Why are some reviewers so confidently nasty? Is it necessary to be like that?! Don’t they understand how much work goes into each manuscript and how damaging it can be for some people to read the vitriol? Or even consider that they might be wrong?!

@senapati.bsky.social latest and greatest! Charly Treiber on board too. Over and out. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

Final extension until March 17 ☘️ at 12 noon Dublin time for abstract submission. Existing submissions are published on the website. Join us at @tcddublin.bsky.social in May to disseminate your research and listen to the latest findings by leaders in the field at all career stages.

Why academia is sleepwalking into self-destruction. My editorial @brain1878.bsky.social If you agree with the sentiments please repost. It's important for all our sakes to stop the madness academic.oup.com/brain/articl...

Pleasing to see that our Krashes et al 2009 study in the fly is the way it is in the mouse in 2024/5. www.biorxiv.org/content/bior...

Here's the paper www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

We are currently repeating key experiments of our multisensory learning study. We have communicated with the journal and will correct literature as necessary and as soon as possible. Please get in touch if this impacts your work. Thanks to those that raised a flag. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37100911/

It took us 11 years but: Dopaminergic systems create reward seeking despite adverse consequences www.nature.com/articles/s41...

Hello Bluesky peeps. Will start to post here from now on to see how it goes. Before anyone asks, my profile isn’t AI generated. It’s the real me 😂