I will vote for a platform of de-Trumpification. It needs to be a scorched-earth removal of every hateful symbol.

There is no fucking way I would want that guy's name and face on my passport. Shouldn't even be legal.

The new racist double standard set up by Alito in the TPS ruling: if there’s any other motive in addition to the racism, the racism doesn’t count, but if the state wants to *prevent* discrimination against black people, that is racist and unconstitutional www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...

We should be grateful, in a way, that this court has given us so many ways to come at these rulings and get them reversed, if the court can ever be uncaptured.

Parents can effectively force schools to drop any reading including lgbtq+ people, but hey, Texas is doing this www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...

When Republicans say "this is a Christian nation" what they are saying religious freedom for me, not for thee, and their intent to create the conditions necessary for suppressing religious freedom. They are doing that right now in fact. ballsandstrikes.org/scotus/lando...

Sorry, why are we getting news about Trump's musings from the market where he makes millions betting on the direction of policies he controls?

I’ve got a piece in the @nytimes.com this morning about the court’s appalling decision allowing the administration to terminate TPS without following the legally required steps - & in the face of considerable evidence of unconstitutional racial bias www.nytimes.com/2026/06/26/o...

"...however on the white nationalist blogs I hung out on in 2023, this was all over the place."

The lawyer for Dominic Pezzola, the man who did this to the Capitol on Jan. 6, while senators were evacuating, compares the widely documented attack to a 1960s sit-in at Woolworth's. s3.documentcloud.org/documents/28...

The answer is that you take them seriously because he's the president. A few cryptic words from Alan Greenspan could calm (or crater) global markets. There's nothing Trump says that you discard as insignificant.

Disagree strongly with Alito here. Describing bad conditions in another country 'harshly' (i.e. without empathy) is almost definitionally going to involve racism.

Yesterday’s gun case proves again that the Bruen test is dangerous, absurd, and incoherent. No other country in the world would resolves legal issues this way and for good reason. www.dorfonlaw.org/2026/06/the-...

Recalling that Biden warned about the Ukraine invasion well in advance: www.theguardian.com/world/2026/j...

How it started: How it's going:

It will only *look * like he's saying that. No one should be under any illusion that this court won't come after birthright citizens too. It is fundamental to the conservative project they are advancing.

SCOTUS Justice Amy Coney Barrett has 2 Black Haitian kids who she adopted. Today she ruled to expel 700K Haitians who were here legally. Proximity to white supremacy is not protection from white supremacy. And proximity to Black and brown people is not exemption from being a fascist and racist.

This. Current Dem leadership has presided over a massive backwards slide in rights and freedoms in this country, and expect to be rewarded at the polls anyway simply because they aren't Republicans—as if that's enough. It's not.

Ironically, Italians, like many other ethnic groups, were able to assimilate in part by adopting the same attitudes towards Black people as the predominant 'white' culture, thus showing that they were worthy of inclusion in it (and further cementing the caste of Black people who preceded them).

Democrats should be talking about what is wrong with this court. Not necessarily even about solutions, but just showing us they recognize the problems here and calling the FedSoc majority out on its patent BS.

As if he's proud of how corrupt the Trump administration is www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...

You've afghaned your last whig

The Supreme Court is handing Trump a blank check for his cruel agenda to expel those fleeing violence and disaster. This is not commonsense reform — it’s only fueling Trump’s desire to attack people because of their skin color.

Federal agencies can pre-empt state law, especially now that those agencies are 1) subject to presidential loyalty demands and 2) prone to being undercut by a Supreme Court no longer bound by Chevron. Good luck not getting cancer or poisoned y'all.

100%. No way this gets done without the Trump clan getting a taste.

Anyone who believes that this court will treat all religions fairly and equally under the law now has even more cause to reconsider.

But she's right.

The Roberts court loves to overrule precedent 1) with a blatant partisan split and 2) without acknowledging doing so.

And was moving pretty fast when he did

Donald Duck (killer)

"As a United States Senator, I am totally powerless to shape the contours of government and cannot be considered responsible for anything."

A color-blind constitution is a blind constitution.

Yes!! (finally) Hoping the panel comes back soundly against the abuses of Judges Rao, Katsas and Walker

Starmer’s resignation is a warning, but we’ve run this experiment at home. Sinema, Golden, and Fetterman made the same bet: that poll-tested moderation is a safe harbor. All saw their support crater. In a moment like this, tacking right isn’t the safe play, it’s the thing that sinks you.

Another step towards cementing a constitutional republic into a monarchy

The most 'pro-life' court ever assembled

'Sentimental' is not something one normally associates with stock holdings. Strange that Sam feels more empathy for his brokerage account than for everyday Americans.

It should be lost on no one that Iran is doing to Trump what Trump hinself always does: stringing him along and then yanking the rug out from under, over and over.

Have said before but to repeat: anything less than an unequivocal affirmation of precedent will a step towards taking this right away - likely as part of a roughly planned long-term strategy Also: This SCOTUS would *not* have taken this case just to affirm precedent.

Free speech conservatism

Outrageous.   Dr. Justin Ryder, a pediatric surgeon and expert at Northwestern, was booted from a conference for sharing an article on federal cuts to biomedical research.   This is the impact of Trump's administration.

I know it’s just an advanced reader copy, but look at this beauty!! Thank you so much for sending, @sonyabonczek.bsky.social! (Sonya’s the one to ask if you’re looking for one!)

I guess it's not really a security or intelligence risk if you already tell the Qataris everything they want to know anyway...

A 22-year-old just got a $30 million investment valuing his new futures exchange at $300 million. He graduated Stanford, wrote for Thiel's Stanford Review, interned at Andreessen Horowitz. His mom? Pro-crypto Sen. Gillibrand, D-NY. Bipartisan capture in full bloom. fortune.com/2026/06/18/t...

The flying security breach?

Know who didn't? The guy named 'Christian'

Just wow. Voted for her in '16 and would in the same contest again, but wonder what Hillary stans have to say to this. Incredible.

Stupid has consequences

Someone refresh my memory: did Obama's agreement include a $300Bn payment and a toll on all oil through the Strait?