For this #FluorescenceFriday, a gorgeous image of an adult mouse kidney labeled with AQP2 and alpha SMA antibodies. AQP2 (green) marks the collecting duct and distal connecting segment while SMA marks the arterial tree. Courtesy of talented postdoc Sarah McLarnon.

This paper does a great job with a "It's a Wonderful Life" scenario about NIH, supposing the consequences of the bottom 40% of the funding NIH grants never existed. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... tl:dr The world would lose a lot, but directly and indirectly

Any academic folks on H1B visas (even with stamps in passports) please get legal advice from your University attorneys before leaving the US.

Arundhati Roy’s intense memoir of her mother “Mother Mary comes to me” is a brutal read, yet funny and poignant. Rekindled my love of reading and brought on all the emotions of complicated mother-daughter relationships, orthodoxy of Kerala Syrian Christians, and not conforming to societal norms.

It bears repeating that nearly the entire US enterprise in science and technology has been irreversibly gutted. This is shocking. All this loss has occurred without any real benefit to the average US citizen. Except we now have the biggest, best funded secret police force perhaps ever. Yay for us!

Wistfully thinking about the days when incompetent Reviewer 3 was the biggest problem…

The GOP needs to understand the economic impact of the cuts from the Trump administration. Higher education drives economies. “If you include the hospital systems, [our impact] is well over $60 billion, and it's 7% of our whole economy — literally more than coal and natural gas combined.”

Science is a long game. Translational science, or clinical medicine is only possibly because of basic science discoveries where the clinical applications are not yet known. Also: Nobels are typically awarded for basic science… *exploratory* basic science. True story.

Over 20 years after Julius’s lab and mine cloned TRPM8, it is rewarding to see this science helping patients. The TRPM8 agonist Tryptyr treats dry eye by increasing tear production. A reminder that NIH-funded curiosity-driven research translates to medicines. tryptyr.myalcon.com?gad_source=1...

From a trip to PNW and being reminded how beautiful this country is. My childhood was spent in a crowded and polluted city (much as I loved it). But the majestic splendor of the natural beauty in the US will never cease to amaze me. Hope we can sustain the national parks.

Senate Appropriations has a modest *INCREASE* in NIH funding but it will need to be recconciled with the house cut. If you have not been calling your representative of late now would be a good time to start again www.appropriations.senate.gov/hearings/ful...

Yup this.. paylines below 5% are demoralizing not only for applicants but also reviewers. Good luck, NIH, finding reviewers to take on this task..

Finding comfort in little things these days. Working with a good group of people, discussing science, sharing ideas. Trying to tune the noise and chaos out in moments like this. Lab lunch.

I don’t know how to say it more strongly: it is asinine to think that AI and basic/exploratory, creative science are at all similar, never mind interchangeable. There are many details one could get into on this, but the important takeaway is the above. 🧪

So, it seems that the conclusions are: (1) The communications around this policy have been atrociously bad; (2) NIH leadership includes some people with strong opinions about animal-based research who aspire to reduce or eliminate the use of animals, but realize that this would be foolish now.

so.... NIH issued a news item clarifying the new use of animals policy. It seems that the bottom line is that NIH will not issue NoFOs specifically about creation or use of animal models of disease. 1/2 grants.nih.gov/news-events/...

i wrote an essay for @thetransmitter.bsky.social about what it feels like to serve on an NIH grant review panel (study section) right now www.thetransmitter.org/craft-and-ca...

Wish I could repost this a million times! In addition to shifting research focus, the increasing dependence on philanthropic and private foundation funds also meant that these billionaires had to be placated and flattered to maintain support, even if they were completely wrong.

Tapping the sign that says “NSF, NIH, and public investment into basic research are the real engines of US innovation”

Silicon Valley VCs sit atop a system where federal and state governments spent more on basic research of all kinds than most other countries in the world combined, and then take the ideas that come out of that and take it the last mile. An important function, but they disproportionately benefit.

One reason some people are fine with destroying NSF and NIH is they think that AI will replace scientists soon. This is wrong, and this big error is setting back cancer and Alzheimer’s research right now.

Very thankful for my non competing renewal coming in in time-something I had taken for granted previously 😅 Also for a PO who responds instantly to all queries-thank you.

Finding joy in little things-fluffy idlis (as close to my mother’s as I could make them), morning coffee, cats snoozing in the quiet hum of the house, and manuscript submitted this week.

It’s official! Fall 2025, I go from “Assistant” to “Associate” Professor. Thanks to trainees (ugrad/grad/postbacs), professional/personal networks, & family for supporting my goal of establishing a vibrant research program that puts people before projects. More science, scientists, & understanding!

