Rep. Andy Ogles is spot on. In Nashville, private property has already been abolished, and O'Connell and the Metro Council have seized the means of production.

How did your favorite AI chatbot rank when it comes to its “free speech culture”? To find out how we evaluated and ranked each chatbot, read the full report here: futurefreespeech.org/that-violate...

🚨 NEW REPORT 🤖 We asked 8 major AI chatbots to generate content about lawful, but controversial issues. We then scored and ranked each chatbot, factoring in company policies, model behavior, transparency, and openness to debate.

Some pundits are willfully ignoring the role the FCC played in this and are acting as if what happened to Kimmel is just a normal business decision, where an entertainer faces consequences from their employer for saying something beyond the pale on TV. www.thejustncase.net/p/jimmy-kimm...

I’m sure everyone wishes they had a house that was purchased in 1980 for $11k and passed down to a next generation. www.newschannel5.com/news/rezonin...

Hello from Pride in NYC❤️If you have a minute pls read why 1A is so important!!

Are EU digital laws being used to justify censorship in Latin America? A new guest post from @celeup.bsky.social’s Juan Martin Marinangeli and Matias Gonzalez Mama dives into Latin America’s race to implement European-style digital regulations — often without vital safeguards.

The U.S. continues to weaponize free speech in its immigration crackdown — but we’re keeping close watch🕵️‍♀️. Meanwhile, disinformation and hate speech laws are rapidly evolving across the Atlantic.

A new Tennessee law — the Protecting Everyone Against Crime and Extremism Act (PEACE Act) — appears mundane but raise serious First Amendment concerns, writes @ashkhen.bsky.social with The Future of Free Speech, a nonpartisan think tank at Vanderbilt University. @futurefreespeech.org.

Cato has published my comprehensive review of the ~240 Venezuelans the US government renditioned 2 months ago to Salvador’s notorious prison. We identified FIFTY who came legally, never violated any immigration law, but are imprisoned at the US government’s request and at US taxpayer expense.

We should all be worried about the rise of extremist and anti-democratic movements in liberal democracies. But it would be even more dangerous if we adopted illiberal means to address them. I enjoyed contributing to this thought-provoking essay with @nataliealkiviadou.bsky.social

"Democracies cannot be defended by imitating the tactics of their enemies. They must show confidence in their values, be that openness, pluralism, and the power of persuasion over prohibition." @nataliealkiviadou.bsky.social & @thejustncase.net www.bedrockprinciple.com/p/germany-ba...

Would a ban on Germany's AfD Party strengthen its democracy — or jeopardize it? Using history and human rights law, @nataliealkiviadou.bsky.social and @thejustncase.net explain how this approach can backfire.

Can social media be transformed from a divisive echo chamber into a vibrant marketplace of ideas? Imagine a platform where free speech isn’t stifled by top‐down speech restrictions but is empowered by community-driven context.

In this essay, Hirad Marami and I explore how open societies thrive when they embrace bold and challenging ideas, even from outsiders — including foreigners unafraid to dissent or criticize the government. www.bedrockprinciple.com/p/the-deport...

I never thought that, as an immigrant to the U.S., I would have to worry about how what I say might affect my legal status. Despite the crucial role that foreigners have played in expanding free speech and sparking progress throughout U.S. history, we are now at a crossroads.

Free speech in the AI age is going to be messy. But if we care about open societies, we can’t ignore how foundational these systems are becoming—and how they decide what can, and cannot, be said. Read our full updated analysis here: www.bedrockprinciple.com/p/one-year-l...

One year ago, we asked a provocative question: Are AI chatbots censoring too much? We recently updated our analysis and added some newer models. Bottom line: There’s good news and concerning news. 🧵

Read what we found here: www.bedrockprinciple.com/p/one-year-l...

A year ago, a @futurefreespeech.org report showed that many popular AI chatbots refused to generate content about controversial topics. At The Bedrock Principle, my colleagues @jordicalbad.bsky.social, Isabelle Anzabi, and I check in to see if and how things have changed. (Link in the replies)

President Trump’s effort to redefine which speech is “acceptable” highlights a deeper threat: waning public support for free expression. @economist.com cites our forthcoming report on global free speech attitudes with a warning from @mchangama.bsky.social:

🌎 Our NEW survey of 33 countries shows that for every country gaining ground, two are sliding backward since 2021. Let’s dig into how public attitudes toward free expression are changing across the globe (including a backslide in the U.S.!) 🧵:

📉 The U.S. dropped from 3rd to 9th in our latest survey of global attitudes on #freespeech in 33 countries. @mchangama.bsky.social spoke to Lindsey Reiser at @cbsnews.com about our findings:

🚨We just released our survey on global attitudes toward free speech in over 30 countries. Here’s a sneak peek at some of the results 🧵⬇️⬇️⬇️

Read it all here: www.persuasion.community/p/free-speec...

