Ebru Evcen
@ebruevcen.bsky.social
📤 82
📥 86
📝 4
phd candidate in linguistics
@ucsandiego.bsky.social
| interested in language and meaning
Now out in Open Mind!
@drbarner.bsky.social
and I find that when people hear a conditional statement like “If you mow the lawn, you’ll get $5,” they often interpret it as “only if you mow the lawn”, a pragmatic, perfected meaning.
doi.org/10.1162/opmi...
loading . . .
Already Perfect: Language Users Access the Pragmatic Meanings of Conditionals First
Abstract. Conditional statements often have two interpretations. For instance, the statement, “If you mow the lawn, you will receive $5”, might be understood to mean that mowing the lawn is just one p...
https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi.a.17
14 days ago
1
9
4
reposted by
Ebru Evcen
David Barner
over 1 year ago
This new project by the 🎉fantastic🎉
@ebruevcen.bsky.social
shows in 4 studies that people’s first understanding of conditionals is pragmatic - using RT data, then with a cognitive load task. This is contrary to what’s found for other pragmatic inferences w/ interesting implications for acquisition.
add a skeleton here at some point
2
8
4
New preprint w
@drbarner.bsky.social
! When you hear, "If you mow the lawn, you’ll get $5," do you immediately think, "No $5 if I don't?" Turns out, that's no coincidence - we show that people start with pragmatic interpretations of conditionals, considering literal ones when necessary.
osf.io/mv3y8
loading . . .
OSF
https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/mv3y8
over 1 year ago
0
7
1
you reached the end!!
feeds!
log in