Chasing down abstracts while pulling records for citation chaining (in this case, backwards citation chaining) is no fun and reduces efficiency. Tools like Citation Chaser are awesome, but (as I noticed earlier this week) the process becomes less efficient when some records are missing abstracts.

Not liking this spreading practice where database providers now require use of an account to download any records or in specific formats (RIS); not even a small number. I know advanced users (including evidence synthesis librarians/researchers) will create their accounts and continue along but

Saw a post about moving searches out of custom folders in EBSCO, which reminded me to get on it. I moved 105 saved searches from 20 custom folders into one saved searches folder 😒. Thankfully, no renaming needed as I used this naming convention from the start: libguides.ucalgary.ca/DMPforSR/dat...

The 'Search History' screen on the new EBSCO UI now shows result numbers for each line. We can finally take screenshots to demonstrate the remaining problems 😅 - Happy Friday #IYKYK #Medlibs #CanMedlibs

I have been playing around in the new #EBSCO interface and have thoughts 😅 Has anyone noticed that the symbol used to combine queries in the new EBSCO interface is very similar to that used by #Scopus? And now I'm starting to see more similarities across the two systems 🤔 #Medlibs #ExpertSearching

They state "For publication or regulatory-grade systematic reviews, you will often have to default to traditional, keyword-based search methods" I guess, all researchers who thought they could do a "systematic review" in minutes and submit for journal publication are going to be disappointed!

Perhaps a small thing at a time like this, but I need @elicit.com to stop saying things like "regulatory-grade systematic reviews." If your tool doesn't meet the regulations, it's not doing a systematic review! WORDS MEAN THINGS.

🔥 Hot tip! Before starting a systematic review, make sure an information scientist/research assistant is part of the review team. They have specialised skills to develop and implement a comprehensive search strategy 🔎 synthesismanual.jbi.global #MedLibs #JBImethodology #EvidenceSynthesis

That feeling you get when you find THE error that is causing your search to misbehave 😁 #SearchGeek

It always surprises me when peer reviewers ask for details that aren't expected for the article type submitted. Example: A reviewer commenting on a protocol said they would have liked to see the results (and not in a "I look forward to seeing the results of the review" sort of way). #Reviewer2 😵‍💫

"Hey #EBSCO, See you at #CHLA2025 in Vancouver! Sponsoring a dance party might be the perfect way to help us shake off the memory of this morning’s surprise interface switch. We'll bring the moves, you bring the fixes. #JustSaying #ShakeItOff

Hey #medlibs and #canmedlibs ! Did you see the call for papers at CHLA is open? Come join us in Vancouver this June! Photo of my daughter riding the fire truck in Stanley Park: www.chla-absc.ca/welcome_to_c...

Happy to accept the compliments. Now I know what my cat persona would be 😅 - "a cat in a library chasing a laser pointer." My #BlueSkyRoast #Skybrarian blueskyroast.com/roast/srlibp...

In my hastiness to put this thread together, I oversimplified and said this incorrectly. Ovid allows ANY other word to take the place of the stop-word, not just any other stop-word. It retains the distance so (web "anyword" science) is how it sees it. ospguides.ovid.com/OSPguides/me...

I was working on a search and needed to search for "Web of Science", and ran into the stop-word issue again, so I needed to figure out how each of the database interfaces (Ovid, EBSCO, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest) handles it. #SearchTips #Medlibs #CanMedLibs As mentioned in the thread:

Ran into an issue while helping troubleshoot #Scopus today. Half the search strings were running fine, but the other half were not. Scopus would say "syntax error", but what? See screenshot from MS Word below. String looked normal to me. I tried replacing the usual suspects (quotes, brackets, etc)

Can't believe I didn't do this earlier in my career. I've started writing my #acknowledgments into the first draft of a manuscript (redacted) so I don't forget to add it in later.

Sadly, this doesn't work in the EBSCOhost interface. In fact, if you forget you did this & translate your search to CINAHL (for example), you will end up with a poor search. #EvidenceSynthesis Using the same example as earlier, if you tried the two options: "review* of review*" = 7495 results

Here is your semi-regular reminder about how to #search for phrases that include stop-words in Ovid databases. I use this tip a lot! Simply add a truncation symbol to the stop-word (tip courtesy of the amazing UX Caucus tips blog: uxcaucustips.blogspot.com/2022/06/tip-...).

2 minutes earlier: "Export service failed" <-- The message received when trying to export results from EBSCO APA PsycInfo, causing me panic & the resignation that I might have to do "the other tedious method" to get my export Now: Email arrived with a link to my export 😒 #Annoyed & #relieved. #Why

Was reading this recent article (doi.org/10.32384/jeahil20607) and noticed a couple of awesome things: 1) They used 6 datasets and included records from trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov and WHO ICTRP) alongside bibliographic databases. 2) This 👍 visual explaining terms incl precision and recall.

Months ago I asked #Librarians what flowchart-making tools they were using. Today I learned about Miro (miro.com), a whiteboard tool (& more). The flowchart or process diagram capabilities look great, & have some of the same cool features as Draw.io which is what I eventually used a few months ago.

New or did I just not notice it? Either way, happy to see it #CochraneHandbook Ch4 "Ovid MEDLINE (segment name ‘MEDALL’) covers all of the available content and metadata in PubMed with a delay of one working day... Aside from the MEDLINE records, Ovid includes all content types available in PubMed"

Hi I would like to repost this 5,000 times over the next five years please. Nurse faculty, the arbitrary five year limit has GOT TO GO! jmla.mlanet.org/ojs/jmla/art...

