Eric Eisner
@ericjeisner.bsky.social
đ¤ 38
đĽ 59
đ 0
History PhD student at Johns Hopkins. Studied law at Yale. Non-practicing rootless cosmopolitan.
reposted by
Eric Eisner
David Froomkin
about 1 month ago
This makes me think of a really interesting recent article by
@ericjeisner.bsky.social
about the pressure in southern legal systems to permit testimony from Black witnesses, because it was often helpful to white litigants and the white community.
www.cambridge.org/core/service...
add a skeleton here at some point
1
3
2
reposted by
Eric Eisner
David Froomkin
6 months ago
As
@ericjeisner.bsky.social
and I explain here, the Constitution is only as strong as the people who breathe life into its words. That's why John Tyler could get away with an unconstitutional claim to be presidentâan error that has stuck. If we don't stand up for the Constitution, it quickly erodes.
loading . . .
The Constitution Does Not Speak for Itself
In 1841, John Tyler said he was the president. The Constitution said he wasnât. What happened next?
https://www.hnn.us/article/the-constitution-does-not-speak-for-itself
0
10
5
reposted by
Eric Eisner
History News Network
6 months ago
Often, the media treat the Constitution as an inviolable, external limit on political life. There is no need to take seriously Trumpâs musings about a 3rd term, they assume. The Constitution forbids it. The Constitution forbid Tyler from claiming the presidency, too.
www.hnn.us/article/the-...
loading . . .
The Constitution Does Not Speak for Itself
In 1841, John Tyler said he was the president. The Constitution said he wasnât. What happened next?
https://www.hnn.us/article/the-constitution-does-not-speak-for-itself
1
4
2
reposted by
Eric Eisner
History News Network
6 months ago
đď¸ Read
@ericjeisner.bsky.social
and
@dfroomkin.bsky.social
on John Tyler and how âthe Constitution is only as strong as the people who breathe life into its words.â
www.hnn.us/article/the-...
loading . . .
The Constitution Does Not Speak for Itself
In 1841, John Tyler said he was the president. The Constitution said he wasnât. What happened next?
https://www.hnn.us/article/the-constitution-does-not-speak-for-itself
0
5
4
reposted by
Eric Eisner
Noah Rosenblum
6 months ago
Check out Part III for why even the cynical anti-democratic textual argument doesnât hold up on its own terms â with thanks to
@dfroomkin.bsky.social
and
@ericeisner.bsky.social
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
loading . . .
Officers
The Constitution speaks of âOfficers,â âOfficers of the United States,â and âOffices under [the Authority of] the United States.â Some scholars equate âOfficers
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5029416
1
13
4
reposted by
Eric Eisner
Noah Rosenblum
6 months ago
Now in a reputable news outlet. If you want careful legal analysis for why this wordsmithing fails on its own terms, see
@dfroomkin.bsky.social
and
@ericeisner.bsky.social
âs great article on Officers (link below). But donât let these conmen piss on your leg and tell you itâs raining.
add a skeleton here at some point
8
154
34
reposted by
Eric Eisner
David Froomkin
6 months ago
As
@ericjeisner.bsky.social
and I have argued, the word âelectionâ in the Constitution does not refer exclusively to a popular election. That's why the pre-Seventeenth Amendment Constitution could understand the selection of Senators by state legislatures as an âelection.â
loading . . .
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4395553
1
21
2
reposted by
Eric Eisner
David Froomkin
6 months ago
The idea that there is a "loophole" in the Twenty-second Amendment, such that someone can serve a third term as President without being "elected," is wrong. The argument misunderstands how the Constitution uses the word "election." The word "election" just means the selection of an official.
loading . . .
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=5029416
10
181
63
reposted by
Eric Eisner
David Froomkin
8 months ago
We are going to need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to sort out the wreckage of the Trump administration.
add a skeleton here at some point
1
7
5
reposted by
Eric Eisner
David Froomkin
9 months ago
Just posted: "The Substitution Clause," in which
@ericjeisner.bsky.social
and I argue that the Constitution's so-called Succession Clause is known by a misnomer. An officer performing the duties of an incapacitated President only acts as President; she does not become President. Comments welcome!
loading . . .
The Substitution Clause <br>
<div> There appears to be little controversy around counting John Tyler as the tenth President of the United States. When Tyler first claimed this title after
https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=5083505
0
7
3
reposted by
Eric Eisner
David Froomkin
11 months ago
I was going to wait to share my latest until it had passed through SSRN moderation, but apparently it is already getting downloads. In this paper,
@ericjeisner.bsky.social
and I investigate the overarching structure of the Constitution's officer/office provisions.
papers.ssrn.com/abstract=502...
2
18
7
you reached the end!!
feeds!
log in