My latest @techpolicypress.bsky.social: This may be the biggest package of federal children's online safety legislation yet, and it's got further than many other attempts to pass similar laws. Check out my update if you want to know what's in it!

As the 2026 midterms approach, how are the biggest AI firms preparing? Tim Bernard breaks down the election-safety plans from OpenAI, Google and Anthropic—from voting-info partnerships to watermarking to cyber defense—and where the gaps still are. www.techpolicy.press/how-openai-g...

This, by @smgrimes.bsky.social, is brilliant & so needed: a refutal of Jonathan Haidt's & Jean Twenge's moral panic by academics with evidence. It is brief, clear, accessible, and devastating. I, too, quoted those scholars in The Web We Weave. kidsplaytech.com/wp-content/u...

Nice work, Meta, at removing a FB page I reported... 360 days after I reported it?!

In a new paper in the journal Violence Against Women, researcher Kaylee Williams examines a set of “nudify” apps through the lens of tech-facilitated gender-based violence, evaluating their affordances, marketing material, and policies. Tim Bernard unpacks the findings:

🧵 on the new TikTok deal memo and what it means for content policy on the platform:

As the EU moves toward its first DSA fine against X, major platforms have published their 2025 systemic risk reports. Tim Bernard explores what’s changed since 2024, and what the shifting US–EU political climate reveals about how platforms now frame hate speech, information integrity, and DEI.

As the EU moves toward its first DSA fine against X, major platforms have published their 2025 systemic risk reports. Tim Bernard explores what’s changed since 2024, and what the shifting US–EU political climate reveals about how platforms now frame hate speech, information integrity, and DEI.

One tidbit here was that Meta claimed (complained?): "we cannot use our classifiers to proactively detect in Facebook groups, due to legal restrictions." Any ideas which law/s Meta is referring to here? @jtlg.bsky.social @daphnek.bsky.social @mathver.bsky.social

New from me @techpolicypress.bsky.social: How far did tech firms' 2025 realignment with the Republican party reach into their systemic risk reports to the European Commission (which hardly anyone even reads)? A fair bit, it turns out. www.techpolicy.press/platforms-re...

When the deal to sell it closes, TikTok’s share distribution may be consequential for the platform's future content policies. Tim Bernard draws insights from Paddy Leerssen's recent paper, "From Murdoch to Musk: Platform ownership and the political economy of online content governance."

Now an analysis piece @techpolicypress.bsky.social, summarizing the insights from @pjleerssen.bsky.social's paper and applying them to what we currently know about the TikTok deal: www.techpolicy.press/who-will-own...

While we're still waiting on details of the TikTok deal, this paper by @pjleerssen.bsky.social opens up some crucial questions about platform ownership that are still tbd for any new US TikTok entity. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Platforms are accelerating the transition to AI for content moderation, laying off trust and safety workers and outsourced moderators in favor of automated systems, writes Tim Bernard. buff.ly/EvVEFfO

My latest with @techpolicypress.bsky.social piece on a key theme from the @techimpactpolicy.bsky.social's Trust and Research Conference. Includes @dwillner.bsky.social's keynote and presentations from @gligoric.bsky.social, @thejusticecollab.bsky.social's Matthew Katsaros and more.

New from me: the downsides of data centers are already being reckoned with by lawmakers across the US, even as competition for the biggest tax breaks continues apace.

Just updated my @techpolicypress.bsky.social article on spyware to add the effective legal moves against FinFisher that were initiated by a complaint by NGOs including @netzpolitik.org, @rsf.org & @ecchr.bsky.social.

I thought the TikTok ban was an idiotic moral panic and a gross curtailment of expressive freedom, but I’m at least as uncomfortable about a scenario where a platform with 170m US users exists entirely on the personal sufferance of Donald Trump (or any president).

My latest @techpolicypress.bsky.social article:

There were a couple of new pieces of information out last week about the TikTok ban (remember that?), so we've updated my @techpolicypress.bsky.social timeline. techpolicy.press/a-tiktok-ban...

Really, Alan Turing Institute?

If ever a byline bio needed an asterisk... www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...

