@mts-raoelison.bsky.social
📤 18
📥 20
📝 0
reposted by
Communications Psychology
2 months ago
People and LLMs evaluate deliberative reasoning more favorably than intuitive thinking—even when both yield accurate results. This preference appears to be intuitive itself and has implications for how we assess others’ and AI advise.
@wimdeneys.bsky.social
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
loading . . .
Humans and LLMs rate deliberation as superior to intuition on complex reasoning tasks - Communications Psychology
People and LLMs evaluate deliberative reasoning more favorably than intuitive thinking—even when both yield accurate results. This preference appears to be intuitive itself and has implications for how we assess others’ and AI advise.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-025-00320-8
0
9
4
reposted by
Wim De Neys
3 months ago
Paper is now published:
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
add a skeleton here at some point
0
8
4
reposted by
Laura Charbit
5 months ago
đź‘€ Just out in Thinking & Reasoning with
@boissinesther.bsky.social
@mts-raoelison.bsky.social
@wimdeneys.bsky.social
Curious how intuitive reasoning develops through adolescence? đź”—
www.tandfonline.com/eprint/KFH5K...
Quick summary👇
2
12
7
reposted by
Wim De Neys
10 months ago
New preprint: “Folk Thinking, Fast and Slow: Intuitive Preference for Deliberation in Humans and Machines” Pop culture often praises intuition (“Blink”, Steve Jobs). But do we really trust it? Across 13 studies, we find a strong intuitive preference for deliberation.
tinyurl.com/8r54dmyn
(1/6)
1
14
11
reposted by
Nicolas Beauvais
about 1 year ago
The reasoning team from LaPsyDE in New York for the
#SJDM
&
#Psychonomic
conferences!
@sjdm-tweets.bsky.social
@psychonomicsociety.bsky.social
w/
@ninafraniatte.bsky.social
@boissinesther.bsky.social
@lauracharbit.bsky.social
Matthieu Raoelison
@jeremiebeucler.bsky.social
&
@wimdeneys.bsky.social
1
11
7
you reached the end!!
feeds!
log in