Corinna Turbes and I discuss comments submitted to the NIH Office of Science Policy Request for Information on Article Processing Charges from the lens of dispelling myths about public access at The National Institutes of Health in Upstream by FORCE11: https://doi.org/10.54900/6m4xn-y3m49

Attending the Open Science Fair this month? Join our Head of Publishing, Fiona Hutton, on Sept 17 as she explains why it’s time to embrace more meaningful approaches to research assessment: buff.ly/FC06AfH

💻 #F1000 Blog Post Associate Publisher Emma Smith talks about F1000's open peer review model and how open peer review processes can benefit authors, reviewers, and the wider research community. Read now: spr.ly/63321fAyMT#F1000 #OpenResearch #OpenAccess #PeerReview

Curious about the future of #ResearchAssessment? Hear from leaders shaping change at #OSFair2025: national perspectives, @coarassessment.bsky.social #OpenScience in action, responsible AI & open scholarly communication. 📍17 Sept | @cern.bsky.social 🔗https://www.opensciencefair.eu/registration-2025

Are you an early-career researcher (or someone hoping to help ECRs) working in #openscience or #metascience? The @reproducibilitea.org podcast is looking for guests for our next season of episodes! We'd love to feature ECR voices foremost – the next generation of scientists should be heard the most!

The Knowledge Exchange and @researchconsulting.bsky.social activity Alternative Publishing Platforms has now published its research questions and approach via Octopus! tinyurl.com/KENews03072025

One thing you can do today to save time in the future? Bookmarking 📑 these #openscience publishing tools. I did all the heavy lifting for you -> https://annaclemens.com/blog/open-science-publishing-access-tools/ #AcademicWriting #PhDLife #PhDchat

Journals don't filter research, they stratify it. The Publish-Review-Curate model relies on open discussion, not misplaced trust. Publish: Post research as a preprint Review: Public reviews inform wider discussion of research Curate: Community recommendations elifesciences.org/inside-elife...

We did something radical that shouldn’t feel radical: we stopped funding science built for journals so that we can reimagine scientific publishing. First @arcadiascience.com. Now at @asterainstitute.bsky.social.

Join us for a July Community Call to discuss reimagining scholarly communication! 📝 ‪@brembs.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy‬ will discuss replacing traditional journals with decentralized, community-governed infrastructure. 🔗 Register us02web.zoom.us/meeting/regi...

How can we rethink and reorganise #ScholarlyCommunication to better advance science? What is the role of #PeerReview? Should #Preprints take centre stage? onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... #AcademicSky #OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity @elife.bsky.social @learnedpublishing.bsky.social

Great opportunity to hear about PubPeer from founder @brandonstell.bsky.social - sometimes controversial, PubPeer has undoubtedly been force for more rigorous science 👏

A vision of the future? #ScholarlyPublishing 2035 "They replaced impact factors, the h-index, and other esteem indicators associated with commercial academic publishing with more nuanced metrics..." www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Does publishing serve science or is science serving publishing? Damian Pattinson and I (@elife.bsky.social) argue scientific publishing has evolved into a system that, rather than facilitate scholarly communication, distorts and dictates it. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... #OpenScience