Craig Green is very worth reading on Erie papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

What I'm saying is that Niskanen should bring on some fellows to do esoteric readings of Plato

The criticisms here of the effects on law students are right, but miss the most important piece: hiring on first semester grades hurts first-gen students, students who don't have lawyers in the family, students who take a little longer to adjust to law school, etc. 1/ www.law.com/2025/08/18/h...

Excellent scholarly analysis by @andrewkent.bsky.social of Trump's invocation of Alien Enemies Act. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

As we watch the increasing weaponization of economic tools, this new collection of (often prescient) articles on "Economic Sanctions and the Law" in the Fordham International Law Journal has become only more relevant: www.fordhamilj.org/volume-48-is...

Even if justices are geniuses, a democratic culture, committed to the people's self-govt largely through elective institutions, should work hard treat them like ordinary people with a job (though an important one). The fan cults around eg Scalia and RBG were embarrassing and unfortunate

This isn’t aimed only at Sotomayor. But to expand on Robert’s point, with the exception of Holmes and Posner, none of these people are geniuses. They’re generally good lawyers who had the benefit of circumstance. Treating them like wizards—as we do at these public talks—is a recipe for disaster.

Big news! After 8 years of exemplary service, @gauthamrao.bsky.social is stepping down as editor of @lawandhistrev.bsky.social. The ASLH seeks applications for the next editor. Great opportunity, though Gautham's shoes will be hard to fill. Details here: legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2025/08/law-...

Delighted to share my latest, History and Fetishism in the New Separation of Powers Formalism, now live in the Penn Law Review! The piece traces the emergence of the Supreme Court’s new approach to separation of powers law and argues that it is grounded in a set of basic mistakes. (1/3)

I've just posted "The Alien Enemies Act of 1798," a draft article doing a deep dive into all aspects of the statute and background law -- what it all meant in 1798. It defines "invasion" and "predatory incursion," among other provisions. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

there's a nice (derogatory) confluence between the second trump administration's embrace of Redemption politics and its effort to engage in a Redemption-style rewriting of Jan 6 and associated recent history

This is so awful. Life saving technology attacked by an addled loon, utterly unfit for his job Kennedy Cancels Nearly $500 Million in mRNA Vaccine Contracts www.nytimes.com/2025/08/05/h...

Finally a car that can make any hard right turn.

At my kids' K-12 school, wokeness definitely coming from teachers and admin staff, not all of them, for sure. But those groups seem stronger generators of it than students, I think

strongly strongly strongly recommend

Very well done Lawfare piece co-authored by one of my Fed Courts students at a Fordham law. Oral Argument Summary: CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. Ltd. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/oral...

Seeking multiple litigation attorneys to join our impact litigation team on a contract basis for 6 months, possibility of extension. And, seeking an experienced, passionate Dir. of Partnerships to manage a midsize fundraising team, deadline for this role is May 12. protectdemocracy.org/jobs

I’ve been struck by the fact that the most influential conservative intellectual judges and commentators when I was in law school are now some of the loudest and clearest voices speaking out against the abuses of this administration.

My thoughts on the Alien Enemies Act, DOJ v. Boasberg, Trump v. Roberts, and where we are. open.substack.com/pub/executiv...

At @jotwell.bsky.social, I explain why @fordhamlawnyc.bsky.social prof @donibloomfield.bsky.social thinks IP scholars should pay more attention to export controls and secrecy orders ip.jotwell.com/government-s...

The Trump Administration: Protecting Tesla dealers more fiercely than they protected the Capitol.

Good piece. But Harry Bridges was not just an "Australian union organizer" in the US targeted for "pro-labor speech activities." Soviet archives evidence shows he was a CPUSA leader -- at a time when that org was significantly involved with Stalin's intel services. Bridges repeatedly lied about this