Antiwordle #1468 14 guesses ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟥⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟥⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟥🟨🟨⬛ ⬛🟥🟨🟨⬛ 🟨🟥🟨⬛⬛ ⬛🟥🟨🟨⬛ 🟨🟥🟨🟨⬛ ⬛🟥🟥🟥🟥 ⬛🟥🟥🟥🟥 ⬛🟥🟥🟥🟥 ⬛🟥🟥🟥🟥 ⬛🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 And only 4 letters unused.

Quick reflection on what seems to have happened in Court this morning and where it could lead, but perhaps the US Supreme Court would like to consider a fact finding mission here, to see what it means to uphold the "rule of law" against an over-reaching government.

Honestly, the wording of some of these corporate Epstein-related resignations. Next up, Vlad The Impaler: I am stepping down because the media focus on my alleged impaling is becoming a distraction from some of the excellent disciplinary measures being rolled out here.

Our young people face a far more challenging future than I did, and it was great to get the chance to meet these York students and explain our proposals.

A sensible corrective to those who seem to think Pierce was "sacked". Nevertheless multiple failings that led to the lack of a suitable replacement having been lined up.

Up in York for a debate this evening at the University on whether we should introduce a wealth tax. Took time out to walk the city walls. @patmillsuk.bsky.social

can't bear to read this to the end. Daily Mail doorstepping bereaved families. Disgraceful

Wordle 1,698 3/6 ⬛⬛🟨🟩⬛ ⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 @davidpbmaddox.bsky.social @rsteinholz.bsky.social

Any resemblance between our interactive BDC asset breakdown charts and some killer virus is purely accidental

Last year, the UK Govt refused our request to release info about Mandelson's links with US tech giant Palantir. Join our call for full transparency: www.foxglove.org.uk/campaigns/ma...

Wordle 1,697 2/6 🟩⬛🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 @davidpbmaddox.bsky.social @rsteinholz.bsky.social

Congratulations to Duncan Lewis for this outcome in a case we were pleased to fund.

And another excellent panelist for our event next month.

HUGE WIN💥 Korean President Lee has become the first head of state to call out the “millionaire exodus” myth, citing our research with @patmillsuk.bsky.social & @taxjusticeuk.bsky.social debunking it. Korea's tax authority published data contradicting the myth. taxjustice.net/press/korean...

He’s right of course that the tax will be on wealth, represented by assets here that will be taxed on whoever’s hands they are in.

Antiwordle #1463 15 guesses ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟨⬛🟨🟥 ⬛🟨⬛🟨🟥 ⬛🟨⬛🟨🟥 🟨🟨⬛🟨🟥 🟨🟨⬛🟨🟥 🟨🟨⬛🟨🟥 🟨🟨⬛🟨🟥 ⬛🟨🟨🟨🟥 ⬛🟨🟨🟨🟥 🟥🟨🟨🟨🟥 🟥🟨🟨🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥

Wordle 1,695 6/6 ⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛ 🟨⬛⬛⬛🟨 ⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩 ⬛🟨⬛🟩🟩 🟩⬛🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 @davidpbmaddox.bsky.social @rsteinholz.bsky.social

Part of Epstein’s success was understanding the psychology of the wealthy. Of course they could pay for those “massages” etc but their ego demands perks and freebies as a mark of their status. And so, he caught them.

So much has come out about the “young women“ on Epstein Island. But I expect he was an equal opportunities procurer. Wonder whether we will soon begin hearing about “young men”.

Marvellous to see Matchbox Girl by @alicejolly.bsky.social included on the long list for this prize www.walterscottprize.co.uk/announcing-t...

Farage says, "this is far bigger than the Profumo Scandal..." Well he would, wouldn't he?

Oli is right. I paid nothing for my education while many who started Uni recently will never pay off their debt or the ridiculous interest rates levied on it. When and why did we replace “education, education, education” with “debt, debt, debt”?

We have an Elections Bill coming up. Just saying.

Wordle 1,693 2/6 ⬛⬛🟨🟨🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 @davidpbmaddox.bsky.social @rsteinholz.bsky.social

It is refreshing (if also depressing) to see a journalist honest enough to recognise what the Mandelson appointment and defenestration tells us about our media and our politics.

Of course I have now spent 2 days not producing any software at all as I figured out how to sandbox the Claude code genie away from my actual computer. 🤣

This debate on releasing documents into the public domain and what will be redacted, risks generating our own “Epstein Files” saga.

A message from our Chair, Stephen Kinsella (@stephenstroud.bsky.social) regarding the recent polling conducted by Opinium in regards to press standards.

Muscular Christianity.

And here we are.

Google currently overwhelmed with searches on variants of “how does one remove or renounce a peerage”.

This is their best video to date, no question

A peerage isn’t just for Christmas, you know.

We really shouldn’t have to be spending our time and money to get Ofcom to be transparent about its dealings with platforms.

This is half my casework. Stuff that should just happen isn't unless it gets chased and chased. It's exhausting. I've said repeatedly that one of our key missions has got to be just making things work first time!

Man does not live by salary alone But by every crumb that falls from the table of Epstein Discuss.

And another excellent panelist added to our lineup.

This is as good an explanation as I’ve heard.

Spare a thought for the person charged with editing Mandelson’s Wikipedia page.

Why do people who step down to “avoid further embarrassment” for their family, company or Party always hang on until maximum embarrassment has already occurred?

Antiwordle #1457 13 guesses ⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛ ⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛ 🟨🟨⬛⬛⬛ 🟨🟨🟨⬛⬛ 🟨🟨🟨🟨⬛ 🟨🟨🟨🟨⬛ ⬛🟨🟨🟨🟨 ⬛🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟥🟨⬛🟨🟨 🟥🟨⬛🟨🟨 🟥🟨⬛🟨🟨 🟥🟥🟥⬛🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥

Good man. @andyburnham.bsky.social

Marvellous.

I read concerns that the UN will fold. Would that be a disaster? We need a reformed international body, not based in the US and without the entrenched veto powers.

BBC interviewer a few minutes ago on R4 says (clearly scripted) that multiple mentions of Trump in new file drop “doesn’t suggest any wrongdoing”. Do they need a better lawyer to clear this language? It may not “prove” anything yet, but it definitely “suggests” many lines of inquiry.

I am going to save time/space and resume referring to the offender as “Prince Andrew”. Not out of respect, but to remind everyone just how long the Royal Family protected and enabled him. Also our security services must have copious files on him. Epstein won’t have been his only procurer.

You say “draw down” I say “retreat” Let’s call the whole thing off

This captures very persuasively some concerns we have been discussing about “reactionary feminism”, though I’m still unsure how deeply that movement is sincere as opposed to a lucrative new career path for certain commentators.