Wikipedia Nerd
@wikipedianerd0.bsky.social
📤 12
📥 6
📝 71
I edit Wikipedia for fun. Give it a try:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Introduction
reposted by
Wikipedia Nerd
Blake C. Stacey
18 days ago
It's a bad idea, being advanced under the guise of "holding Big Tech accountable". In reality, the super-rich will benefit and every attempt to build a new kind of social media (Bluesky, Mastodon, etc., etc.) will suffer. Put it this way: Wikipedia needs Section 230.
medium.com/wikimedia-po...
loading . . .
If Congress Repeals Section 230, What Will that Mean for Wikipedia?
This is the first installment in our three-part series about Section 230.
https://medium.com/wikimedia-policy/if-congress-repeals-section-230-what-will-that-mean-for-wikipedia-691559dfb2c5
2
77
20
reposted by
Wikipedia Nerd
Renee DiResta
18 days ago
I just interviewed Jimmy Wales about it for Lawfare. He was refreshingly unapologetic about the Wikipedia editorial community's perpetual discussion of sources and the reality that some simply better than others.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtp1...
loading . . .
2
65
14
reposted by
Wikipedia Nerd
Matthew Facciani
20 days ago
One very effective yet overlooked way scientists can combat misinformation is by improving Wikipedia pages and contributing high-quality posts on Reddit.
2
31
9
reposted by
Wikipedia Nerd
Auld Lang Nya (Cay's Version)
21 days ago
There is much debate about the American education system failing entire generations, which is why I propose exploring the method I used to gain vast knowledge: checking wikipedia to ensure the accuracy of a shitpost and falling down a 4 hour rabbit hole reading about the Habsburg Monarchy
0
18
5
reposted by
Wikipedia Nerd
23 days ago
Most are still in the dark ages about Wikipedia not being a reliable source for papers. Even though primary citations are available anyways in all the articles. The funny thing is it's more reliable than the AI slop that will default from kids Google searches now.
1
10
1
reposted by
Wikipedia Nerd
Tim Pierce
26 days ago
It's stunning to think about how many people who used to say "you can't trust anything in Wikipedia, anyone can put stuff in there" will now unhesitatingly believe anything they see from an LLM chatbot ... trained on Wikipedia.
add a skeleton here at some point
0
7
1
reposted by
Wikipedia Nerd
Social Media Lab
28 days ago
There was a time when professors warned students never to cite Wikipedia. Now it has become foundational knowledge for AI systems and a trusted resource for community fact-checkers who use it to make sense of information & settle debates.
notetracker.socialmedialab.ca
#FactChecking
#DigitalLiteracy
4
43
22
reposted by
Wikipedia Nerd
Analyst Hyacinth, in the moss, with a dagger
about 1 month ago
Great rant by
#HankGreen
in defense of
#wikipedia
, which gets my three bucks every month 💜
youtube.com/watch?v=9zi0...
loading . . .
Wikipedia and the Destruction of Trust
YouTube video by Hank Green
https://youtube.com/watch?v=9zi0ogvPfCA
0
2
2
reposted by
Wikipedia Nerd
Christopher-J (fka Beauty Personified)
27 days ago
In 2025, people spent an estimated 2.4 billion hours reading English Wikipedia articles ... The
#Top20
most-read English
#Wikipedia
#articles
of 2025 outlined below focus on politics, popular culture, and loss.
wikimediafoundation.org/news/2025/12...
loading . . .
Announcing Wikipedia's most-read articles of 2025 – Wikimedia Foundation
New Wikipedia data shows the events, people, movies, and more that captured global attention in 2025.
https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2025/12/02/announcing-wikipedias-most-read-articles-of-2025/?utm_source=join1440&utm_medium=email&utm_placement=newsletter&user_id=673bc941e207d5515a00e7bf
0
0
1
you reached the end!!
feeds!
log in