We have recently published a paper introducing the Journal Editors Discussion Interface (JEDI, @dpjedi.org) in IASSIST Quarterly (@iassistdata.bsky.social) ✨ doi.org/10.29173/iq1...

It's tomorrow! Make sure you're registered and join us for this great discussion! #SciPub #JournalEditors #OpenAccess

Want to know how editors balance independence with publisher demands? Join us on Jan 30 to discuss challenges and strategies for navigating the complex dynamics between journal editors and publishers — or ditching your publisher altogether! Register: is.gd/3x1XzE #SciPub #JournalEditors #OpenAccess

Want to know how editors balance independence with publisher demands? Join us on Jan 30 to discuss challenges and strategies for navigating the complex dynamics between journal editors and publishers — or ditching your publisher altogether! Register: is.gd/3x1XzE #SciPub #JournalEditors #OpenAccess

Submit your metascience preprint and we will get it reviewed, and you can then take those reviews to journals, or just use them to improve your work prior to submitting to a journal.

Disappointing decision by Clarivate to use its status to attempt to squash innovation in science publishing. I was asked to comment on behalf of ASAPbio for a journalist's write-up of the situation, but my quote got cut. I'll share it here instead (below).

We're getting ready to launch MetaROR and make peer review faster, more transparent, and more efficient 💪 Join us for the official launch of MetaROR, a new open platform for reviewing and sharing metaresearch operating with an innovative publish-review-curate model. Launch Events ⬇️

A group of @asapbio.bsky.social Fellows & I have just posted a white paper with guidelines on adopting preprint friendly policies for various institutional stakeholders (individual PIs to hiring and promotion) We'd love feedback and input: zenodo.org/records/1398... #preprints #Scipub #AcademicSky

Hey #AcademicSky #EpiSky & friends: What would you say is the MOST IMPORTANT function of a scientific, academic journal? (in 1-2 words) Here's how our Peerspectives peer review training course participants responded during today's kick-off lecture #peerreview #scientificpublishing #publishorperish

New blog post I cobbled together for the Bristol Reproducibility Network Ethical Academic Publishing: How to Make Academic Publishing Fairer, More Open and Less Wasteful openresearchbristol.blogs.bristol.ac.uk/2024/09/23/e...

Shout out to #UniversityOfSussex for a great overview of #openpeerreview on their site: www.surrey.ac.uk/library/open... #openaccess #openscience #peerreview #academia

We're excited to announce a major update to the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines—TOP 2025! These guidelines streamline research practices and provide greater clarity around openness in research. The preprint is now available. Your feedback is welcome! www.cos.io/blog/new-pre...

Know when peer review at scientific journals began? Check out the latest @reproducibilitea.bsky.social podcast episode, where first-time host @qsaikia.bsky.social and I are joined by @jacoates.bsky.social from @asapbio.bsky.social to discuss how preprints and preprint review can accelerate science!

The ancient Q of paying for #PeerReview resurfaced on 💙☁️, most recently with the antitrust lawsuit against publishers, & so I thought is a good moment to re-vamp my (X)🧵 on the 450 Movement. Before you start: read the post from James Heathers #AcademicSky 1/ jamesheathers.medium.com/the-450-move...

Coming up today and tomorrow: two sessions on reproducibility at #FSRDC2024 #dataeditortips hosted by University of Utah in Salt Lake City Sept 12 and 13, 2024! Join us, first session is this afternoon! rdc.nexus.utah.edu/2024-fsrdc-c...

JEDI is an online community for journal editors across the social sciences focused on increasing open science policies, practices, and procedures at journals. Here's our new preprint introducing @dpjedi.org and summarising some data from the first two years! doi.org/10.31234/osf...

An #EditorialQuestion: how do you deal w/ a senior author who insist on insulting editorial staff in every email to the journal for no reason (and in this case, I literally mean no reason) while keeping all their student co-authors in cc #OverlyDisgruntledEditor #ScientificPublishing #AcademicSky 1/

Some cool new tools in here for making retractions more transparent! #ScientificPublishing

Journal fees for open access are becoming obscene. But what are we, scientists, paying for? I made a simple plot with journals in my research area(s). Clearly, we are paying for prestige: a shockingly clean correlation between the impact factor and journal fees

Many interesting points about our current #AcademicPublishing system in this thread!

Your morning read: New editorial with @jnfrltackett.bsky.social , @oliviajkirtley.bsky.social , @heatherurry.bsky.social , and Tess Neal on our experiences managing open science at Clinical Psychological Science. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Didn't know this paper... >300 people refereed the same econ paper, with author listed as 1. an early career scholar 2. anonymous 3. a Nobel laureate (from same university as 1) Recommendations: 65% reject for early career scholar, 23% reject for Nobel laureate 😑 www.pnas.org/doi/epub/10....