Nostalgia for the days of science Twitter where the arguments where about how to justify the font in grants, whether labs should be named after the PI, NIH paylines at around 16%, and academia vs industry as career options for PhDs 😭

Red states and blue states alike Equal opportunity damage to biomedical research and the US economy

This week, I’ve seen colleagues serve on NIH study section, doing their job diligently, submit papers, mentor students, serve on university committees, be excited about the science at conferences. Despite all the uncertainties and chaos. Don’t know what’s ahead but you can’t break spirits so easily.

BREAKING: Judge denies NSF's 15% indirect rate plan. Like the DOE and NIH attempts, it too has now been rejected by courts. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

If someone had said, “Who cares how desert lizard venom works? Let’s not fund that research,” we never would have discovered semaglutide, a key component of drugs such as Wegovy and Ozempic, which have helped millions of Americans lose weight.

Love the new simplified review criteria for NIH applications-allows you to focus on why the research should be done, and can it be done well? without all the fillers. No extensive comments on investigator expertise/environment. But wish we could go back to in-person study sections. Teams sucks!

An NIH staffer reacts to today's ruling: "I'm looking forward to the day that we are so slammed with work trying to reinstate everything that we had to terminate illegally — I'll work 24/7 to make that happen if I can."

Spending a few days with intramural researcher at NIH has me thinking about the old Bell Labs, the storied research institute where major breakthroughs in physics, chemistry and mat sci (and associated @nobelprize.bsky.social awards) were made in the 70s-80s 1/n

Subhojit replaces Giampietro Schiavo as an Editor at JCS. We’d like to take this opportunity to thank Gipi for all his work with us over the last 18 years.

Yesterday, when I signed they were aiming for 6000 signatures. Today there are almost 15,000 and they are aiming for 25,000! If you haven't signed and want to support the scientists at the NIH that are trying to prevent its dismantling, please sign. You can do it anonymously!

Kudos to the brave NIH staff who show up for work every day. Who decided to speak truth to power even as their jobs could be at stake. I signed. We can get the number of signers up to the millions to show that we care about the future of NIH and research in this country.

I wanted to show support for these brave public servants and to allow others, including the scientific community, to join me. In partnership with @standupforscience.bsky.social‬, we have a way for you to do that... www.standupforscience.net/bethesda-dec...

This is on all the Senators who turned a blind eye and voted to confirm. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/h...

Sharing this not because I need support (I’m fine), but because we all need to be aware of how bad things are getting, especially for people who are foreign, “look foreign,” and/or have an accent, even in very progressive, very blue places. 🧵

He resolved that he would not stop either, even though it was a huge sacrifice on his part. I believe this is what we owe our trainees: so long as they are invested in their work, we must be as well, even if it seems like the world is on fire around us, both literally and figuratively. 10/

Almost all Nobel Prizes are awarded for work that is exploratory, or absolutely basic science with no obvious commercial or medical benefit. You cannot predict where advancements come from, so you have to invest in science and scientists. Targeted (corporate) science investment will never do this.

No matter what I’m doing, this little guy likes to hang close. Left all the nooks and corners in the house to curl up on my work desk, occasionally giving me an admonishing look for working on a Sunday 😀

Neurotrophic Factors GRC 2025 complete. Felt good to focus on science with an awesome community for a few days, and shut out the nonsense outside. Newport RI is an amazing venue, makes up for the bunkbeds in dorms housing.

🙏 to editor Sian Lewis for this @natrevneuro.nature.com highlight on our recent paper www.nature.com/articles/s41...

“It makes a really powerful statement that the professors themselves are stakeholders and that it’s just not the institutions alone...It’s a way of saying, ‘Well, if you’re slow to the battlefield, we’re going to get there first.’” www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...

Uber driver this morning-well informed individual, registered Independent, likes some of what Trump is doing, admires Elon Musk, hates dems for mismanagement (based on local politics), dislikes dismantling of research funding for cancer and deportation of immigrants. But “universities are too woke”

It's too bad we don't have an august body—an academy of sorts—of privileged and professionally secure scientists, engineers, and physicians who could speak the truth, stand up for what's right, resist rather than concede, and not offer a helping hand to the people demolishing American science.

The proposed 45% cut to the NIH by the current administration will preclude new awards, and even terminate (more) existing awards. This means a catastrophic decline in the development of new treatments for cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and infectious diseases How is that good for the US?

To put these top-line budget numbers in context, cuts of this magnitude would effectively mean no new grants in FY2026. The entire extramural budget would go to existing, continuing grants. An abject failure of American ambition. And a betrayal of our global leadership in health science innovation.

Remember folks, the budget cuts for NSF and NIH *can still be stopped*. That is a luxury not granted to our agency science colleagues who have or could still lose their jobs from the top down. So - Fight! Speak up! Pay attention!