Don’t repost this video of Justin Fox admitting he is a fucking dumbass. We don’t want to injure the reputation of Justin Fox the wasteful snowflake.

Don’t repost this and talk about how Nathan Cavanuagh is, by his own admission, an uneducated, uninformed dumbass who caused untold harm while serving no real purpose. We don’t want to harm the reputation of Nathan Cavanuagh.

All the knowledge of the world in people’s pocket but no one will read the fucking article. No wonder we are doomed.

I don’t give a flying fuck what you think about sex workers - unless the IP you create is created as part of your job and is what you are getting paid to do, your employer should not own your IP.

Age verification? I marched in my local Bicentennial parade.

It is unfortunate that we need this information

Person who wants to ban Fox News: The Constitution doesn’t mention cable TV! Me: You’re right. It also doesn’t mention telephones or the internet. Do you think that means the government gets to regulate what you post on social media or punish what you say on the phone?

I wrote this song on Saturday, recorded it yesterday and released it to you today in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis. It’s dedicated to the people of Minneapolis, our innocent immigrant neighbors and in memory of Alex Pretti and Renee Good. Stay free

Wild!

By burn_if_found on Instagram

The number of people who think FOX Broadcast and Fox News are the same thing and carry the same content is much higher than it should be.

There is no lack of access to diverse viewpoints in today’s world. Indeed, it is easier and faster to access them now. And if you want to know what the FCC does, Google is your friend.

Since you limited replies, let’s do it this way. The Fairness Doctrine did not impose an obligation on the consumer to tune in at whatever random time a station decided to air the diverse viewpoints - it merely required they be available. Diverse viewpoints are more readily available now.

Mayor Steven Meiner of Miami Beach decided to Streisand a negative comment made about him by violating the First Amendment rights of the commentator. What a fuckhead he is.

Any “meal” can be a “$3 meal” if you are willing to cut back the portions enough. The question isn’t “can you do it?” - it is “can you survive if you do it?” And the answer is “not really”.

Trump sucks. Noem sucks. ICE sucks. But the dead cannot be defamed and the U.S. government (or its officials) cannot be sued for defamation.

Ouch

And people say the courts are useless…

Help if you can, quote post the original if you cannot help financially.

Trump and his sycophants are pure evil.

Section 230 does not “allow” propaganda - the First Amendment does that. Getting rid of §230 will mean more crap, not less, as sites will no longer be able to ban or block without getting sued.

Why in the fuck are people lying about Fox News and making me defend them? You cannot combat misinformation by spreading misinformation.

What is up with people wanting other people to waste time and money filing frivolous lawsuits? No, filing a lawsuit that gets dismissed before the ink is even dry does not teach the person you are suing a lesson; it does not lead to discovery; it does not make them look bad.

What the actual - and I cannot stress this enough - fuck? www.nbcnews.com/news/educati...

I know it is tight for a lot of people right now, but this is amazing if you can help out.

Person: The Fairness Doctrine prevented echo chambers! Me: No, people have always gotten to choose what information to pay attention to and interact with. Person: *blocks me thereby creating their own echo chamber* Way to prove my point, dude.

She hired Larry Klayman! @enriquebedlam.bsky.social

This is an incredible cause if you can contribute.

Because people apparently don’t know how social media works and are incapable of following threads to their starting points: No, I don’t think Tylenol causes autism. No, Tylenol cannot sue Trump & RFK, Jr. for defamation. No, Tylenol should not file a counter suit in TX.

Yep. “Working” is a key word in the phrase “the working poor”. If a business could not afford its power bill, or its inventory, or any other non-human element, no one would be excusing that. Why is it okay that businesses don’t have to pay the actual cost of labor?

“Crime free” laws suck.

Be prepared for tomorrow.

What the fuck is wrong with people? There should be no hungry children at school because they are children and we are supposed to be civilized. We feed inmates because they are inmates. Starving them would not be an excuse to starve children. (And again, we are supposed to be civilized.)

Welp - maybe he should have actually showed up to court instead of thumbing his nose at the judge. apnews.com/article/supr...

Good advice for this weekend - and any other day. 😉

Know your rights

Re-upping

Re-upping

Re-upping

Re-upping

Re-upping some info before this weekend

The number of people who think we need to bring shit like this back is astoundingly high - and most of them would fail it. (Full disclosure: I am a highly educated/knowledgeable individual and I failed more than 1 question.)

Yep

No. Fox News hiring an actor to pretend to be an ex-whatever is not fraud. While fraud does require a false statement of fact, it also requires a reliance on that statement and a harm *to the person relying on the statement* caused by that reliance. And no, believing lies is not a qualifying harm.

I will never not repost this (Sound on for maximum effect)

Once again reminding people they are on the internet - their favorite search engine is *right there*. Maybe verify things before sharing them?

Lawsuits are expensive - donate if you can.

Wrote a little something about that asshole and his fans. Think you’ll like it. No paywall yet. Quote or screenshot parts you like and share. Thanks!

Worth the read.

Important info: