“'I’ve never experienced anything like this in my entire life,' the congresswoman said, fighting back tears. "She described the way people were laying down inside as “like sardines.” “'It is frightening in there,' she said. 'It is disgusting'..." azmirror.com/2026/04/10/i...

Hamburger's column can be dismissed with Hitchens' Razor: what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. Hamburger cites only those writing in support of the administration, but offers no evidence or research of his own. Therefore it is not worthy of comment.

I'm on the train back to DC – I call on all my colleagues to come back, too. Congress must vote to end this war IMMEDIATELY.

Credit where credit is due: Congressional Democrats showed up during recess - they came back early - to introduce a war powers resolution. Republicans blocked it.

Republicans block effort to halt Trump's war with Iran after 'civilization' threat House Democrats tried to force a vote on a war powers resolution during recess. Senate Democrats will launch a more serious attempt to rein in Trump next week.

My plea to Democrats in Congress is this: get back to Washington. Even if you can't gavel in from recess. Even if you don't have a quorum. Even if another war powers resolution vote fails. It's not enough to Tweet. Get inside the building and show the world you are trying. NOW!

6. I erred on the side of generosity last night. I checked and assumed that he had made one change without telling us. I wanted to accept this small gesture, so I deleted many of my posts yesterday. I was wrong. These errors have not been corrected.

I was wrong - He did not correct his mischaracterization of our amicus brief about Roma, nor did he correct his claim about the 1866 debates. I checked the main article, and I forgot his wrong claim was in his "Response": papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

#BULawProf @jedshug.bsky.social's SCOTUS birthright citizenship amicus brief: “the plain meaning at the time of ratification, the Reconstruction debates and the common law history all demonstrate that children of transient aliens or unlawful entrants are citizens.” ➡️ www.nytimes.com/2026/04/01/o...

At the beginning of Trump's second term, many in the odd coalition of antitrust populists still had hope that aggressive enforcement would continue, albeit with changes. At the antitrust bar's annual convening in DC last week, that hope seemed deflated www.theverge.com/policy/90522...

I talked with @mjsdc.bsky.social about what is looking like a 7-2 or maybe even 8-1 decision against the anti-birthright EO. And now I am going to shut up about this for awhile because I don‘t want to screw anything up. slate.com/podcasts/ami...

We haven’t had enough praise of people who are doing good historical work, especially younger folks getting their start. Let me say @btkeener.bsky.social has really impressed me lately, and y’all should keep an eye on his work.

When @gregsargent.bsky.social writes that Trump's arguments are "based on lawyerly hocus pocus," I'm honored he links to our amicus, providing history, not MAGA magical thinking. @evanbernick.bsky.social @brendanbenedict.bsky.social @mike-altebrando.bsky.social newrepublic.com/article/2084...

"The Birthright Con" Excellent @nytimes.com essay previewing today's birthright citizenship arguments by @jamellebouie.net (and not just for quoting the amicus brief from @evanbernick.bsky.social @brendanbenedict.bsky.social @mike-altebrando.bsky.social and me) www.nytimes.com/2026/04/01/o...

Did Randy Barnett not read the briefs? Did he skip over the exchange between Cowan and Conness? Or the many other statements supporting the traditional rule?

In his draft paper, Kurt Lash says that our amicus brief in Trump v. Barbara at p.27 claims "that Republicans viewed . . . the Romani as illegally in the United States". What it actually mentions is "England’s historical exclusions against the Roma people" Still no correction.

we said what we said @anthonymkreis.bsky.social www.motherjones.com/politics/202...

this is a very good brief and by virtue of its argumentative force persuasively rebuts the idea that it was a mistake to engage at the originalist level

“You’re a coward. And a clown.” The threats and bare-knuckle tactics of MAGA’s most powerful antitrust fixer.

MUST SEE TV 1pm ET, 10am PT A hearing on most dangerous merger in U.S. history: Paramount-Warners Chaired by @schiff.senate.gov w/ superstar witnesses like Noah Wyle, @jimacosta.bsky.social & Jax Deluca They will explain why the merger must & WILL be stopped! www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ubgs...

By the time you finish watching this video, you'll be able to explain the potential Warner Brothers-Paramount deal like an expert.

Next Tuesday, 3/17 at noon ET I will be speaking on this panel hosted by the DC Bar on the #ftcvmeta trial that I attended last year for the Big Tech on Trial Substack. There are great panelists including @tarap.bsky.social Dan Gilman, Joseph Coniglio & Justin Katz

4/ @evanbernick.bsky.social and I have posted our amicus brief, "An Originalist Defense of Birthright Citizenship" on SSRN, with our deepest gratitiude to @brendanbenedict.bsky.social & @mike-altebrando.bsky.social as our counsel who added so much substance: papers.ssrn.com/abstract=635...

In a brief from the originalist legal scholars Evan Bernick and Jed Shugerman, the authors argue that Trump's interpretation of the 14th Amendment is based on dubious claims of the text's original meaning. https://loom.ly/RPK4hdo

Quite proud of this brief I worked on—filed on behalf of eight immigrant rights orgs—which points out the disconnect between the govt’s legal theory of birthright and the terms of the EO, which would affect millions of people with deep ties to our country. www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...

Great brief, really enjoyed reading through this - Very nice work @nbaron.bsky.social and team.

this is a great brief and it appropriately ends with a killshot: the simple observation that if trump's meaning held, the birthright clause would not have overturned dred scott, the one thing it was absolutely meant to do.

Thank you, Akiva. More credit goes to @brendanbenedict.bsky.social @mike-altebrando.bsky.social and @evanbernick.bsky.social I'm really proud of our teamwork here. I love this closing paragraph (and I didn't write it, nor did I write the killer intro, which I also love).

3/ I provide more detailed evidence in support of Part IV in this article, with the support of many legal scholars before me: "An Originalist Case for Birthright Citizenship: The Inclusion of 'Temporary Sojourners' and of Chinese and Roma" forthcoming UC L. J. 2026 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Pretty straightforward from here

With the outstanding teamwork with Brendan Benedict and Michael Altebrando, @evanbernick.bsky.social & I proudly filed this originalist amicus brief defending birthright citizenship in Trump v. Barbara: www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...

The latest Monopoly Report podcast! Alan Chapell w antitrust litigator Brendan Benedict, discussing the civil antitrust lawsuits being filed against Google by publishers and adtech companies. www.monopolyreportpod.com/

Meta prevailed in court today as a judge ruled its earlier monopoly claims don’t hold now that Facebook trails TikTok and YouTube. @brendanbenedict.bsky.social joins Ian Masters to break down the decision. Listen wherever you stream your podcasts. on.soundcloud.com/TldAFKLa3itD...

This week, our legal team filed an amicus brief calling on the Supreme Court to take up the case challenging Merck’s deceptive practices to preserve its mumps vaccine monopoly. Find the brief here: www.openmarketsinstitute.org/publications...

With my comment to @ashleybelanger.bsky.social

Preview of what to expect at the major Facebook trial that begins Monday. Big Tech on Trial will provide daily coverage. 👇

💔 Match Group dominates the online dating market — and critics say it’s forcing users to look for love in all the wrong places.