loading . . . Yet another filler episode Hello, dear reader, and welcome to another issue of _AI, Law, and Otter Things_! In recent weeks, I have not had much to share, as I have been focused on my job search and my ongoing manuscript. One of these things is out of the way now, and I will hopefully make progress with the other in the upcoming weeks, so here's hoping I get back to my usual posting rhythm. In the meantime, here's another issue on the the short side of things.
If you are somehow curious about technology-neutral regulation, next week I will give not one but two talks covering parts of my book-in-progress:
* On **Tuesday** (14 April), I will be in Tilburg (and online) for a TILT Seminar. There, I will present the overall argument of the book, with a focus on how and why I believe we should emphasize the question of delegation when analysing technology neutrality.
* On **Wednesday** (15 April), I will speak at the Amsterdam Law and Technology Institute (in-person only) about technology-neutral regulation, this time emphasizing its impact throughout the various moments of the policy process.
In the meantime, today's issue starts with a bit of self-reflection about my job applications and the kind of scholarship I do. After that, there is a slightly-longer-than-usual section with reading recommendations, followed by some open calls and events. Then, of course, what everybody is here for–a cute otter. Hope you enjoy!
## Looking at my writing patterns
One of the most awkward parts of job applications is having to sell myself. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a particularly self-effacing person (quite the contrary, actually), but I find it difficult to find a balance between 'stating the obvious' and 'bringing relevant information to the fore'. Still, I really like the idea of having a salary in the long run, so the last few monts have seen quite a bit of self-assessment in my part.
What I'd see as the biggest challenge of my applications was how to position myself as a scholar. On the one hand, regular readers of this newsletter are probably tired of reading about how I am less and less interested in the direct engagement with technical matters. This does not mean I am no longer interested in the relationship between law and technology, but rather that I am looking at it from different perspectives. On the other hand, most of my publications until very recently deal with these 'under the hood' aspects of technology regulation, so moving too far away from that makes me less attractive as a candidate to hire. So, an important part of this application season has been to find a balance I can live with. And, although I am now comfortable with my answer, I failed miserably at conveying it in some of the interviews I took part on.
This reflection about the road ahead also led me to examine how my future interests align with the kind of scholarship I produce. As of today, I believe most (if not all) of my publications can fit into one of the three following categories:
* **Conceptual plumbing**(with apologies to Mary Midgley): in this kind of publication, I engage with a theoretical concept we use, show how it is being used in somewhat sloppy ways, and propose how and why we should be different. My monograph on technology-neutral regulation is an example of that approach, as well as my earlier work on automated decision-making.
* **Interdisciplinary translation** : here, I try to articulate broad readings across disciplines for one of two purposes.
* In the first, I make the case that something that is being discussed by a particular scholarly community is relevant for another. For example, a book chapter I'm currently working on tries to show that insights from the policy learning literature can be useful for the governance of innovation.
* In the second, I argue that an apparent convergence in terminology disguises differences in concepts. This is, for example, the main takeaway of my various works on transparency: that what the law expects from AI technologies does not line up nicely with what technical disciplines expect or aim to provide with their methods.
* **Doctrinal analysis** : my approach to doctrine is heavily informed by other disciplines, but ultimately seeks to read legal texts in light of the internal logic of the legal system in which they are deployed. Maybe the clearest example of that is my article with Nicolas Petit on the AI Act, where we mobilize a variety of sources but focus on presenting the legal framework and the ensuing interpretation challenges.
As this breakdown suggests, I am pretty much interested in theory and methods of the law. I believe one cannot advance in such discussions without having a connection to what is actually going on, which is why I tend to collaborate with people from different perspectives and engage in my own doctrinal work. Even so, knowing my strengths and limitations can be useful when trying to figure out what I can bring to the table. So, doing this exercise has helped me quite a bit as I prepared for job interviews.
