A thread about why the latest conspiracy-theory du jour about the Chinese sending fake ID's to the US so they can create fake absentee votes is complete nonsense. threadreaderapp.com/thread/19350...

Law Forward reaffirms commitment to rule of law, commends @govevers.wisconsin.gov's response to White House threats In response to two major developments yesterday, @lawfwd.bsky.social President & General Counsel Jeff Mandell issued the following statement: 1/9

Wisconsin has a history of fighting injustice. Judge Dugan is the latest example. opinion by @normeisen.bsky.social and @jeffmandell.bsky.social www.jsonline.com/story/opinio...

My latest, with @normeisen.bsky.social, on what's happening in Wisconsin.

A quick Wisconsin review of Trump’s new executive order: tl;dr – This does *not* change anything for our upcoming election for Supreme Court on April 1. Here’s why: 1/7

“An anti-constitutional act is one that rejects … the premise that sovereignty lies with the people, that ours is a government of limited and enumerated powers and that the officers of that government are bound by law.”

Take seriously what @danshafer.bsky.social says: “The cavalry is not coming. It’s up to us. As the perennial canary in the coal mine of every political issue, of course it’s up to us here in Wisconsin … to save our own democracy.”

As is often true, @joshtpm.bsky.social is precisely on point: “We’re in the midst of an authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. … [I]f we care about this country, everything we do right now has to be guided toward defeating this takeover.”

I’m on @pbswisconsin.bsky.social’s “Here and Now” with Frederica Freyberg tonight, discussing this week’s debate in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race.

Good morning. There's a motion hearing about to start in Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael Gableman, No. 2024AP2356-D. This is the disciplinary action arising from the ethics grievance that @lawfwd.bsky.social filed against Gableman in 2023. I'm listening in and will provide a running account.

Brad Schimel says that, if elected to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, he’ll be a “support network” for Trump. That’s not only gross but also incompatible with a judge’s obligations to hear cases impartially and to uphold the rule of law. 1/4

@robyablon.bsky.social hits the nail on the head in @contrariannews.org: "We now find ourselves in a world in which an outspoken foe of judicial independence is the most prominent financial backer of a candidate for a job that demands that very independence."

We should expect that those who serve on the Supreme Court of the United States, the highest court in the land, would take every possible step to ensure that they are above reproach. Instead, the Justices resist any ethical restrictions at all. 1/8

I have a new op-ed today in the @captimes.com about the Wisconsin Supreme Court election one month away. Democracy hangs in the balance, and I write about a recent judicial decision that illustrates that but has gotten remarkably little attention. It's hard to say what's most surprising:

Excited to join @lwvdanecounty.bsky.social for tonight’s discussion on “Choosing a Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice,” along with @robyablon.bsky.social, the Hon. Paul Higginbotham, and Marilyn Townsend.

Thank you, @wiaflcio.bsky.social for the invitation to speak at your annual Building Trades Conference this morning about @lawfwd.bsky.social’s work to restore democracy in Wisconsin.

Kloster has a history of partisan, disruptive, anti-democratic activity in Wisconsin. The incident in Green Bay is mentioned in this @pogo.org article by @schwellenbach.bsky.social, but leaves out some important details - www.pogo.org/investigatio...

Excited to return to @uchicagolaw.bsky.social today to speak with students about democracy litigation and the work @lawfwd.bsky.social does. Thanks to @acslaw.bsky.social for the invitation!

This is a perfect example of why Wisconsin needs to move past the gerrymander and restore a functional, deliberative legislature that is responsive to the people’s will. When the vast majority agree, no one legislator should have a unilateral veto.

Today’s petition for bypass to the Wisconsin Supreme Court seeks expedited resolution of this case. Wisconsinites have lived under the unconstitutional restrictions of Act 10 for too long.

x.com/jamiedupree/.... Video confirmation that @ronjohnsonwi.bsky.social was not “basically unaware” of the fraudulent-elector scheme, and that the attempted handoff of fake certificates was not a “staff-to-staff exchange.” For four years, everything he has said about his role has been false.

Thanks, @danshafer.bsky.social and @angelalang8.bsky.social for having me join the @maggiedaunshow.bsky.social on @civicmedia.us this afternoon to talk about the overturning of 2011 Wis. Act 10 and @lawfwd.bsky.social’s work to reverse the right-wing takeover of our state. Great to see you both!

It’s been a roller coaster year for democracy. As we approach the shortest, darkest day of the year, many feel bleak looking at our federal government and at chaotic, unsettling developments around the world. But the picture in Wisconsin is bright and provides real hope. 🧵

Today, @lawfwd.bsky.social filed a grievance with OLR asking for it to conduct an investigation into Jim Troupis’s role as quarterback in a calculated scheme to overturn the 2020 presidential election—an extraordinary abuse of legal expertise aimed at undermining our democracy.

Act 10—the union-busting law foisted upon WI by Scott Walker—has been ruled invalid, restoring public-sector workers’ basic rights. Within 1 year, @lawfwd.bsky.social has ended both Act 10 & the WI gerrymander, the twin cornerstones of last decade’s conservative takeover of our state. Forward!

Today is a good day for accountability in Wisconsin. It marks a major step forward in making clear that bad actors who attempt to undermine our democracy will face consequences for their conduct. 🧵