Darren Newman
@daznewman.bsky.social
đ¤ 1316
đĽ 2321
đ 525
Employment Law trainer, writer, consultant, anorak:
https://rangeofreasonableresponses.com
reposted by
Darren Newman
Adam Bienkov
13 days ago
Has any other politician ever called a by-election on an explicitly anti-transparency, pro-sleaze ticket before?
51
1821
441
reposted by
Darren Newman
Kate Bevan
13 days ago
Thinking of opening a book on how long it will be between Farage finally shutting up and the first emergency podcast dropping
2
33
3
reposted by
Darren Newman
Will Jenningsđđłď¸
13 days ago
Remember that episode of The Thick of It with the press conference where the announcement is that there is no announcement...?
6
160
16
LNER is telling people not to travel today or tomorrow - but their trains are still running. Are they hoping that the trains will be empty? Or are they hoping that just the right number of people ignore their advice? It really isnât a helpful thing to say to people with travel plans.
27 days ago
1
1
0
Iâm sure this is the right decision, but it would have been nice to have a Darren in No 10. One day our time will come!
www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cw...
loading . . .
Darren Jones says he won't challenge Andy Burnham for Labour leadership - live updates
The prime minister's chief secretary was considering entering a contest - he now says "Andy Burnham is going to be the next prime minister".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cwyewjpwgk9t
27 days ago
1
4
0
Personally I think that Steve Bray has entertained us all for long enough. I would like him to announce a timetable for his departure.
29 days ago
1
10
1
So is this morning all about watching for a lectern in Downing Street?
2 months ago
1
2
0
reposted by
Darren Newman
Danie Ware
3 months ago
2
186
52
reposted by
Darren Newman
Institute for Government
3 months ago
The sacking of Olly Robbins has been badly handled by Keir Starmer. No.10's bullish response is further damaging the already fraught relationship between civil servants and ministers
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/mand...
loading . . .
The Mandelson vetting blame-game is causing serious damage to ministerial-civil service relations | Institute for Government
The sacking of Olly Robbins has been badly handled by Keir Starmer.
https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/mandelson-vetting-blame
1
9
6
add a skeleton here at some point
4 months ago
0
2
1
reposted by
Darren Newman
Colin Gorrie
5 months ago
Written English has barely changed in 300 years. If you can read Harry Potter, you can read Robinson Crusoe (1719).
26
1938
754
New timetable for implementing employment rights act pushes 'fire and rehire' changes back to January 2027
www.gov.uk/government/p...
loading . . .
Plan to Make Work Pay and Employment Rights Act: timeline update
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/implementing-the-plan-to-make-work-pay-and-employment-rights-act/plan-to-make-work-pay-and-employment-rights-act-timeline-update
6 months ago
0
1
0
Has Starmer just taken time on live TV to announce that he does not in fact plan to do anything?
6 months ago
0
5
2
Division on the abolition of the qualifying period! Very exciting!
7 months ago
0
5
0
Lord Vauxhall also minded to accept Government amendments. I think this is going to pass!
7 months ago
0
3
0
Clear Lib Dems wonât be blocking the Employment Rights Bill in the Lords.
7 months ago
0
4
1
Lord Fox for the Lib Demâs in the Lords endorses the six month qualifying period. But says there is unease about removing the compensation limit. Says the has been confusion about the word âliftâ but looks like LibDems will support Government.
7 months ago
0
0
0
I see the point but I have a nagging feeling that Cromwell. might also have had some issues with his behaviour towards others âHinchingbrooke School has five houses names after historical figures connected with its history, including Pepys and Oliver Cromwell.â
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
loading . . .
Pepys concern may lead to Hinchingbrooke School house change
The academy says it may rename a house over concerns about Samuel Pepys' historical treatment of women.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4ger4jvjq7o
8 months ago
1
2
0
reposted by
Darren Newman
Mark Tarran
8 months ago
I think section 15 of ERRA 2013 gives govt the power to change the cap (including removing the 52 week limit, and setting the cap anywhere from 1-3x median earnings) by Order, which must be approved by both Houses.
www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/2...
loading . . .
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013
An Act to make provision about the UK Green Investment Bank; to make provision about employment law; to establish and make provision about the Competition and Markets Authority and to abolish the Comp...
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/24/section/15
1
2
1
Well this seems to settle things. Will be interesting to see what now happens to the initial period of employment - itâs still in the Bill despite the Lordsâ amendments
add a skeleton here at some point
8 months ago
0
0
0
Division! This time on day one rights. Will the Lords insist on their imposition of a six month qualifying period? (I suspect they will)
8 months ago
1
3
1
Division! House of Lords voting on whether to insist on its ERB amendment allowing employees to opt out of being offered guaranteed hours.