"The Trump administration has once again shown its lack of guiding principles by criticizing European leaders for limiting free speech while arguing for fewer protections against deportation than are currently afforded to people in much of Europe." - @mchangama.bsky.social at Persuasion

Thread on threats to free speech both in Europe and on this side of the Atlantic.

To read further about the Weimar Fallacy and other lessons from free speech history, you can pre-order the paperback version of @mchangama.bsky.social's book here: www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/jacob...

At The Bedrock Principle, @mchangama.bsky.social explains why this claim is another example of the Weimar Fallacy: www.bedrockprinciple.com/p/face-the-n...

J.D. Vance recently warned about threats to free speech in Europe. @facethenation.bsky.social host Margaret Brennan responded with the claim that "free speech was weaponized to conduct a genocide" in Germany. But did free speech lead to the rise of the Nazis?

Read our perspectives on counterspeech and online hate speech (via @mchangama.bsky.social and @nataliealkiviadou.bsky.social ) in this article from @benjaminvonwyl.bsky.social www.swissinfo.ch/ger/demokrat...

"If the EU wants 'what is illegal offline to be illegal online,' this will be to the detriment of queer people in Hungary — where there is an anti-LGBT law — or those critical of religion in Spain — where blasphemy is a criminal offense."

A prior restraint AND compelled speech. Neat. I guess we're taking First Amendment violations up to 11.

"Instead of upholding the First Amendment, the Trump administration risks turning it into a weapon—one that punishes dissent and protects only those who toe the line."

Read my full analysis at The Bedrock Principle: www.bedrockprinciple.com/p/trumps-fre...

While the Trump administration has taken some steps to limit government interference in online speech, its other actions thus far have raised serious concerns and questions about his commitment to "bring back free speech to America."

Look for it 📅 March 18! Pre-order the book here or wherever books are sold: www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/jacob...

When my book came out 3 years ago, I argued that we were entering a free speech recession. In a brand new epilogue for the soon-to-be-published paperback version, I explore how global conflicts and elite panic have led democracies and authoritarian states alike to double down.

A Code of Conduct for Countering "Illegal Hate Speech" has been integrated into the EU's Digital Services Act. Will Europe's attempt to deal with illegal content online undermine free expression? @nataliealkiviadou.bsky.social raises some key concerns:

Check out our new global #freespeech news roundup, designed to keep you updated about all the latest threats to (and opportunities for) free speech in the digital age!

The party of free speech™

The Supreme Court's TikTok opinion sets a dangerous precedent for free speech. @jkosseff.bsky.social explains why at our new publication: The Bedrock Principle. thebedrockprinciple.substack.com/p/tiktok-opi...

Quick update: I have launched a new publication on Substack to host commentary from me and my colleagues at @futurefreespeech.org. My first post digs deeper into some issues I raised recently in a thread on Meta’s content moderation policy changes.

🚨BREAKING🚨: The Supreme Court has UPHELD the TikTok ban. Here is our statement:

Meta's messaging surrounding its content moderation changes might be designed to appease the Right. But, for years, progressives and minority groups who are protesting Meta’s pivot have - rightly - raised concerns about over-moderation on Meta’s platforms. Let’s take a look 🧵

10 years after the tragic Charlie Hebdo attack, has free speech in France gotten better or worse? @mchangama.bsky.social joined @france24.com to discuss the ongoing fight to protect free speech in France and around the world. Watch the full interview here: www.france24.com/en/tv-shows/...

A TikTok ban could set a dangerous precedent for free speech in the U.S, write @mchangama.bsky.social and @jkosseff.bsky.social at the @wsj.com: www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

Here's one of our key arguments from the brief:

ICYMI: We joined @thefireorg.bsky.social and friends in an amicus brief urging SCOTUS to overturn the law banning TikTok. Our Executive Director @mchangama.bsky.social explains why 🧵: