Moritz and Coffey’s claim in the new Panorama that Letby was present for 40x the normal rate of tube dislodgements is based on an incredibly obvious conflation of two different metrics. She’s confused ‘ventilated shifts’ and nurses’ shifts. This *dramatically* skews the numbers against Letby.

A retrial has to occur, doesn’t it? @privateeyenews.bsky.social

@gabyhinsliff.bsky.social your article on Letby repeats two of the same mistakes as The Times’ “actual evidence” one: 1) Leaks recently received by David Rose show 10 incidents Evans thought suspicious that Letby wasn’t present for. Unsurprisingly they weren’t on the chart shows to the jury.