In 2018, Eric Turkheimer took a bet with Charles Murray, who said that by 2025, the genetics of intelligence would be basically understood. Turkheimer knew otherwise. “I am here to declare that I was more right,” Turkheimer writes.

An excellent post by an insider's critique of applied behavioral genetics. open.substack.com/pub/ericturk...

I wonder if this piece was written using AI. While the description of my study is engaging, the story quotes me for something I never wrote or said. I brought the matter to to author's attention but got no reply. Still, I'm glad my work got some exposure. www.sciencenewstoday.org/dangerous-dn...

Our letter @philippbroniecki.bsky.social on what unites the right in the European Parliament is out in @eupthejournal.bsky.social , journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

📢 New research by Alexandre Morin-Chassé reveals that supporters of far-right parties in Scandinavia are more likely to believe genetics play a significant role in social outcomes compared to other party supporters. Read more about the findings on our blog RightNow! www.sv.uio.no/c-rex/englis...

Genetic essentialism more common among supporters of radical right-wing parties