Don’t you hate upstairs neighbors?

Who is teaching predatory journal emailers English. “Heartily good day to you” bro do you want me to publish in the Canterbury Tales.

Getting real sick of AI music getting recommended to me.

wow — the preprint host, arxiv, is banning authors for a year if they submit papers with hallucinated citations 🤖

Imagine group therapy but HARDCORE and CANCELLED

This is unhealthy, irresponsible, and is going to get people stalked if not killed

Is there any research on whether AI is used more for platonic or intimate relationships? My mind says intimate are more common but I literally don’t know.

A student asked me today if I’m ever upset when I’m grading homework and frankly it’s rare I’m ever not upset when I’m dealing with the vast majority of this work.

So much science is moving forward because grad students are taking on peer review that senior faculty are not interested in. And a nonzero amount of this is probably scientific malpractice since grad students don’t have as much experience finding paper red flags. We live in a society.

This Friday (3/27) at 3pm Eastern, I'm going to have @leshner.bsky.social on the channel! Connor is a SUPER cool psychologist who'll be sharing some of his work on parasocial relationships with fictional characters, and doing a Q&A with chat! Hope to see you there! www.youtube.com/live/nKPERrl...

My favorite part of this music video is when the backup singers sound like the screech of a banshee

It fascinates me that humans want this connection so much. It's SETI on planet Earth. And that there's an openness to consciousness in machines, but less so* to identifying it in most sentient, intelligent, socially complex non-human animals. *I'm talking public, not researchers in either case

A short Bluetorial on plots of NIH application success rates as a function of percentile. 1/20

Coming to terms with the possibility that referring to myself as a “dogshit writer” is no longer a statement of fact and instead an unfounded (mostly) expression of imposter syndrome. Signed, expected 2027 Dr. Leshner

Are you going to #SPSP2026? Do you like talking about #AI and the future of relationships? Do you want to have something in common with my #wife? You should come to my symposium on Thursday the 26th! Join 57 of your closest (proximally) colleagues at a series of talks that will be funducational!

Friend has done research on this and found that hostile sexism predicted interest in sexual relationships, but disinterest in friendships with AI doi.org/10.1177/0265... #PsycSciSky #SocialPsych

As a bald man, I refuse to listen to new age sociotechnological posturing from someone who is maintaining that hairline.

Oh no I accidentally gave myself existentialism by playing and reading the wrong combination of video game and book, respectively.

www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12... Is it me or does this all just read like bad time travel fiction

I just received a review that was really really mean but had a great info in it about how to improve my paper. It’s really hard to keep going back to that review to pull the important insights when I have to read between the lines. It’s an interesting dichotomy that academia can be so (un)helpful.

Got a paper reject where reviewer 1 said I overlooked a chapter in a handbook I should’ve included, and when I went to get the book from my uni library, the librarian told me not a single library in the entirety of Canada has this ($200) book. Kinda betrays anonymity/definition of expertise.

Every academic conference in the US is now fucked-fucked, lol.

I follow some conservatives who do polling and data analysis because I’m fascinated with how they interpret their numbers and the only thing more fascinating than their policy positions is how all the data interpretations they use to justify their positions are wrong.

Financial decision of “video game where the main selling point is ‘player makes decisions’ is now immutable tv show” shows how amazing the media market is at this time.

I spoke extensively with the Crimson reporter. She understood the strength of the evidence, and it shows. Odds ratios can be eye-glazing, but let's just say that when 2.5 million kids are studied, and it's still not possible to detect added risk from taking acetaminophen...there's no added risk.

The eye exam is the perfect game design. That big E is a great tutorial that teaches you the basic mechanic. But it doesn't baby you and quickly gets hard as they introduce the small and blurry enemies.

Why, because it’s lame and overwritten?

When the dust settles, and if universities have meaningfully survived, it will be worth asking how institutions usually so resistant to thoroughgoing change chose to leap with both feet into an untested technology they didn't understand and didn't know how to use.

Does anyone know how to use index match in excel

The creation of Adam

I get this question a lot. I don't have strong views on how transmasc people should dress, but since I often get the question, I've thought about it a bit. Will share some thoughts in this thread. 🧵

Really incredible story unraveling in this thread, where Amazon and other sites have seemingly been able to sell an academic textbook that was withdrawn in 2021 and never actually printed or published, without the knowledge of the press, editors or contributors. Something has gone deeply wrong!

won sshrc :)

Surely we’ll hear something from sshrc doctoral tomorrow… right???

hits a little different this morning

A key difference here is that while either can be incorrect, the structure of Wikipedia *creates context* and the structure of LLMs *destroys context* Wikipedia has linked sources and an edit history showing where information came from and who added it when An LLM just generates text

The next pope needs to reply to every email like Chomsky used to.

The Wikipedia for papabile (candidates for the next pope) has betting odds for who will become the next pope on it. All I can say is JFC.

I’m sorry but if your students use AI to write papers and you use AI to grade them zero school is happening. You are running together on a hamster wheel

This one is stressing me out.

Growing up, we were explicitly told not to cite directly from Wikipedia because we didn’t know where the info was coming from. Now that we have an actual black box disinformation machine, everyone is suddenly gung-ho on information gathering.

I’ve long used FiveThirtyEight’s interactive “Hack Your Way To Scientific Glory” to illustrate the idea of p-hacking when I teach statistics. But ABC/Disney killed the site earlier this month :( So I made my own with #rstats and Observable and #QuartoPub ! stats.andrewheiss.com/hack-your-way/

I suppose if a Texas state legislator wanted to know more about the behavior of furries they could ask the Texas A&M professor who wrote a book on it www.tamuc.edu/news/tamuc-f...

Does anyone have a good paper that reports chi-squares? I need some inspiration for formatting.