Alexander Wuttke
@kunkakom.bsky.social
📤 4092
📥 2288
📝 532
Digitalization & Pol Behavior LMU_Muenchen | Democracy and Populist Attitudes | Open Science | 🚵♂️🐶
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Verbrecher Verlag
4 days ago
Was ist Faschismus? Haben wir ihn schon? Im Feuilleton tobt gerade eine ziemlich heftig geführte Debatte über den Begriff. Wir empfehlen dazu als vertiefende Lektüre den Band "Was war Faschismustheorie?" hg. v.
@mortenpaul.bsky.social
. Leseprobe:
www.verbrecherverlag.de/shop/was-war...
2
36
16
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
LMU Open Science Center
3 days ago
📢 We are pleased to announce that you can register NOW for our 5th Open Science Summer School!
#OSSS26
🔗 Check out the official website:
bit.ly/4wULxJi
📍 Munich & Zoom 🔥 Various keynotes and engaging, practical workshops ➡️ Apply before July 06 or register anytime for the public lectures!
1
6
1
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Tobias Dienlin
3 days ago
There are some (non ICA) Comm journals offering Registered Reports: - European Journal of Health Comm (
@ejhc.bsky.social
) - Communication Research Reports - Computational Communication Research (
@computationalcommunication.org
) - Frontiers in Communication See:
docs.google.com/spreadsheets...
add a skeleton here at some point
0
5
4
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Brian Nosek
3 days ago
This is a welcome and important step to normalize and popularize the use of Registered Reports. Thanks
@magdalenaskipper.bsky.social
for your leadership, and for the work of the neuroscience and behavioral research editors to test and validate the model at Nature.
add a skeleton here at some point
0
32
7
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Nature
3 days ago
Registered Reports improve the credibility of scientific claims by rewarding big questions, sound methods and solid analyses. They need to become a standard tool in research.
go.nature.com/4dP1rwk
loading . . .
Nature is expanding Registered Reports to all the fields in which we publish
Registered Reports improve the credibility of scientific claims by rewarding big questions, sound methods and solid analyses. They need to become a standard tool in research.
https://go.nature.com/4dP1rwk
1
50
24
wow
add a skeleton here at some point
3 days ago
0
3
1
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
John Holbein
4 days ago
Progress. Kudos to the APSR.
1
16
3
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Ian Hussey
4 days ago
x.com/KelseyTuoc/s...
5
76
23
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Matti Vuorre
5 days ago
The quarto-preprint
@quarto.org
format now includes "boxes" (boring grayscale callouts likely more appropriate for academic papers vs. default quarto callouts):
github.com/mvuorre/quar...
add a skeleton here at some point
0
18
2
This is foundational paper for everyone working to scale up conversational / qualitative interviewing using LLMs. Gives us a benchmark to distinguish better / worse interviews. Also, careful and thoughtful design and execution.
add a skeleton here at some point
10 days ago
2
4
2
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Jay Van Bavel, PhD
10 days ago
The impact of AI is already producing a massive flood of content in so many creative industries--I don't know how we are going review or evaluate all this stuff. The peer review system was already at a breaking point.
www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2...
4
24
10
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Dave
10 days ago
Why is this guy not a complete pariah?
add a skeleton here at some point
1
7
2
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Jamie Cummins
10 days ago
Austin et al. (2026) advocated for AI in hypothesis-driven scale validation research. In this preprint, led by
@wchiggins.bsky.social
, we (
@malte.the100.ci
@bethclarke.bsky.social
) sketch out several weaknesses in this paper, and offer recommendations for avoiding them.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
1/🧵
loading . . .
OSF
https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/yr6d3_v1
1
20
10
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Daniel Lakens
10 days ago
The choice is not between p-values or effect sizes. They go hand in hand. The p-value is there to keep you from seeing effects where there are none. If that bar is passed, you can treat effects as non-zero, and start to reason about what they mean in practice or for a theory.
0
32
6
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Alexia Katsanidou
11 days ago
For my Horizon Project EDGE I am looking for a senior researcher from October 1st. This is a 3-year position on inequalities and democracy support. All information on the job and application process is here:
gesis.jobs.personio.de/job/2639403?...
loading . . .
Post Doctoral Researcher (SDC-28) | Jobs at GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften
GESIS is one of the world's leading social science infrastructure facilities, supporting researchers at all levels of their research projects with expertise and infrastructure services. We help ensure...
https://gesis.jobs.personio.de/job/2639403?language=en
2
25
34
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Marc Debus
11 days ago
In a new (oa) contribution to Party Politics,
@cklamm.bsky.social
, Simone Ponzetto, Ines Rehbein,
@sarahwagner.bsky.social
and I study which additional topics parties addressed in their press releases when publishing their position on the COVID-19 pandemic:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
1/2
1
21
8
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Kim Posster
12 days ago
Eine der großen Storys unserer Zeit sind von einzelnen Oligarchen als verlustgeschäft finanzierte Privat-Medien die extrem einflussreich sind, weil sie erfolgreich das simulieren was vielen Politiker*innen wirklich wichtig ist (am rechten Eliten-Stammtisch der Volkszorn larpt gut ankommen)
add a skeleton here at some point
1
16
3
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Robert Andreasch
13 days ago
In München drangen 10-15 Vermummte in eine Unterkunft von bulgarischen Arbeiter_innen ein und griffen die Bewohner_innen mit Messern und Eisenstangen an, vier wurden verletzt. Die Polizei verschwieg die antiziganistische Parole, die einer der Täter rief:
www.abendzeitung-muenchen.de/muenchen/mit...
