This is such brazen censorship. It’s all right there in the open, a quintessential jawboning case, the lawsuit writes itself.

We partnered with these amazing legal, privacy & tech accountability experts on an amicus brief for a case about how Meta’s design choices allegedly harmed kids. At Cybersecurity for Democracy, we conduct scientific research to show how these systems work & what accountability can look like. More 👇🏼

Thanks to @epic.org for leading the way, to @comminsense.bsky.social and TJLP for this collaboration, and the below legal scholars, who signed on in support. What a team! cc: @whiskeyocelot.bsky.social & @meganiorio.bsky.social bsky.app/profile/mega...

EPIC collaborated w/ @commonsensemedia.bsky.social, Cybersecurity for Democracy (@yaeleisenstat.bsky.social @whiskeyocelot.bsky.social) & Tech Justice Law Project on a brief telling the Ninth Circuit to deny Meta Section 230 protections for its allegedly addictive design. 11 legal scholars joined!

SCOTUS's decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton today properly leaves legislatures with room to provide kids with heightened protections online but does not go far enough in incentivizing legislatures to prescribe privacy-protective age assurance methods. epic.org/supreme-cour...

The California Age-Appropriate Design Code case is back in the 9th Circuit. Did NetChoice remedy the flaws the Ninth Circuit ID'ed the first time around? Nope. But the district court granted a full injunction anyway—endorsing yet another bad legal theory that endangers long-established privacy laws

BIG NEWS! This afternoon, Governor Phil Scott signed the Vermont Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) into law! governor.vermont.gov/press-releas...

Also super telling that the Searchlight guy thinks that angering a key Dem constituency is a good thing. My guy you sound like the absolute worst political strategist and all you are going to do is help Dems lose harder.

EPIC applauds the passage of Vermont Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) today: epic.org/epic-applaud...

⚠️ NetChoice v. Bonta: An oral argument explainer 🧵 EPIC Senior Counsel Megan Iorio (@meganiorio.bsky.social) and EPIC Counsel Tom McBrien (@tommcbrien.bsky.social) broke down key areas of argument ahead of today’s Ninth Circuit hearing of NetChoice v. Bonta: epic.org/ninth-circui...

Ninth Circuit oral argument in NetChoice's challenge to CA's addictive feed law is coming up in a few minutes. We @epic.org put together a quick preview of the argument. epic.org/ninth-circui...

All of that to say he didn’t like what she said in her op-ed so he sent goons to disappear her off the street.

A Tufts University student has been kidnapped for ICE because a year ago, she co-authored this op-ed which criticizes Israel, calls for the adoption of non-binding faculty senate resolutions, and celebrates the end of apartheid in South Africa www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024...

Thanks Prem for amplifying! Please sign onto this Columbia boycott (with a carve out for departments and people targeted). We cannot proceed with business as usual. We cannot give colloquia on a campus that's colluding with authoritarians dragging their students off campus.

The "Is it a constitutional crisis yet?!" discussion is so absurd: Of course you can construct increasingly esoteric definitions for why this current moment doesn't meet your exact criteria yet. But meanwhile, this is where we are: Masked agents of the states abducting people for writing op-eds.

In today’s one-two punch, the @aaup.bsky.social National alongside MESA & 3 of our chapters also sued the Trump administration over their unconstitutional ideological-deportation policies that have chilled speech & dissent on campuses nationwide. www.aaup.org/news/aaup-al...

👏

My analysis of the decision issued yesterday in the CA Age-Appropriate Design Code case. Short of it is that the First Amendment analysis is wrong and unnecessary and the judge shouldn’t have opined on the constitutional questions at all b/c the case could have been decided on severability.

Fuck yeah Georgetown Law, this is how you stand up to threats from an authoritarian regime. As an alumna, I knew Martin has picked a fight with the wrong school. GULC is deeply committed to the critical study of law & supports students pursuing public interest in ways other top schools don’t.

With his permission, I'm sharing Dean Treanor's response to Ed Martin's letter:

When will Democrats learn you can’t out-Republican the Republicans but you can deploy populism to address the actual problems we’re facing. Trump is dismantling democracy, he is screwing with your social security, he is shredding the freedom to speak, and he’s making every damn one of us less safe.

🚨 EPIC, @democracyforward.bsky.social, and a federal worker filed suit today against DOGE over its illegal seizure of personnel records and payment system data—actions which constitute the largest data breach in American history. 🧵 Read our full complaint here: epic.org/wp-content/u...

The Ninth Circuit has enjoined California's law regulating addictive feeds pending appeal. No opinion attached. Merits briefing in the appeal will proceed on an expedited schedule (completed by mid-to-late March) and hopefully we won't have to wait too long for the Ninth Circuit to rule thereafter.

Of all the blatantly unconstitutional things Trump is up to this is up at the top of the list. Yet because it’s about people speaking in support of Palestinian human rights what do you want to bet it doesn’t get the attention that other Trump actions have.

Key takeaways from the TikTok v. Garland decision from @epic.org penned by my colleague @tommcbrien.bsky.social

If you're looking for a preview of this morning's argument in SCOTUS, here you go.

Supreme Court arguments in the Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton case are Wednesday. Here’s a look at how the case might impact kids online safety laws, and why the Court should take a Moody v. NetChoice-style approach to deciding the case.

If the New York Times announced it was changing its entire editorial strategy to appease the incoming president it would signal the death of independent editorial discretion. When a tech oligarch does it, it somehow bolsters free expression? www.nytimes.com/2025/01/07/b...

Check out this amicus! The PA Supreme Court has an opportunity to make online contracting much more prosocial by requiring informed consent. Added bonus, tech companies will be incentivized to limit contract terms to limit friction, so less click wrapped bullshit.

Here's NetChoice's motion for an injunction pending appeal in the Ninth Circuit in the SB 976 (addictive feeds) case. In each successive motion, NetChoice is making little tweaks to their argument that the addictive feeds provision regulates expression. epic.org/wp-content/u...

Well, it was a good two days—district court places California’s addictive feed law on hold through Feb 2 pending appellate proceedings.

NetChoice just moved for an injunction pending appeal in the SB 976 (addictive feeds) case. They're big mad that the court supposedly disregarded binding SCOTUS precedent that addictive feeds are expressive (Moody v. NetChoice). They are wrong & here's why 🧵 (Motion here: epic.org/wp-content/u...)

California's regulation of addictive feeds will go into effect tomorrow, thanks to Judge Davila's decision denying in part NetChoice's request to enjoin SB 976. The restrictions on notifications & the compelled disclosure provisions were put on hold. More at link & below. epic.org/judge-allows...

We have an exciting opportunity for you to have a huge impact on EPIC’s work to defend privacy, human rights, and democracy – generous donors have stepped up to TRIPLE your end-of-year gift! That means that if you give $100, you are generating $300 of much-needed support for EPIC! ➡️ epic.org/donate

BREAKING: ❤️Fight Director @evangreer.bsky.social confronts Rep Mace (R-SC) on her anti-trans bigotry at Project Liberty Summit. Statement here: www.fightforthefuture.org/news/2024-11...

Why does Carr think Section 230 gives the FCC authority to investigate whether social media companies are moderating content in good faith??? Section 230 is a defense to claims, it's not an affirmative duty to moderate content in good faith. nypost.com/2024/11/18/b...