I know it is tight for a lot of people right now, but this is amazing if you can help out.

Person: The Fairness Doctrine prevented echo chambers! Me: No, people have always gotten to choose what information to pay attention to and interact with. Person: *blocks me thereby creating their own echo chamber* Way to prove my point, dude.

She hired Larry Klayman! @enriquebedlam.bsky.social

This is an incredible cause if you can contribute.

Because people apparently don’t know how social media works and are incapable of following threads to their starting points: No, I don’t think Tylenol causes autism. No, Tylenol cannot sue Trump & RFK, Jr. for defamation. No, Tylenol should not file a counter suit in TX.

Yep. “Working” is a key word in the phrase “the working poor”. If a business could not afford its power bill, or its inventory, or any other non-human element, no one would be excusing that. Why is it okay that businesses don’t have to pay the actual cost of labor?

“Crime free” laws suck.

Be prepared for tomorrow.

What the fuck is wrong with people? There should be no hungry children at school because they are children and we are supposed to be civilized. We feed inmates because they are inmates. Starving them would not be an excuse to starve children. (And again, we are supposed to be civilized.)

Welp - maybe he should have actually showed up to court instead of thumbing his nose at the judge. apnews.com/article/supr...

Good advice for this weekend - and any other day. 😉

Know your rights

Re-upping

Re-upping

Re-upping

Re-upping

Re-upping some info before this weekend

The number of people who think we need to bring shit like this back is astoundingly high - and most of them would fail it. (Full disclosure: I am a highly educated/knowledgeable individual and I failed more than 1 question.)

Yep

No. Fox News hiring an actor to pretend to be an ex-whatever is not fraud. While fraud does require a false statement of fact, it also requires a reliance on that statement and a harm *to the person relying on the statement* caused by that reliance. And no, believing lies is not a qualifying harm.

I will never not repost this (Sound on for maximum effect)

Once again reminding people they are on the internet - their favorite search engine is *right there*. Maybe verify things before sharing them?

Lawsuits are expensive - donate if you can.

Wrote a little something about that asshole and his fans. Think you’ll like it. No paywall yet. Quote or screenshot parts you like and share. Thanks!

Worth the read.

Important info:

Using the “r” word will get you insta-blocked - I don’t care what your point is.

We need your help. Urgently. Please consider if you can. Or even a signal boost of the thread attached. Thank you.

We need to talk about something very important. There is a myth spreading in both irl and online left and progressive spaces that is doing real, material, lasting harm. THREAD.

Person A: The media need to stop acting like there are 2 sides to every issue. Person B: That’s why we need the Fairness Doctrine back! Huh?

Anyone know anything about bees?

Good thread:

There’s something sad about people who claim to be “educators” or “historians” or “experts” who refuse to acknowledge when they get something wrong. No one expects anyone to know everything - there is no shame in asking questions and learning something new.

Important information:

This thread…

The current SCOTUS has shown little to no respect for the rule of law or the Constitution. And we have dumbfucks on here who think we need to give them the opportunity to strip freedom of speech and the press.

Important information:

Person: The press should have to tell the truth! Me: That would violate the First Amendment. Person: [Blocks me.] Me: [Not at all surprised] So much for wanting truth…

Be safe out there!

Know your rights:

More important information:

Important information:

You’ve been kidnapped. The characters from the last TV show you watched are trying to rescue you. Who is coming to save you?

Know your rights

As we enter protest season, remember:: Hydrate Memorize the phone number of an attorney or a non-protester who can call an attorney for you Make sure you wear proper clothing and protective gear that covers your eyes, ears, and mouth Sunscreen exposed skin Don’t take your phone If you must take

He got tired of being proven wrong so limited who can reply. 😂 No, the FCC codes not and cannot regulate cable channels. No, cable channels did not self-with the FCC standards. The Hays Code was a private standard.

make an observation about your pantry that also sounds like the title of a novel: I Can’t Find It!: A Hidden In Plain Sight Novel

It could not have applied to cable without violating the First Amendment.