In a dizzying year, the TikTok ban-or-sale law was passed, challenged, upheld, and halted. Now, as the platform's fate hinges on President Trump's dealmaking, Tim Bernard (@timbernard.me) reviews the twists and turns. A development could come this week, given an April 5 deadline for a deal:

Most researchers don’t believe AGI is coming any time soon. But policy makers are steering policy toward AGI anyway. In this article for Tech Policy Press, a look at the distortions the AGI Frame introduces to policymaking. #ai #criticalai #aipolicy In @techpolicypress.bsky.social

My thoughts on Congress's theory about TikTok and misinformation: I don't think that's how any of this works.

When it comes to the TikTok case, a number of key questions emerge from a review of the petitioners’ and government’s briefs to the Supreme Court, outlined here by @timbernard.bsky.social. How the Justices engage with these questions may give a good indication as to how they will rule.

For Tech Policy Press, Tim Bernard (@timbernard.bsky.social) read a selection of the Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) systemic risk assessments released in late November 2024 in compliance with the Digital Services Act (DSA), including those for Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and X reports.

For those interested in #DSA VLOP systemic risk reports, here is a good summary for some of the big ones. @timbernard.bsky.social www.techpolicy.press/reading-the-...

Tim Bernard (@timbernard.bsky.social) is reading a selection of the Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) systemic risk assessments released in late November 2024. Today's update includes TikTok.

Tim Bernard (@timbernard.bsky.social) is reading a selection of the Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) systemic risk assessments released in late November 2024. Today's update includes YouTube. www.techpolicy.press/reading-the-...

"By translating the risks into problem areas that already coincide with its policies, Meta may be missing some aspects and, in effect, putting its thumb on the scale to lead to a conclusion that it is already successfully performing mitigation efforts." - @timbernard.bsky.social

Tim Bernard is reading a selection of the Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) systemic risk assessments released in late November 2024 in compliance with the Digital Services Act (DSA). This first installment considers Facebook and Instagram reports:

Sorry for the long explainer, but the fact that we have demonized ads & behavioral advertising is one of the dumbest things to come out of the techlash. It fails to acknowledge advertisings crucial role in media pluralism for ALL OF HISTORY; our overcorrection for it is part of why we're here 5/5

This feed has posts from your followers without any of their retweets.

whynotboth.gif

We're assembling a starter pack of Tech Policy Press contributors on Bluesky! Follow the folks in our community for perspectives on a range of issues at the intersection of technology and democracy!

If you want to keep track of online safety policy in the UK (and key developments beyond the UK), this newsletter is incredibly useful - and it doesn't hesitate to include commentary that deviates from the org's own perspective.

@techpolicypress.bsky.social, @noupside.bsky.social & I put out an analysis of four major platforms' moderation policies for election day and beyond. Thanks @justinhendrix.bsky.social @timbernard.bsky.social Diane Chang & Gabby Miller!

Pleased to have contributed to this timely research.

DSA speculation: Even big NGOs may prefer to just submit cases to ODS bodies instead of becoming trusted flaggers: similar benefit of forcing platforms to respond but *far* less burdensome (though may be slower) @daphnek.bsky.social @hutko.bsky.social @danielholznagel.bsky.social

For the past nearly four years, researchers from various disciplines have explored the relationship between social media and the January 6, 2021 insurrection in Washington DC. What does their work tell us? Dean Jackson, @justinhendrix.bsky.social, and @timbernard.bsky.social reviewed the findings:

Article 21 of the DSA sets out a mechanism by which tech platform users can resolve disputes over content moderation and other policy decisions through certified “Out-of-Court Dispute Settlement“ (ODS) bodies. The Oversight Board just launched one. @timbernard.bsky.social considers it.

Starter pack: go.bsky.app/UxQCnfV. Should have all 122 in there, but a couple of the handles are misbehaving in search so a chance something is amiss.

A law about political ads with over 80% support amongst both Democrats and Republicans? More on this in my writeup of the new @techpolicypress.bsky.social poll

A trend worth following...

New York's SAFE for Kids Act targets social media addiction. What does the law do, and will it withstand scrutiny in court? @timbernard.bsky.social looks at the details:

My review of Ofcom's most recent consultation package highlights some flaws at the heart of the Online Safety Act, in particular, how the Safety by Design framework, while surely valuable, is ill-suited for imposing through regulation.

I'm reading the new Ofcom guidance, and have a hypothesis that algorithmically demoting content makes complete sense from an internal platform perspective, but is basically incoherent from a regulatory mandate perspective.

@timbernard.bsky.social writes that a report and panel discussion produced by New America's Open Technology Institute advances the debate over age verification and whether it can keep kids safer online.