As I say in the piece below, this is the wrong question. While it's certainly politically popular to talk about protecting children, it misses what we actually need: a comprehensive consumer privacy bill that restricts data collection for all users and bans behavioral advertising.

Just finished watching the space shuttle launch, and I found myself feeling surprisingly emotional. Happy Space Day!

oh hey I know her

Always fun when EFF gets the last word (even if I sound a bit like a pretentious philosophy major - I promise that I did not major in philosophy): www.spglobal.com/market-intel...

We sometimes joke that Congress/ the companies do weird or shady stuff to see if we are awake and paying attention. Turns out, we are.

I am calling on @icegov.bsky.social Director Todd Lyons to immediately confirm or deny the existence of a “domestic terrorist” database. If true, you’re violating the Constitution. If not, maybe talk to your “border czar” to get your stories straight. This isn’t a game–it’s the Constitution.

This is a fairly odd PR stop: thehill.com/blogs/in-the...

LISTEN: Those “year-in-review” insights from your apps might seem fun to see and share, but they’re a symptom of the surveillance culture that permeates the internet and threatens your privacy, EFF’s @irmck.bsky.social told @KCBSRadio.bsky.social. www.audacy.com/podcast/kcb...

It's Giving Tuesday, and thus, I ask for your support. EFF is actually grassroots funded, which is awesome, because that means I get to lobby on behalf of internet users, not internet companies. It's one of the reasons this job is the best. But we do still need money to do stuff, like go to DC.

Just wanted to say this a little louder before I go to bed tonight - there's a lot EFF can do to represent internet users, but when people take the time to also speak for themselves, our message hits a little differently. Keep sending those emails!

Periodic reminder - if Congress is about to vote on a bill, and you have an opinion about that bill, you should tell your elected peeps directly. Most of us have 3 (sorry, DC), and they don’t coordinate, so you have to tell all 3 yourself. Call this, and ask to be connected: 202-224-3121

Shameless self promotion: Right now in a minute, I’m speaking on Section 230’s misunderstood legacy at #FutureOfSpeech 2025, hosted by @cdt.org & @StandTogether. I'm newly back from sabbatical, so I'm rested and extra feisty. Join us! 🎟️ standtogether.swoogo.com/foso25/9611460

Caveat: I’m on sabbatical for a bit, so I’m not in the weeds at all on the current political situation. However, when one party has unified control of DC, it is absolutely bonkers to blame a shutdown on the minority.

wow it's too bad no one at the ftc ever has done work around algorithmic discrimination in pricing. if only a person (or two??) there had been ready for this future

Just going to leave this here. Just in case. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...

Don't spend your money to voluntarily put surveillance devices in your own home.

the future is flying cars that are snitches

Congress is bringing back the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA). It doesn’t protect kids—it gives government officials power to pressure platforms to take down lawful speech.

The deadline is almost here to vote for EFF’s “How to Fix the Internet” podcast in The Webby Awards. Cast your vote today!

Unnecessary hills I will absolutely die on - sticking "gate" on the end of something does not mean "scandal related to the thing." Watergate was the name of the hotel where President Nixon did illegal things. It was not a scandal related to water in any way.

Signal's a great app to keep your communications secure, but make sure you know the identities of the users in your group chats. Our SSD guide on how to use Signal includes guidance on managing your group chat preferences.

This skeet exists because of Section 230. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...

The gall of DOJ to complain that it's short-staffed

Getting a little tired of having to explain why The Bad People get to have constitutional and human rights, including speech rights.

This is a great piece that does a great job looking at what the Take It Down Act would do in the current climate. TL; dr - now, more than ever, it's important to know what the bill CAN do, not what the sponsors say it SHOULD do: www.theverge.com/policy/62497...

You know what would Be Best? Not passing a censorship bill: www.washingtonpost.com/politics/202...

Cowards, every single one of them

You may have always cared about surveillance, maybe you care more today than you did yesterday... Either way, you should check out and save this Surveillance Self-Defense Guide from our trusted friends at the @eff.org ssd.eff.org

For over a decade EFF has argued that warrantless backdoor searches of 702 data are unconstitutional—now a federal court agrees with us. Keep up the momentum for your digital rights! 👩‍⚖️ Contact your representatives: act.eff.org 👫 Connect with local groups: efa.eff.org ❤️ Join EFF: eff.org/702victory

It took us 6+ months to put together this "short" summary of EFF's work, and I couldn't be more proud to lobby for these ideas. Time to (skirt) suit up!

This Salt Typhoon stuff is insane. The entire FISA surveillance infrastructure has been completely owned by China and literally no part of our telecom infrastructure is safe to use without end-to-end encryption.

Louder for the folks in the back - stop pushing for censorship!

Now seems like a good time to remind people that Senators Klobuchar & Lujan proposed a law to make "health misinfo" illegal. And it would be misinfo as determined by *the head of HHS*. And now RFK Jr. is going to lead that agency. Stop pushing for censorship www.techdirt.com/2024/11/20/d...

“Cruz is a conservative...but there's been a lot of conservatives who are still very interested in privacy,” EFF’s @irmck.bsky.social told National Journal. Could he solve the private right of action & state preemption fights that doomed earlier data-privacy bills?

Co-CEOs? I know how we could instantly make this new bloated government department at least 50% more efficient. www.cnn.com/2024/11/12/p...

Good morning and happy November. It is now time to not set our kitchens on fire.

Use this easy-to-use tool to tell Congress: They Must Defeat HPSCI’s Horrific Surveillance Bill. act.eff.org/action/tell-...

By the government’s own numbers, Section 702 violations are still occurring at a rate of more than 4,000 per year. H.R.6611, the FISA Reform and Reauthorization Act of 2023 ignores this issue, and Members should vote NO. www.eff.org/deeplinks/20...

Our goal is always to limit the amount of unwarranted and harmful surveillance imposed on people. To that end, this choice is clear - all Members should vote NO on the Intelligence Committee’s bill, H.R.6611, the FISA Reform and Reauthorization Act of 2023.

If you're a former Hill Staffer in the Bay Area (or who WANTS to be in the Bay Area), come work with me! www.paycomonline.net/v4/ats/web.p...

This is 100% right. Very occasionally, I would get a “verbal” tip, where someone just verbally told me how fabulous I was, while still leaving whatever they were planning to leave. That’s just kind of insulting, actually.

10/10, would watch

Been in DC for 12 hours, already been ghost bussed. Feels good to be home.

Funding the government shouldn’t be dependent on also renewing dangerous, controversial, and invasive mass surveillance programs. Section 702 must be reformed or retired--but don't put it into a bill that prevents a shutdown.

You don’t have to be old enough to vote in order to protect your digital rights. EFF wants young people to step up and defend themselves against an onslaught of government censorship and surveillance.

You don’t have to be old enough to vote in order to protect your digital rights. EFF wants young people to step up and defend themselves against an onslaught of government censorship and surveillance.

i am just saying lorem ipsum if marsha blackburn is an enthusiastic supporter of your bill u had better take another look at your bill

We've updated Privacy Badger to put a stop to more of Google's link tracking tricks.

And this is the fundamental problem with all the federal bills that have a "duty of care" for content served to minors.