What are some journals in your field that allow for the publication of data papers or similar data documentation? 🧪

After asking the government (or private foundations) to pay for the costs of doing research, we conduct the research and write papers about it that our peers review for free, then we donate those papers to for-profit companies that sell them back to us at high prices. This is considered normal.

Kudos to #Japan for adopting a national #OpenAccess policy, for requiring OA through #repositories rather than #journals — #GreenOA rather than #GoldOA — and for funding to upgrade and standardize the country's institutional repositories. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

“A bizarre failure in the review process at PNAS” statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2024/05/16/a...

Springer Nature decides to "change the direction" of sociology journal Theory and Society and asks the editorial board to resign...which they do and set up their own new open access journal: Theory and Social Inquiry. #Sociology

"The editor-in-chief of the Journal of Trial & Error, Sarahanne Field wants to publish the messy, null and negative results sitting in researchers’ file drawers." #MetaSci #Methodology 🧪

Researchers want a ‘nutrition label’ for academic-paper facts: An ‘at a glance’ approach to publication details, such as journal acceptance rates and the number of peer reviewers, would promote transparency, scientists say. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Announcing *Lifecycle Journals* a new model for scholarly publishing that meets the existing needs of the reward system, integrates many innovations in scholarly communication, and provides a values-aligned, community-led solution. Read more and sign-up for updates: www.cos.io/lifecyclejou...

🚨 PEER REVIEW SURVEY ALERT 🚨 We investigate perceptions & practices of peer review in social sciences worldwide The survey is now ** open to all participants ** 🌎🌍🌏 Thoughts about peer review? Take the survey ➡️peerreviewstudy.com Plz retweet for N and diversity 🔥

Collabra: Psychology is looking for new associate editors for the Social Psychology section. If you're interested, please apply! rug.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_...

So excited to announce our "Easing into Open Science" guide for journal editors is now published in Research Integrity in Peer Review 🎉 Thanks to all my coauthors who made it really fun to lead my first big collaborative project 🧡 Paper: doi.org/10.1186/s410... Full guide: doi.org/10.31219/osf...

This is TOMORROW! LET'S GO! 🧪

So, a fledgling peer review project, peer-review.io, is shutting down. Post mortem from the author here: #AcademicSky #ScientificPublishing #PeerReview Which is sad, though I don't know that I share Bingham's despair re: potential fate of similar initiatives.

21 out of 28 leading political science journals mandate data publication. A small but growing number has data editors www.econstor.eu/handle/10419...

Great thread about preprints! I'll also add that just because journals request that your submission has double spacing and figures at the end, doesn't mean your preprint needs to be ugly. Spend a few minutes to make your preprint compact and readable with smaller line spacing and inline figures.

"Registered report adoption in academic journals: assessing rates in different research domains" ($ but most of the insight from the paper is visible in the figure) link.springer.com/article/10.1...

New preprint! How often do editors/reviewers actually compare preregistrations to the reporting in the article? Almost never. This figure sums up all of the results. Not good.

Another example of why "upon request" data availability statements are a bad practice. #openscience

Happening this week! There's still time to register 😀

PEER REVIEW STUDY ALERT We are about to launch a (very) large-scale survey on peer review in social sciences 150,000+ scholars worldwide will receive an invitation to participate via email. You might be one of them! Wanna know more? peerreviewstudy.com Please share!

Two panels happening next week hosted by @dpjedi.org, free and open to anyone! One on correcting the scientific record, and one on transparent peer review. More info & register here: https://dpjedi.org/events/jedi-2023-annual-meeting.html

Might be relevant for folks interested in #AcademicPublishing 🙂

JEDI is pleased to announce its 2023 Annual Meeting, taking place on November 15 & 16, during which we will be holding two online panels. Both events are open to non-JEDI members. Find more information and register at dpjedi.org/events/jedi-... !

JEDI is pleased to announce its 2023 Annual Meeting, taking place on November 15 & 16, during which we will be holding two online panels. Both events are open to non-JEDI members. Find more information and register at dpjedi.org/events/jedi-... !

Annoying when journals have a correction notice at the top of an article and I click them thinking ‘Oh let me see what was wrong with the paper’ and it turns out to just be something like ‘The authors were listed in the wrong order’

1. Serving as an action editor has changed how I write reviews for other journals. A thread on reviewing: #AcademicSky #PhdSky #PsychSciSky

Here’s my vision statement from my application for Editor in Chief of Psychological Science. I wrote it before getting the position, my plans & goals are evolving now that I’m getting started. Look out for an opening editorial! https://sometimesimwrong.typepad.com/wrong/2023/10/my-next-chapter.html

Missed this from @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social last week. I don't think many would disagree peer review is not equitable. But if we replace humans with AI (if possible, right now it definitely is not), then we should not call it *peer* review any more... scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/09/29/e...