She didn't just "take part," she was carrying the flag and leading attacks.

I don't buy Marjorie Taylor Greene's sudden "transformation" for one second. If anything, I think her duplicity makes her more dangerous than ever.

NEW: Epstein survivors release the most powerful PSA I have ever seen. Make this go viral so every member of the House of Representatives sees it.

The Presidency was never intended to be a safe haven for criminals.

Epstein wrote of Trump: "i have met some very bad people ,, none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body.. so yes – dangerous."

Your reminder that ICE agents are still breaking laws and violating the Constitution to advance the agenda of a white supremacist.

If Trump is innocent, why are they still doing everything they can to prevent the Epstein files from ever seeing the light of day?

Can the next please dear God can the next interviewer ask MTG about oh I don’t know January 6th etc before we keep pretending she found politics Jesus

Massie: "The president has been saying this is a hoax. Well, he's just now decided to investigate a hoax, if it's a hoax. And I have another concern about these investigations he's announced. If they have ongoing investigations, those documents can't be released. So this might be a big smokescreen."

BREAKING: Twenty-four survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s crimes have issued an emotional and urgent appeal to the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, demanding that Congress vote to release the long-awaited Epstein files. meidasnews.com/news/survivo...

Trump and his buddies wouldn't be fighting to block everything if there wasn't something career ending at stake.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the Epstein emails "prove absolutely nothing," but what she fails to say is that the emails are only the dirty tip of the iceberg.

Epstein wrote of Trump: "i have met some very bad people ,, none as bad as trump. not one decent cell in his body.. so yes – dangerous."

Epstein on Trump: "yes thx. its wild. because I am the one able to take him down."

This is a better answer than I gave on The Source to @kaitlancollins.bsky.social last night.

Trump siccing the DOJ onto his political opponents in the Epstein case shows he is terrified and desperate to do anything he can to distract attention from himself. His abuse of power reads as consciousness of guilt.

The writers of the Constitition never intended for a criminal tyrant to be president.

Trump has already been impeached twice. He's already a convicted felon and known rapist. With the denialist power of Trump's cult of personality, I think they could find that Trump was right there with Epstein, doing everything he did, and it wouldn't make a difference to his followers... (1/2)

He attacks science and higher ed, driving top talent to flee, then complains we don't have talent and must bring in immigrants with h1b visas that he's charging $100,000 a pop for. He's ok with immigration so long as he can exploit and profit from it.

If Trump and his buddies were innocent, they would have published the Epstein files for the world to see so Trump could attack Dems over a hoax nothing-burger. They did the opposite, and that tells you there's something they're hiding, and it's huge.

If Trump thinks he can bribe his way out of the Epstein cover-up, he is mistaken.

Trump wanting to send Americans checks for $2,000 sounds a lot like Epstein hush money, akin to what he paid Stormy Daniels, except here the money would ultimately come out of our own pockets.

🎯🎯

I sometimes see Dems/progressives on here engaging in homophobic personal attacks on Trump and Vance, and I gotta tell you that's offensive, wrong, and only helps them and other bigots.

If Trump and his buddies were innocent, they would have published the Epstein files for the world to see so Trump could attack Dems over a hoax nothing-burger. They did the opposite, and that tells you there's something they're hiding, and it's huge.

The Trump-Epstein cover-up shows that predators of a feather flock together. I wouldn't be surprised by anything implicating Trump. My question is who else are they covering for?

Trump companies destroyed documents against court orders. Trump flushed documents at the White House. Trump is a criminal who thinks he is above the law. Even if they release the Epstein files, it's likely the most damning evidence will have been destroyed.

Millionaires, billionaires, and soon to be the first trillionaire... All are made by hoarding and exploitation and would not exist otherwise. They create the need for foodstamps, housing assistance, and more, and we (willingly and unwillingly) enable them by participating in the system.

Poverty and hunger are the result of capitalism working exactly as it was designed to work. Stigma should not be directed at those who need SNAP, but at those who hoard money and resources to create the need for SNAP in the first place.

Trump is monetizing immigration for personal gain.

He attacks science and higher ed, driving top talent to flee, then complains we don't have talent and must bring in immigrants with h1b visas that he's charging $100,000 a pop for. He's ok with immigration so long as he can exploit and profit from it.

Call me crazy, but maybe a good reason to stop attacking science and higher ed, which is leading to top U.S. talent fleeing the country and being rendered unemployed?

Wow, a Long Island jury awarded $112 Million to 674 immigrants who were unlawfully held by county police so they could be handed over to ICE

Trump has already been impeached twice. He's already a convicted felon and known rapist. With the denialist power of Trump's cult of personality, I think they could find that Trump was right there with Epstein, doing everything he did, and it wouldn't make a difference to his followers... (1/2)

As a sociologist who has taught thousands of students, I would never recommend students getting data from Doordash, much less basing policy decisions on it. Trump and his people know the best data is from peer-reviewed sources. People who know what they're doing use peer-reviewed research.

As an actual social scientist, I have a lot of concerns about the highest office in the land relying not on data from peer-reviewed research, as is the norm across the world, but DoorDash, of all places. I mean, what, was McDonalds too much?

Innocent people wouldn't do everything in their power to hide the Epstein files.

A convicted felon should not be able to seat judges who may then overturn his own convictions and judgements against him and empower him to commit more crimes.

If this were 1940s Germany, ICE raids would be known officially as an arm of the SS and Gestapo.

If what ICE is doing is about national security, why do research studies consistently show that immigrants (including those undicumented) commit fewer crimes than U.S.-born citizens?

A convicted felon should not be able to pardon fellow criminals who committed crimes on his behalf.

Starving people is a weapon of control. So, too, is controlling and attacking the media, attacking science and higher ed, and using the military against citizens and innocent people. All weapons of control.

Never in the history of humanity did starving people make anyone great.

We need laws and Constitutional amendments to prevent future Trumps from happening. Of course, laws are nothing without people to uphold them.

Letting people starve only to cave on what was being fought for has the same effect as deliberately making people starve for nothing.

I received this email about Democrats caving to end the shutdown from one of the SNAP recipients I spoke to:

The writers of the Constitition never intended for a criminal tyrant to be president.

A justice and legal system that fails to prosecute a treasonous criminal for his crimes, allows him to seat judges who empower him to commit more crimes, and allows him to pardon fellow criminals who committed crimes for him isn't a just system. It's a crime ring.

A convicted felon should not be able to pardon fellow criminals who committed crimes on his behalf.