Devan Jaganath, MD MPH (@djaganath.bsky.social)

#tbsky #idsky We modeled the use of child TB treatment decision algorithms - providing primary care facilities with diagnostics is lower cost than referring all to district facilities, but we need to still improve specificity and reduce treatment costs: journals.theunion.org/content/ijtl...

loading . . .

Integrated treatment-decision algorithms for childhood TB: modelling diagnostic performance and costs SUMMARYBACKGROUNDTo improve childhood TB diagnosis, treatment-decision algorithms (TDAs) with and without chest X-ray (CXR) were developed for children under age 10. We aimed to model diagnostic performance and costs of implementing TDAs in primary health centre (PHC) and district hospital (DH) settings in Uganda.METHODSWe developed decision-tree models following the TDA pathway from evaluation to treatment-decision. We compared six scenarios with combinations of diagnostic testing (stool and respiratory Xpert, urine lipoarabinomannan, and/or CXR) at PHCs and DHs. Outcomes were diagnostic accuracy and cost per correct treatment-decision for a cohort of 10,000 children with presumptive TB using a Monte Carlo simulation from a health system perspective. Costs were reported in 2024 international dollars (I$).RESULTSIn all scenarios, TDAs had high sensitivity (80.8%–91.9%) but low specificity (50.9%–60.9%). Total diagnostic and treatment costs for the cohort were I$1,768,958–2,470,298, largely driven by overtreatment of false-positive cases. Diagnostic costs were mostly offset by reducing overtreatment. The cost per treatment-decision was lowest using mobile CXR at PHCs (I$287) and highest with DH referral (I$449).CONCLUSIONThe TDAs have high sensitivity and can be implemented at PHCs with lower costs than DHs. Improving specificity and reducing treatment costs would enable affordable, large-scale implementation. https://journals.theunion.org/content/ijtldo/3/1/31