## Recommendations
Another season of _For All Mankind_ is now being released in weekly installments on Apple TV. As the show moves into the future, it gets sillier and sillier, especially as some of the characters from the very first season are still central to the plot. Nonetheless, it offers a much more uplifting take on the future than the dystopias that now dominate the offer of sci-fi shows.
As for professional stuff, you might want to take a look at:
* Siraj Anand and others, ‘Digital Sovereignty and the Means to European Digital Security: Identification of the Goals Related to Digital Sovereignty from Legal Texts Published by the European Union’ [2026] European Security early access
* Maha Rafi Atal and others, ‘Oligarchic Sovereignty: Technology and the Future of Global Order’ (2026) 52 Review of International Studies 1
* Deirdre Curtin and Tommaso Fia, ‘Cracking AI Secrecy: (Beyond) EU Migration Law and Governance’ [2026] European Law Open FirstView.
* Stephen John, ‘Weber’s Elephant: Rethinking Science Advice’ [2025] The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
* Olia Kanevskaia Whitaker, ‘From National to European - And Back Again: Fixing the Flaws of the New Approach’ (Social Science Research Network, 30 March 2026)
* Indira Latorre, ‘The Global Dimension of Domestic Regulatory Agencies: Why Do We Need a Networked Perspective of Political Legitimacy?’ (2025) 21 Journal of International Political Theory 32
* Joana Mendes, ‘Beyond Shared Foundations: General Principles of EU Law, EU Values and the Perils of Forward Leaps’ (2025) 4 European Law Open 613
* Horatia Muir Watt and Geoffrey Samuel, Producing Legal Knowledge: Comparative Methods, Models and Schemes (Edward Elgar Publishing 2026)
* Alba Ribera Martínez, ‘The Slippery Slope of Data Rooms’ (Social Science Research Network, 8 April 2026)
* Petros Terzis, Anushka Mittal and Joris van Hoboken, ‘The Many Shades of Clouds: How Law Fails (Us) in Seeing Power in the Digital Economy’ [2026] Regulation & Governance early access
* Anna Tzanaki and Julian Nowag, ‘The Institutional Framework of the Digital Markets Act: A Novel but Thoughtful Experiment in Regulatory Design?’ [2026] Journal of European Competition Law & Practice lpag008
## Opportunities
_Disclaimer: as usual, I am gathering these links purely for convenience and because I think they might be of interest to readers of this newsletter. Unless I explicitly say otherwise, I am not involved with any of the selection processes indicated below._
The 21st IFIP Summer School on Privacy and Identity Management will take place from 10 to 14 August 2026 in Leuven (Belgium) with the working theme of 'Regulation and Innovation: Catalysts or Antagonists?'. This school has an interdisicplinary outlook, combining perspectives from computer science, the social sciences, and law. Submit your extended abstract by **30 April**!
The Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (the Netherlands) is hiring two assistant or associate professors in Cybersecurity. Apply by **19 April**.
The São Paulo School of Advanced Science on Regulatory Governance invites applications for a 10-day course (between 3 and 13 August) on regulation in Latin America. This is a fascinating programme, and applications are due by **30 April**.
PLSC-Europe will take place in Leuven this year, from 29 to 30 October 2026. They invite abstracts until **15 May**.
Back to Leiden, the ICON-S Benelux Conference 2026 will take place on 26 and 27 October, with the theme 'Trust in Transition: Public Law in a Changing World'. Submit your abstract by **29 May**.
The editors of RSS: Data Science and Artificial Intelligence invite submissions for an upcoming Special Issue: 'Uncertainty in the Era of AI'. Submissions are due by **30 May**.
## And now, the otter
Photo by Silvia H / Unsplash
Hope you found something interesting above, and please consider subscribing if you haven’t done so already:
Subscribe
Thanks for your attention! Do not hesitate to hit “reply” to this email or contact me elsewhere to discuss some topic I raise in the newsletter. Likewise, let me know if there is a job opening, event, or publication that might be of interest to me or to the readers of this newsletter. Hope to see you next time! https://blog.marcoalmada.com/yet-another-filler-episode/