8 months ago
1
1
0
For reasons I canât quite explain, this remains the funniest thing I have ever seen. Giggling now fourteen years later.
add a skeleton here at some point
8 months ago
1
4
0
@mrjamesob.bsky.social
- since youâre talking about it this morning!
add a skeleton here at some point
9 months ago
0
1
0
Following Last nights drubbing in the House of Lords over the Employment Rights Bill, I have a suggestion for the Government on how to deal with the qualifying period for unfair dismissal:
rangeofreasonableresponses.com/2025/10/29/t...
loading . . .
The Employment Rights Bill and day-one rights
The Employment Rights Bill failed to clear the final stage of its passage through Parliament last night. The House of Lords chose to insist on a number of amendments that had been rejected by the CâŚ
https://rangeofreasonableresponses.com/2025/10/29/the-employment-rights-bill-and-day-one-rights/
9 months ago
4
1
2
Altogether the Governments points would have been better made if they just let the civil servants who wrote the speeches conduct the debate. Watching Government front benchers read out the notes they were given was excruciating.
9 months ago
0
2
0
One last division - this time on the school staff negotiating body. Again, I wouldnât rate the governmentâs chances.
9 months ago
1
2
0
And now a division in union political funds. Government has lost every division so far so it doesnât bode well for them.
#employmentrightsbill
9 months ago
1
0
0
Government commits to a review of the right to be accompanied!
9 months ago
1
0
0
Bill will also go back to the commons to reconsider the unfair dismissal qualifying period. Government torn to shreds on that motion
9 months ago
0
4
2
Lords now voting on unfair dismissal as a day one right.
9 months ago
0
0
0
Moving on to Heritage railways now so this might get heated
#employmentrightsbill
9 months ago
1
1
0
Lord Foxâs amendment is carried. That means the Bill must go back to the Commons!
#employmentrightsbill
9 months ago
1
4
1
First Division is on Lord Foxâs amendment allowing workers to opt out of receiving guaranteed hours offers.
#employmentrightsbill
9 months ago
1
2
0
Government rather struggling in the Lords to defend a day one right to claim unfair dismissal
9 months ago
3
7
1
And they are done. Ministers are told to go off and draft reasons for the Lords explaining their disagreement to some of their amendments. Next stop the House of Lords
10 months ago
0
1
2
Now we come to the crux of matters- the employment of children on heritage railways
10 months ago
0
5
2
Government experiencing no difficulty in throwing out Lords amendments that were put forward by the Opposition. But itâs all very time consuming. Silly that they canât vote by pressing a button. They could all be home by now.
10 months ago
0
4
2
Asked about timetable for NDAs SoS says roadmap âstands as isâ All very well but the roadmap was published before the NDA ban was in the Bill so we still donât know when it will come in
10 months ago
0
4
0
Peter Kyle claiming that the Bill only relates to exploitative zero hours contracts. Hmmm
10 months ago
1
2
0
Looks like the Government is making one concession over the employment rights bill - offering a review of time off for public duties and the duties of special constables
10 months ago
0
1
0
As I suspected, the Commons debating Lords amendment to the Employment Rights Bill is kicking off over employing children on heritage railways
10 months ago
0
3
0
I donât know whether Ambassadors are technically employees or not. But of course in Mandlesonâs case it doesnât matter because he doesnât have two yearsâ service!
10 months ago
2
7
1
I have some thoughts on the reshuffle and the Employment Rights Bill.
rangeofreasonableresponses.com/2025/09/09/t...
loading . . .
The Reshuffle and the Employment Rights Bill
The cabinet reshuffle on Friday may well have major implications for the Employment Rights Bill. Of course, Angela Rayner was a key advocate for the Bill â but her departure alone would not hâŚ
https://rangeofreasonableresponses.com/2025/09/09/the-reshuffle-and-the-employment-rights-bill/
10 months ago
0
4
1
Just seen that Justin Madders has gone. Now have absolutely no idea what is going to happen to the Employment Rights Bill.
11 months ago
3
2
0
So we have a new cabinet minister responsible for the Employment Rights Bill?
add a skeleton here at some point
11 months ago
0
1
0
Slightly surprised to find that I have very little idea of who is actually in the cabinet. I used to be such a nerd about this sort of thing.
11 months ago
0
0
0
I know itâs a small thing in the overall picture but if Angela Rayner is forced out that might make a big difference to the implementation of the Employment Rights Bill.
11 months ago
1
1
0
Employment Rights Bill has been passed by the House of Lords. It now goes back to the Commons to consider the amendments that have been made.
11 months ago
1
1
1
Lord Burns proposing the words fullest ever amendment. He really needs to get out more
11 months ago
1
0
0
Load more
feeds!
log in