The banality, everyday-ness of hate is one of the most striking parts of this. The way in which bystanders are once again happy to make humiliation of trans and gender non-conforming people a part of their routine social interactions.

The NHS are forcibly detransitioning trans kids in Brighton and calling it “managed withdrawal.” Their own impact assessment acknowledges trans kids will be at increased risk of harm as a result, don’t want this, and are likely to just use DIY hormones instead

It was so nice to see @pagingdrpaige.bsky.social and Gina, and to have a small PhD workshop filled with feminist and queer care practices to navigate academia!

I confirm - once again - that not having to justify your whole existence to access basic gender affirming healthcare FEELS GOOD. And light. And decent. Thank you Australia (2025) and Belgium (2021) for these brief encounters with your imperfect (!!) but not violently transphobic healthcare systems.

I’m taking a breather from England and its transphobia, and reading this from a place where gender self-determination is a solid policy makes the hate and cruelty so visible and incomprehensible at the same time.

All good BUT details matter: > the Court misgenders the applicant EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. 🤯 > no critique of aim of the interference - the aim to maintain states’ ability to exclude some trans people from recognition and protect cisnormativity is still *fine* for the Court.

Hi! I’ll be in Melbourne this summer for a research visit :) If anyone has tips about the city, bookshops to visit, queer things to do, leads on housing, or anything else, let me know!!

Last week I had the amazing opportunity to chat about trans rights catastrophes in the Uk with @pagingdrpaige.bsky.social and Manon!! Chatting and complaining about the case with such amazing minds was such an important part of making sense of what’s happening on terf island.

Time to make *those* worst-case scenario type of plans for trans people in the UK. The hard reality is that this is not a panic-induced call, but a very calm and rational one.

The ruling, as I understand it, did not say that trans women cannot use women's toilets as such. It said it is lawful to exclude us. Which sucks but the difference matters. If organisations discriminate against us it's a decision they are making, not something they've been forced into.

I’m still struggling to express my horror for the UK Supreme Court judgement in full sentences. To be with thousands of fellow trans people and allies made it possible to feel and think about resistance.

The ECtHR has had a major role in the achievement of trans rights in the UK. One of the central elements of Goodwin v. The UK was the recognition of the applicant's affirmed gender in *all aspects of her life* This is one of the few aspects of on trans jurisprudence where the ECtHR has been clear.

🏳️‍⚧️UCU and the trade union movement stands with the trans community. Join us and fellow unions for an emergency demo on Saurday: 📍Parliament Square 🗓 Sat 19 April 🕐 1pm Solidarity means standing together, especially when it’s hardest. ✊

This is very true. There are many things to abhor about the judgment but the protected characteristic of 'gender reassignment' stands.

In the face of this horrific attack on equalities from Labour, important to note what we still have: Stock did not leave Sussex because of a policy. She left because she couldn't stand colleagues' and students' free speech, their opposition to her bigotry. Governments cannot take this power away.

If you are trans, live in England, and think you might want to change your gender marker on the NHS, contact your GP to sort it **asap**. The UK government is cracking down on trans people and we have seen exactly how this plays out in the US. The form for your GP is here:

‘The accusations of ‘child abuse’ and the promotion of mental illness may be stupidly rhetorical exaggeration but they are not likely to be taken literally’ (para 159). Yet, these are things that have been taken increasingly literally over the last 5 years.

Notice the difference: - Addressing 'gender-critical' beliefs as "transphobic" is an unlawful sterotype, potentially amounting to discrimination. - But calling queer/trans people "child-abusers" is more of a "rhetorical exaggeration" or "derogatory sneer". bsky.app/profile/jess...

Also concerning was the obiter endorsement of the EHRC's claim, itself built from obiter, that to consider people with "gender-critical" beliefs ('gender is binary/sex is immutable') to be transphobic is "stereotyping", and can amount to discrimination of a protected belief. Really troubling.

Poland experts release clinical guidance on trans youth healthcare. They define the Cass Review as of "low scientific value and credibility". journals.viamedica.pl/endokrynolog...

In my PhD I claim that the institutional pathologisation of trans people may amount to torture. Last week I started wondering whether by the time I finish it, there will even be a framework to characterise as torture. The attacks on rights are quickly permeating in the uk and rest of Europe

Today, England feels, tastes and smells like persecution. Accessing healthcare as a trans person in this country was already daunting. Not sure where this would leave us and our future.