immunity by crediting officer testimony & discounting plaintiffs’ stories at summary judgment when QI is raised.
2
23
12
This looks genuinely terrific, cannot wait to read.
add a skeleton here at some point
about 2 months ago
1
1
0
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Maggie Blackhawk
about 2 months ago
Friends, again with respect because this is a complex issue: children born to citizens of tribal governments do not have constitutional birthright citizenship under many, if not most forms of constitutional argument and authority (incl. Supreme Court precedent relied upon in this case)./1
add a skeleton here at some point
35
665
226
reposted by
Zoe Robinson
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy
about 2 months ago
I usually don't post on April 1. But the Supreme Court is considering birthright citizenship and apparently the President is giving an address about Iran. So.............. good luck to us all.
2
21
6
Load more
feeds!
log in