Happy to see the preprint syntax table cited in the revised Cochrane Handbook. Syntax table: lib.uvic.ca/preprintsear... Chapter 4 of the Handbook: training.cochrane.org/handbook/cur...

#Ovid - why must you misbehave? I was working with a student to refine an Ovid Medline #SystematicReview search today & every time we "edited" a line and tried to re-run it, it would timeout. This even happened when we worked from the 'saved searches' screen. I've never had this happen before. 😖😢

As I update slides for a SR workshop, I am reminded how much I love this table - for explaining the differences between #SystematicReviews, #ScopingReviews, and #MappingReviews. The inclusion of objective and scope information in the table is SO helpful. (DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.jc...).

Bluesky now has over 10 million users, and I was #326,912! 🤭

I am constantly impressed with Wikipedia as a source for synonyms. I used Higher Education as an example, and was impressed by en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tertiar... #SystematicReviews #Searching

Thankful for the presence of the Undo button during Title-Abstract screening in #Covidence 😅

A significant portion of my #SystematicReview work is teaching/consulting with students on their review #searches. I just wrapped up one such consultation and it was so much FUN! The student had the fundamentals of searching down - so working together to refine and improve their search was a joy

Just saw a review spell #CINAHL as "CIANHL". So, I thought to myself - that must be a rare occurrence - but it is not. A Google Scholar search returned more than 80 results, and the ones I scanned looked like misspellings of CINAHL based on the sentences they were in. #SysRev

For those of you publishing #SystematicReviews and stating that you searched according to PRISMA, please feel free to elaborate on how PRISMA directed you to search. This is all the PRISMA 2020 Checklist has to say about searching.

🤔 moment of the day: Was working on #DataExtraction for an #EvidenceSynthesis project, and came across an interesting inclusion criteria: articles that have perfect structure. Hmmm, I wonder how they evaluated that.

New Evidence Synthesis course available to learners everywhere libnews.umn.edu/2024/07/new-...

Happy "promotion notification" day to me 🥳. Super happy to be among the group of associate/librarian 3s. Time to put my feet up and relax for a couple of years 😆

#Reproducible search #Reporting is not just for #EvidenceSynthesis reviews. It should be required for studies about search methods; the search strategy is the data collection instrument. How can you #PeerReview a study about search methods if the searches are not provided? Where was #Reviewer2 😅

Research study: My milkshake is better than yours & will satisfy all your needs Me: OK, let me try it & show me the recipe Study: We do not have a sample or recipe to share with you. We tasted it so take our word for it - it is better Me: 😶 #TransparentMethods are not optional

#LESSS2024 My brain is wrestling w/ this. I think 2 things can be true: 1) I love that the librarians are doing data extraction training for users. That's so needed. and.. 2) I also wish that academic departments would take a lead on things like this so librarians could focus on lit search-y things.

Having "Graveyard" as a status in an ES program is awesome! Have to put those Zombie reviews somewhere 😆 #LESSS2024

What (free) tools/software do you all use when creating process diagrams or flow charts? #Librarian #LIS #MedLibs #CanMedLibs

I wish journals wouldn't feel so obliged to invite me to share my eminent work with them 🫠. If I've got something to share - nothing will stop me anyways!

Love note from an Evidence Synthesis librarian to authors: If you are going to use a new term (i.e. one that none of your references use), can you please include the previous term elsewhere in your abstract so we can find your paper. Please, & thanks! #SysRev #ExpertSearching #Medlibs

I've noticed this in the titles of reviews for a while. Inspired by a recent post on the bird app of an article that does this t.co/IKCjfbYTGx, & by the topic of that article (greenwashing), I think #PRISMAwashing is an appropriate name for this practice of including #PRISMA in the title of reviews.

Will 2024 be the year that ProQuest moves up the database platform rankings to surpass EBSCOhost? Only time will tell, but it sure is looking like a possibility #ExpertSearching #Librarians #Medlibs #SystematicReviews

I have bad news! This change in field description is not actioned. I tested it today 😭 I tested a TS search & compared it to TI, AB, AK, but the results were different. So, I tested TI, AB, AK, KP and the numbers matched TS. So, TS no longer mentions KP in the description but is still searching KP

For folks who use #WebofScience Core Collection and avoided using the Topic field because of the Keywords Plus field, you no longer need to do that. Topic now searches Title, Abstract, and Author-Keywords, and does not search Keywords Plus anymore 🥳 #ExpertSearching #MedLibs

Solved but confusing! Single term (no truncation) only returns exact titles ❌ Add * & it works ✔️ Example: SO=(palliative) ❌ SO=(palliative*) ✔️ SO=(palliative* care*) has the same result with/without "", & allows terms to be apart 🙄 SO=(palliative care*) looks for "palliative care*" as a phrase 🙃

Hey #ExpertSearching #Librarian #Medlibs folks, Is there a way to search a term in the publication title field in #WebofScience Core Collection? I tried the SO search field but it doesn't let me search using a keyword. It wants to force me to choose a specific title, which defeats the purpose 😱

New logo! Thanks @craftyhilary.bsky.social for pointing it out. Maybe this will help people understand that EBSCOhost is NOT a database 🤔? One can hope.