The show is taking a little break for the holidays. No new episode this month, but keep an eye out for a fresh one in early January!

New episode! @minzlicht.bsky.social is back and fired up about citation diversity staments. We discuss the much-criticised Nature Reviews Psychology editorial encouraging authors to include them in their articles, as well as Mickey's very problematic beer tastes. share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

Does anyone know how much it costs to publish in Nature Reviews Psychology? Their APC doesn't seem to be listed on the web anywhere.

New episode! David Tannenbaum joins the show to talk about one of Yoel's favorite papers: a massive field study of honesty in 40 countries that had some unexpected results. Also, we talk about hiking and David actually drinks two beers. share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

From this paper: (Holy Cow! Reminds me also of how Bullshit Receptivity items can glom together!)

Very cool discussion between @yoelinbar.net and @paulbloomatyale.bsky.social on when to quit theories, usually either too soon or too late Super relevant for criminology, where it’s rare to see any crim theory truly put to rest www.fourbeers.com/122

Listening to the episode now and the section on cognitive dissonance pushed me to share this paper of ours: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.... Reasons to be skeptical of cognitive dissonance theory!

New episode! @paulbloomatyale.bsky.social interviews Yoel about when to give up on a theory, and which of his own findings he no longer believes. But it's not all doom and gloom! We also talk about findings we think are solid, and, of course, Sydney Sweeney. share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

Folks, it's time to submit your papers to PCI Psychology. Here is our invitation to you, taken from our editorial osf.io/preprints/ps...

New episode! Returning guest Spencer Greenberg (spencrgreenberg.bsky.social) joins the show to talk replications, what psychologist think of controversial topics, and an AI tool he developed to predict correlations between psychological traits and survey questions. share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

And some more on moral opposition to AI @yoelinbar.net @hellovic.bsky.social @reemayad.bsky.social @eloisecote.bsky.social @minzlicht.bsky.social www.nuancebehavior.com/article/mora...

FINALLY got to chat with @yoelinbar.net about everything Jews-and-DEI. thecjn.ca/news/campus/...

New episode! UBC's Amori Mikami rejoins the show to talk to Yoel about DEI. Many prominent universities are rethinking DEI policies that once seemed unquestionable. So what is the future of DEI in higher ed, and what should it be? share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

New episode! David Pizarro (@peez.bsky.social) joins the show to talk about the concept of "purity" in moral psychology. Is there really a unified psychology of handwashing, pet-eating, and baby Jesus buttplugs, or is purity just a chimera? share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

Really proud of this new work out @psychscience.bsky.social. Led by the amazing but bluesky-less Amanda Geiser and with @deborahsmall.bsky.social. We show that when comparing moral wrongs, people are (much) more willing to “scale up” than to “scale down” condemnation and punishment…

Measurement error, Nobel Prize winning research, friendly disagreements, and more.... datacolada.org/124

New episode! @minzlicht.bsky.social is back to talk about cannabis research, empathic AI, and some stuff we saw at SPSP. share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

Should we care more about shrimp? www.slowboring.com/p/mailbag-mo...

At @spspnews.bsky.social, many asked for guidelines on using LLMs in the social sciences. Our new paper in AMPPS addresses exactly that! We provide a primer for evaluating LLMs in social science research, focusing on methodological rigor, replicability, and validity: osf.io/preprints/ps...

There will be no new episode in February (mostly because of travel)--but we'll be back in March with a special guest!

In case you woke up today thinking "I really need to hear Yoel Inbar talk about a Baby-Sitters Club book"--I have some good news for you. Thanks to my old friend Esme Schaller and new friend @emilykcrandall.bsky.social for having me on! www.stuckinstoneybrook.com/episodes/daw...

If you are looking for a distraction, tune in to me and @yoelinbar.net chatting about a topic totally unrelated to current events.

Better late than never, it’s out! share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

January's episode will be late due to Yoel packing the wrong mic to Vancouver 🤦‍♂️ The episode (featuring @syeducation.bsky.social) will be out by Monday the 20th. Sorry about the delay, all!

New Substack: My Christmas Day love letter to The Big Lebowski. A celebration of its absurdity, profanity, and the genius of The Dude. Plus, a contest: drop your most obscure Lebowski line and the best two win a 3-month paid subscription. 🎳🕶️ Think hard, Achievers! open.substack.com/pub/michaeli...

Excellent post on the lack of empirical support for stereotype threat, from someone deeply involved in the research. Also, importantly, "stereotype threat isn't real" != "stereotypes are not threatening." These are very different claims, but the former is often taken to mean the latter.

