1/3 New recommendation: Eythan Levy (2026). Detecting temporal relations in archaeology: model and algorithms. V2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

Welcome the UISPP Journal as a new PCI-Friendly journal! They'll accept submissions after our recommendation, and will tell you quickly if they'll simply publish it as is, or give it a quick evaluation. The current list of PCI-Friendly journals is here: archaeo.peercommunityin.org/about/pci_fr... 🦣🏺

1/4 New recommendation: Strohm et al. (2026). Bridging Interdisciplinary Research Data Management and Data Science through Modular Research Processes. V2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: Thibaud Poigt, Kevin Parachaud (2026). Exploring Celtic Weighing Metrology through archaeological and written sources. V2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology hal.science/hal-05552237v2 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: A. M. H. Eriksen, O. Müller, H. H. Lading, D. Gregory (2026). Evaluating commercial DNA extraction kits for bacterial community profiling in waterlogged archaeological wood. V3 evaluated and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: M. Bellat, A. Hatton, J. D. Orellana Figueroa (2026). Comparative review of recent developments in archaeological predictive models and automatic structure detection. V3 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: Angelos Tsilogiannis, Markos Konstantakis, Spyros Vosinakis (2026). Experimental interpretation of ancient games through playtesting. V4 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

Do you want to know everything about @peercommunityin.bsky.social and the diamond OA @peercomjournal.bsky.social ? Here is THE paper you need to read! 📖 doi.org/10.1629/uksg...

1/3 New recommendation: A. Disser, S. Bauvais, T. Huet, L. Costa, M. Leoni, T. Birch, P. Dillmann (2026). The CHIPS Database: A Repository for Reference Data on Chemical Analysis in Archaeometallurgy of Iron. V4 recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

Struggling with PCI’s process? We broke it down into 4 simple steps. Time to share your archaeological discoveries for free evaluation and publication!😀 🧪🏺🦣

1/3 New recommendation: Ooha L. Reddy (2026). Quantifying Structural Similarity between Indus and Tibetan–Yi Scripts Using Hybrid Vision Embeddings. V5 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

Do not forget that you can have your research evaluated transparently and for free with our platform and our community of more than 200 researchers, before publishing it also for free in a diamond open access journal @peercomjournal.bsky.social Hope we can handle your next paper!🏺🧪🦣

1/3 New recommendation: Simon Bickler & Benjamin Davies (2026). Virtual Vaka: A Computational Tool for Thinking About Seafaring. V4 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: Despoina Tsiafaki, Natasa Michailidou, Melpomeni Karta, Vasiliki Syrakouli (2026). Pioneering Preventive Preservation: The role of remote sensing in Cultural Heritage. V2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: Haley Anne Schwartz & Tania González Cantera (2026). Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Reliable Access Method for ChatGPT 4o in Archaeological Heritage Prompting). V3 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: Peppa, Moullou, Egglezos (2026). Resilience of the Roman Balneum in the face of Climate Change at Brexiza, Greece: Unravelling Pathology, Advancing Risk Assessment Methodologies and Adapting Preservation Strategies. V3 recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

1/3 New recommendation: Chatzisavvas, Pappas, Rigas, Mitianoudis, Pavlidis, Kiourt, Koutsoudis, Katsouros & Ioannakis (2026). Towards an Easy-to-Use Machine Learning Framework for Cultural Heritage Scientists. V3 peer-reviewed & recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... #OpenScience

1/3 New recommendation: Thomas Andre, Christophe Tufféry, Vincent Delvigne (2026). Siligîtes: a QGIS extension to investigate mobility networks in archaeology. V3 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: S. Gampe, K. Tolle, C. von Nicolai, M. Möller (2026). Supporting a Celtic coin die study with image matching and hierarchical clustering for creating a social networks analysis. v3 reviewed & recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

All the chapters have been reviewed and recommended for free! You have access to the review process on our website, and to the previous versions as preprints. Soon, you'll have the texts with nice editing by @sidestone.bsky.social ! That's great ! @felixthehauskat.bsky.social @shumon.bsky.social 🏺

Dear archaeologists, would you mind answering this very short survey so that we know better how to improve again our platform and process in the future?

Please let us know your thoughts on PCI and Peer Community Journal (PCJ) by taking this five-minute survey! form.typeform.com/to/CO4KpWgi

The proceedings of @caaint.bsky.social in 2023 are finally out! Proud of our nice book that brings together many different themes. All papers are recommended through @pciarchaeology.bsky.social

1/3 New recommendation: @alainqueffelec.bsky.social (2026). Replication report for Marwick (2025) “Is archaeology a science?”, including new data from OpenAlex. V5 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: E. Tzannidakis, D. Egglezos, D. Moullou (2026). Vulnerability of Monumental Structures to Climate Change The Cases of “Building K” in Epidaurus and the Roman Balneum in Rafina. v4 reviewed & recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: Nikos Tsironis and Angeliki Chrysanthi (2026). Nekyia: Descent into Hades – A case study on playing with the Past through Serious Games. V2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: Asja Müller and Martin Kim (2026). Press Play to Enter: Serious Gaming and the Body at the Asklepieion of Kos. v2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣

1/3 New recommendation: Tronchère-Cottet,Pothier, Dessaint, Obrecht (2026) The “fish-bone galleries” of Lyon, France: combining archaeological and geological 3D modelling to understand a mysterious ancient underground structure. v4 recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪

1/3 New recommendation: Kyriakos Sgouropoulos, Periklis Chrysafakoglou, Ilias Ladenis (2026). Crossing software boundaries: From iDig and ODK to QField for archaeological field documentation. v2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 #OpenScience #openaccess

1/3 New recommendation: Melina K. Grigoriadi, Georgios Papaioannou (2026). Spatiotemporal reconstruction of pot burial excavations. V3 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣

1/3 New recommendation: David Roqui, Adèle Cormier, Nistor Grozavu, Ann Bourges (2026). A Multimodal Approach to Heritage Preservation in the Context of Climate Change. V4 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣 @fdsciencpatrimoine.bsky.social

1/3 New recommendation: Amélie Demoulin, Carine Perrin, Odile Guillon, Valérie Gontero-Lauze, Jean Rouquerol, Florence Boulc’h (2026). Reconstructing a medieval recipe for red lead (Pb₃O₄): an archaeometric approach). V3 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣

1/3 New recommendation: Bordignon, Collina, Fabbri, Fanini, Ferdani, Rega, Sullini (2026). Balancing Visual Credibility and Transparency: A FAIR Approach to 3D Digitisation for Cultural Heritage documentation and dissemination. V2 recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣

1/3 New recommendation: Karsten Tolle, Sebastian Gampe, Florian Thiery (2026). Fuzziness and Wobbliness in Numismatics and Ceramology: Examples from the NFDI4Objects Knowledge Graph. V2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪🦣

1/4 New recommendation: Courtenay et al. (2026). Computational simulations of potential Pachycrocuta bite damage based on a ~1.2 Ma ravaged hippopotamus femur from Fuente Nueva 3 (Orce, Granada, Spain). V2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI #Archaeology doi.org/10.1101/2024... 🏺🧪🦣

1/4 New recommendation: Robert J. Bischoff & Cecilia Padilla-Iglesias (2026). Bridging Material Culture Networks and Social Networks in Archaeology. V2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI Archaeology doi.org/10.31235/osf... @ceciliapad.bsky.social

1/3 New recommendation: Fusco, Habte, Leplongeon, Ménard, Manica, Spinapolice, Leonardi (2025). The environmental context of the Middle-to-Late Stone Age Transition in eastern Africa: seasonality as a key factor. v2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI Archaeology doi.org/10.1101/2024...

📢 Calling all archaeologists! 📢 🧪🏺 Got a paper ready for submission? Tired of waiting 6, 12, or even 18 months for colleagues to read your work? Frustrated by costly publication fees? Go preprint, then use our free and transparent evaluation process, and accelerate your research impact. 🚀

We are thrilled to announce Paolo Crosetto's presentation titled "The Drain of Scientific Publishing: Why Publishing Has Become a Challenge for Science and How It Can Be Improved" in our upcoming PCI Webinar on March 19th at 4 PM (GMT+1)!! 🤩 To learn more and sign up, please visit buff.ly/bxYWPCz

Early sneak peek of an upcoming #Sidestone book on archaeological #types and #typologies I am co-editing with @felixthehauskat.bsky.social and Sébastien Plutniak. All chapters underwent open peer-review at @pciarchaeology.bsky.social - stay tuned. 🧪🏺

1/3 New recommendation: Shumon T. Hussain (2025). The Loss of Typological Innocence: Pluralism in the Epistemology and Ontology of Archaeological Typo-Praxis. v3 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... @shumon.bsky.social 🧪🏺

Could be your chance to try our free and transparent system for peer review since the proceedings of this excellent congress will go through @pciarchaeology.bsky.social once again! Check out our website for previous years recommendations!

Oups forgot (again) to add the specific emotes... 🏺🧪

1/3 New recommendation: Nikolai Paukkonen @npkk.bsky.social (2025). What You Don’t See is What You Don’t Get. Problems of Effortless Photorealism in Archaeological Field Documentation. V2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... @helsinki.fi

1/3 New recommendation: Stefanos Costopoulos, Georgios Papaioannou (2025). The impact of normal mapping on the appearance of geometrically simplified archaeological 3D models. V3 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🧪🏺

Hey archaeologists! You want to publish your research in a totally free and transparent way, sharing data, code, and even having a recommendation of your work at the end of the process. Stop paying thousands of $ to for profit companies! Try us instead, you're not alone! 🆓🏺🧪

The PCI-PCJ 2025 recap is here! ✨ Dive into the events of 2025 👀: peercommunityin.org/2026/01/07/p... Huge thanks to everyone who contributed to an amazing year! 🙏 #PCI2025 #Highlights

1/3 New recommendation: Piraye Hacıgüzeller (2025). Speaking Types into Being: Language Acts, Typological Persistence and Performing Archaeological Space. v2 peer-reviewed and recommended by PCI Archaeology doi.org/10.5281/zeno... 🏺🧪

Not an easy task for sure to study the real impact of #openscience but difficult to find cons except for the insane APCs. So let's make free open science with @peercommunityin.bsky.social and @peercomjournal.bsky.social OPEN SCIENCE IS JUST GOOD SCIENCE www.science.org/content/arti...

@antiquity.ac.uk's editorial about peer review pros and issues, their internal process and options to improve peer-review in general, including @pciarchaeology.bsky.social ! We indeed correct most of the issues listed in the editorial with our free and transparent system doi.org/10.15184/aqy...