6
370
238
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Patrick Dunleavy
13 days ago
Out now & free to download by chapters or whole text, my @LSEPress book with Tim Monteath, Denisa Kostovicova and Hannah Boroudjou *Doing Open Social Science*
press.lse.ac.uk/books/e/10.3...
helps qualitative & quantitative researchers make their work more reproducible & robust
2
15
11
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Gabriela Greilinger
14 days ago
👇🏻💡 "People do not give up democracy in a calculating way to gain politically. Instead, they find ways to convince themselves that they are getting their desired policy and democracy. They still act as undemocratically as concluded in the literature; they just do not perceive it that way."
1
54
23
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Dan Goldstein
14 days ago
No one talks about how the global epidemiologist population went from 3 billion to 30,000 in the period from 2020 to 2026
1
13
2
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Patrick Dunleavy
17 days ago
Published today & free to download by chapters or whole text, my @LSEPress book with Tim Monteath, Denisa Kostovicova and Hannah Boroudjou *Doing Open Social Science*
press.lse.ac.uk/books/e/10.3...
helps qualitative & quantitative researchers make their work more reproducible & robust
1
12
10
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Verbrecher Verlag
15 days ago
Ha! Im „Krumme Straße“-Podcast des Merkur spricht
@mortenpaul.bsky.social
mit Ekkehard Knörer über Faschismus und sein bald erscheinendes Buch "Was war Faschismustheorie?" Mehr:
www.merkur-zeitschrift.de/krumme-stras...
Zum Buch:
www.verbrecherverlag.de/shop/was-war...
loading . . .
Krumme Straße
Krumme Straße ist der gemeinsame Podcast der Zeitschrift Merkur und des KWI Essen. Einmal im Monat sprechen die Gastgeber mit Gästen aus Wissenschaft, Literatur und Kultur über aktuelle Themen, Texte ...
https://www.merkur-zeitschrift.de/krumme-strasse/
2
21
9
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Tommaso Pavone
16 days ago
𝗖𝗮𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘀𝗹𝗶𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘁 “𝗶𝗻𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲” 𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗹𝗶𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘃𝗶𝗴𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀? A few months back
@movadek.bsky.social
& I promised we would try to find out. 𝗪𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝗼𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗦𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗮:
tinyurl.com/2add6c2a
(1/7)
1
22
11
Leading polisci journal clarifies that it is allowed to deviate from pre-analysis plans but deviations must be transparently disclosed. Good. P.S. This LLM-based service for tracking deviations from PAP is awesome:
regcheck.app
add a skeleton here at some point
17 days ago
1
21
5
Early in my PhD, a colleague finishing his (highly rated) dissertation told me he was stuck on the introduction. After years of hard work, he could no longer find an argument for why any of it actually mattered. This stuck with me ever since. A🧵 about this paper:
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
loading . . .
Should social science be more solution-oriented? - Nature Human Behaviour
Duncan Watts considers whether many branches of social science could benefit from setting research goals aimed at specific and manageable real-world problems. He gives examples and discusses how more ...
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0015
18 days ago
3
50
15
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Eiko Fried
19 days ago
Beautiful piece by Awais. Money quote below. My one concern is that many psychiatrists do not in fact mean what Awais means when they say "you have ADHD". They mean it in exactly the same way one says "you have liver cancer". And it's very harmful for mental health science and practice.
add a skeleton here at some point
9
146
44
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Per Engzell
19 days ago
“Breakaway” journals launched by resigning editorial boards often outperform their “zombie” predecessors that retain the brand but lose the community.
doi.org/10.1016/j.re...
2
25
10
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Joseph Sommer
19 days ago
Thrilled this is out!
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
🧵 Do we have 2 kinds of beliefs? Some beliefs seem insensitive to evidence and rarely guide behavior, etc. To explain this, several theories divide belief into 2 types. I argue the explanation isn't in the *mind* but in the *world*
loading . . .
In the Mind or in the World? Types of Beliefs and the Locality of Evidence
People’s beliefs appear to be divisible into two distinct types. Some beliefs refer directly to the observable world, readily guide behavior, and are easily revised when challenged. Others, includi...
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2026.2650209
2
58
34
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Ryan Briggs
20 days ago
We have a new version of this paper out. The headline results are the same—political science must filter results heavily for statistical significance—but we've added many extensions and rewritten much of it in response to feedback (thank you!). A quick thread on updates 👇
add a skeleton here at some point
2
67
20
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Anand Menon
20 days ago
This sounds like a message for those who have stuck with Labour rather than for those who deserted them
8
46
13
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Wissensnetzwerk Rechtsextremismusforschung
23 days ago
#NeuesausderForschung
Diese Woche u.a. mit Forschung zu unfreier Arbeit, Migration, Autoritarismus und einem Anti-Authoritarian Toolkit:
1
8
5
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Randy Ellis
23 days ago
Part 2. Registered reports remove the incentive for positive data (the original sin of science). Publication is conditional on following peer-reviewed methodology, not having "novel" results or p<0.05. This is Part 2, check out Part 1 if you missed it.
#science
#research
#stem
#ethics
#podcast
loading . . .
1
16
7
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
David Karpa
24 days ago
Are you interested in conjoint experiments? Wrote about my new R package *cjdiag* on my website. Feedback welcome!
dkarpa.github.io/blog/2026/be...
0
13
5
Noone has ever donated a single dollar to osf or done anything to make it work well (including myself) but everyone finds they have a right to OSF working perfectly for their needs at all times. Who do we expect is making OSF work perfectly for our needs and with what money if not ours?
add a skeleton here at some point
24 days ago
0
4
0
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Daniel Lakens
26 days ago
Many Labs 5 was such a cool project. Authors who argued that a study from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology was 'too different', leading to a null result, could propose their own replication. Mostly null results again. Blaming auxiliaries is easy. Replication is hard.
1
48
15
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Vincent Arel-Bundock
26 days ago
Do you know a good framework to document data analysis choices? Ex: dropping obs, recoding a var, tuning pars, model + test statistics, etc. Ideally human-readable so people don't have to read my entire codebase. Low-maintenance+ machine-readable for bonus points!
#RStats
#PyData
8
34
12
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR
26 days ago
Offers a lively introduction to new ideas about concepts and concept analysis in political science and international studies Working with Concepts: Foundational Essays by David Collier, with Research Notes on Innovation in the Field, Out Now &
#OpenAccess
#PoliSci
#PoliSky
https://cup.org/4vTeK6X
loading . . .
Working with Concepts
Cambridge Core - Qualitative Research Methods - Working with Concepts
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/working-with-concepts/9B3E0F1EA525D9416341AD83D551AD9C#fndtn-information?utm_date=20260504&utm_id=1777910642&utm_campaign=Books%2CNew+Title%2CPOLI%2CSocial+Sciences&utm_source=bluesky&utm_medium=social&utm_content=
0
11
6
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Jakob Eicheler
27 days ago
So wichtig. Und das habe ich mich schon länger gefragt: Warum ersetzt die Wissenschaft die Verlage bisher nicht großflächig durch solche öffentliche Infrastruktur?
add a skeleton here at some point
1
28
7
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
LMU Open Science Center
27 days ago
🚀 The LMU Open Science Center’s (OSC) new website is live! We now have a refreshed online home, with all of our training programs, resources, initiatives, members, and partners’ profiles in one place. 🔗 Explore it here:
bit.ly/4tb4RyM
What you’ll find on the website: ⬇️
loading . . .
LMU Open Science Center
http://bit.ly/4tb4RyM
1
12
9
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
John Gramlich
29 days ago
Trump's approval rating has declined among those who voted for him: 95% in January 2025 83% in January 2026 78% in April 2026
www.pewresearch.org/politics/202...
1
18
9
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Paul Smaldino
about 1 month ago
This was really well done and worth a watch.
add a skeleton here at some point
0
10
4
Interessante Beobachtung von Stefan Matern dazu, wie Linkspopulismus die Demokratie stabilisieren kann.
add a skeleton here at some point
about 1 month ago
0
6
1
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Peder M Isager
about 1 month ago
My article "Three-Sided Testing to Establish Practical Significance" with
@jackfitzgerald.bsky.social
is now published in AMPPS!
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Three-sided testing is an improved version of TOST that lets you test for equivalence, superiority and inferiority simultaneously.
loading . . .
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/25152459251412435
1
25
15
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Richard J Hewitt
about 1 month ago
Great initiative, sounds a little like
@peercomjournal.bsky.social
another excellent project which I highly recommend & encourage everyone to support!
add a skeleton here at some point
0
9
5
Cumulative science at its best.
add a skeleton here at some point
about 1 month ago
1
4
1
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
LMU Open Science Center
about 1 month ago
📢 Exciting news! We will be presenting a poster (
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
) at
#FOR2026Munich
- The Future of Open Research: Reliable, Responsible, Equitable. Happening from May 4 to 6, 2026, at the Institute for Advanced Studies, Technical University of Munich
opensciencestudies.eu/for-2026-con...
1
6
3
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Jamie Cummins
about 1 month ago
All the more reason to use systematic software designed to tackle this very problem, like RegCheck (
regcheck.app
)
add a skeleton here at some point
0
23
9
reposted by
Alexander Wuttke
Brendan Nyhan
about 1 month ago
Journal editors - the status quo on preregistration is not working! You need to check submissions vs. preregistrations before sending articles out for review. *56%* of experiments I reviewed in last year have severe problems with non-disclosure, undocumented deviations, & more - see Claude summary ↓
6
58
19
Load more
feeds!
log in