@damianpattinson.bsky.social
📤 81
📥 161
📝 3
reposted by
LSE Impact Blog
about 16 hours ago
👀ICYMI: "Binary decisions are inevitable, in the choice to read, cite, or disregard something, but they are not fit as proxies for scientific validity"
@georgealfredcurrie.bsky.social
&
@damianpattinson.bsky.social
#OpenResearch
#PeerReview
#AcademicChatter
loading . . .
We need to move beyond the accept/reject binary in peer review - LSE Impact
Binary reject/accept peer review has become conflated with validation. The authors outline three myths sustaining this confusion and how we might escape it.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/02/02/we-need-to-move-beyond-the-accept-reject-binary-in-peer-review/
0
6
4
New piece by
@georgealfredcurrie.bsky.social
and me about the problems with equating journal acceptance with scientific validity. This is what we're trying to challenge at eLife, but many disagree. Is it because of opposition to the arguments, or entrenched culture?
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...
loading . . .
We need to move beyond the accept/reject binary in peer review - LSE Impact
Binary reject/accept peer review has become conflated with validation. The authors outline three myths sustaining this confusion and how we might escape it.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2026/02/02/we-need-to-move-beyond-the-accept-reject-binary-in-peer-review/
6 days ago
0
5
2
This is a great example of how the eLife model better reflects how science works in practice, with uncertainty and debate as a core part of how our understanding progresses.
add a skeleton here at some point
3 months ago
0
2
0
you reached the end!!
feeds!
log in