Im bearish on current AI models (ie LLMs). I work w/ them every day, but think use cases are much smaller than hype. I’ve been shocked by how many people (academics!), who clearly don’t understand the tech, making super confident claims about their uselessness and “evil” Your posts are public!

Have to say, the replies to this have been so depressing. @afinetheorem.bsky.social and @joshgans.bsky.social have worked to develop an innovative product. Whether it improves learning is an empirical question, we’ll find out soon. The sad people in the replies should be blocked.

I know this is the nice place, but I'm on lists that anyone can see called things like, "harassers", "piss drinkers", "bigoted freaks", and "hate enablers." This appears to be based on accounts I follow or posts I like? Don't recall liking any piss refreshments. Seems like a toxic feature ☹️

Enjoyed this conversation of @yoelinbar.net and @minzlicht.bsky.social on Bluesky as a political bubble. One glance at #FIFA confirms their stance. Only variations of the same opinion about Saudi Arabia as the World Cup host. podcasts.apple.com/nl/podcast/t...

New lab paper! In a registered report, Jesse Reid and I looked at the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), and implicit/explict attitudes in a large sample of participants from @projectimplicit.bsky.social. online.ucpress.edu/collabra/art...

America is deeply imperfect but it’s also very prosperous. Our political system is clunky but has delivered reforms and is capable of being reformed itself. Most Americans - not all, but most - live extraordinarily comfortable lives by any reasonable historic standard.

Playing around with this awesome data explorer. The poorest decile in the U.S., contrary to my expectations, does better than in most of Europe (this is inclusive of tax and benefits). Another illustration of how rich the U.S. is!

New episode! Mickey returns to talk about the 2024 election, Bluesky, and his crusade against yard signs. We discuss prediction markets, Democratic declines with non-college voters, and whether Bluesky is a left-wing bubble (and if so, if that's a problem). share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

Tragedy of the inbox commons

Help needed with power analysis! We plan a study where the predicted results are as shown. What tools can I use to figure out the necessary N to find this 2 x 2 interaction? One complication is that the d values we are expecting come from between-participant studies, but ours will be entirely within

What do folks here on bluesky think of these studies from Lee Jussim? I'd like to see it peer reviewed, but the basic effects seem very straightforward - read DEI scholars' excerpts and you will see objectively innocuous behavior as racist.

Tiny rant: I know some people are upset about the election, me too. But some of the commentary from progressives (i.e., most of academia) can be summarized as, "those poor uneducated people are too stupid to vote right," and well, that's my family you're talking about..1/2

Please shout this from the rooftops! If the “right answer” is 3% and the average response is 30%, this doesn’t mean people are “wrong” and actually believe it’s 30%. They might just not be paying attention to your survey and/or are guessing randomly.

Literally no one asked, but here it is: the Two Psychologists Four Beers Starter Pack. Includes a fridge full of saisons, a Thinking Fast and Slow book you’ve been meaning to finish, and just the right amount of “enlightened centrism” to annoy everyone. Cheers! go.bsky.app/R9tz99y

Everybody's saying that discussions are nicer here, so let's see how this goes. I have a potentially controversial opinion: I think that to some degree, a progressive bias in publishing is warranted (but perhaps not for the reason that you'd think). Let me explain why. 1/n

New episode! Paul Bloom joins the show to talk about whether much of developmental psychology is not worth doing, where he thinks psychology has succeeded, and whether we should be more skeptical of progressive-friendly social science findings. share.fireside.fm/episode/Ah1O...

I'm worried about echo chambers because my academic life is homogeneous in ideas and I see the negative effects of it. I think this is because of my personal experience growing up in urban poverty. I'm sensitive to elitism. Going home challenges me intellectually in a way these communities don't.

That shadowy place way out there? That is beyond our borders. You must never go there. That is the Big Boy graveyard.

Psych Science's incoming editor Simine Vizire (@simine.com) is shaking things up The new board includes 16 editors focusing just on methods www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...

I'm thrilled to announce the new Psych Science editor team! We'll start on Jan 1, 2024. Check us out: here: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/psychological_science/2024-editorial-board We're spread across 15 countries in 5 continents! 🌍🌎🌏 Here’s a thread to introduce the team!

Here's a new paper from the lab (with first author Paige Amormino and stats expert Brett Mercier) where we investigate how people judge the praiseworthiness of helping. osf.io/preprints/ps... #socialpsych #PsychSciSky

@improvingpsych.bsky.social @cogscisociety.bsky.social #cogpsyc #PsychSciSky #socialpsyc #DecisionMaking #forecasting #BehSci A MAJOR initiative on #Crowdwisdom with substantial top prizes. Please share!