If you want to ask me questions about fully automated neofeudalism (or technically, "anything"), you can do so here at noon:

If you want a picture of a Democratic future, imagine hyper-engaged, suburban wine-moms stomping on J.D. Vance’s face — forever (or, you know, in the 2028 election) www.vox.com/politics/467...

Republicans have long worried that -- once Trump is gone -- the college graduates whom he alienated will remain Democrats, while the disengaged voters whom he mobilized will stop turning out. The 2025 election results make that scenario more plausible www.vox.com/politics/467...

Anyway, if you think Zohran is an incredible politician and Spanberger and Sherrill are boring establishment mods, then you should take last night's results as evidence in favor of the electoral power of moderation. But also who cares in a sense, give me all the protected bike lanes please.

Zohran is a generational political talent and I'm very happy he's mayor and Cuomo is not. Also Spanberger and Sherrill do not seem to be generational political talents and yet they obviously did very well and Republican turnout cratered in their elections.

Base strategies are good at turning out your base. Just one small problem.

Jacobin founder Bhaskar Sunkara argues that past socialist societies were wrong to think they could do without markets. But he insists that modern economies *can* do without capitalists I asked him: Why take that risk? Why not stick to what definitely works (ie Sweden)? www.vox.com/politics/467...

NYC's new mayor believes in democratic socialism But how would a democratic socialist economy actually work? To @sunraysunray.bsky.social, it would mean market competition and profit-driven firms - without capitalists. We debated his vision of market socialism www.vox.com/politics/467...

I loved this piece from @ericlevitz.bsky.social about one of the more plausible AI doomsday scenarios. Come for the jokes — this piece is funny, I swear! — and stay for the chance to stare into the abyss.

Elites have always depended on ordinary people's labor. Society has became more egalitarian as workers leveraged this power. But there is a risk that AI will eventually erode elites' dependence on the masses -- and usher in a permanent oligarchy. www.vox.com/the-highligh...

Robots can now do many parts of my job better than I can This has made me a bit anxious about my own obsolescence It has also led me to contemplate the one AI dystopia that I find plausible: A world where robots free elites of all dependence on most ordinary people. www.vox.com/the-highligh...

Highly-educated Democrats have very different priorities and policy preferences than Americans writ large. This is likely even more true of politically-engaged college grads. The mood in our circles/social media feeds is not a reliable guide to public opinion www.vox.com/politics/466...

Welcome PAC just released its case for Democrats to moderate. I asked the report's author my own greatest reservation about moderation on certain issues -- that the costs of such positioning feel certain, while the benefits are hypothetical. Here was his answer: www.vox.com/politics/466...

This week, Welcome PAC released its case for Democrats to moderate. I spoke with the author of its report, and pressed him on (nearly) every prominent, progressive objection to his analysis, including this one: www.vox.com/politics/466...

I think trying to deport millions of law-abiding immigrants is morally wrong. But even if you disagree, you should *still* oppose Trump's approach to enforcement -- so long as you value your own rights as a US citizen www.vox.com/politics/464...

Zohran Mamdani phasing out gifted programs for kindergarteners is fine. But in later grades, progressive opposition to "tracking" is misguided imo. Ability sorting can be beneficial for all students, when done right www.vox.com/politics/464...

When Democrats argue about whether "moderation" works, I think they often conflate two distinct questions: www.vox.com/politics/462...

This is really important. You can argue (if you want) that Kirk's alleged killer probably had syncretic political views, or that things are still "unclear." You cannot argue there is any affirmative evidence that he was a right-winger. This is not an ideological assertion. It is a statement of fact.

Trump is waging a war on American science and innovation. His $100,000 fee on H-1B visas will chase top researchers to other rich countries. In the long-term, our living standards will likely be lower as a result www.vox.com/politics/462...

The moment we deem ourselves immune to ideological chauvinism and unreason, we become more vulnerable to both. www.vox.com/politics/462...

Few people still need to hear this but: The Trump administration wants you to say that Charlie Kirk's killer was far-right www.vox.com/politics/462...

Joe Biden pressured social media companies to suppress anti-vax advocacy during the COVID pandemic. That raised legitimate free speech concerns. But Trump's attack on the First Amendment is vastly more egregious and profound. Conservatives shouldn't pretend otherwise www.vox.com/politics/462...

Trump's FCC isn't just threatening to take regulatory action against broadcasters who air criticism of the president. It has already done so. www.vox.com/politics/462...

Today would be a good day to support independent media -- ideally, the company that employs me -- but failing that, another of your choice www.vox.com/support-now

Conservatives have decided to honor Charlie Kirk's memory by embracing woke safety-ism www.vox.com/politics/461...

The right's response to Charlie Kirk's murder is nightmarishly Orwellian. Conservatives are signaling that the truth will be no obstacle to the sating of their bloodlust, nor to the exploitation of tragedy for partisan gain. www.vox.com/politics/461...

This man fomented an insurrection, then bestowed pardons and military honors on its perpetrators. Here, he praises "free speech," then attributes all political violence to his ideological foes and vows to crack down on their organizations. We're living in an Orwellian nightmare.

1) I wrote about the Democrats' "shutdown" debate. TLDR: A government shutdown aimed at imposing constraints on Trump's authoritarianism will fail. But Democrats should maybe do one, anyway. www.vox.com/politics/460...

Basically, I think @ericlevitz.bsky.social is right here in that Dems basically need to focus less on trying to lean into Abundance as a messaging theme and just hammer the left-populist messages that work *along* with doing good policy that works www.vox.com/politics/415...

I think @lioneltrolling.bsky.social is a great writer. I'm frequently jealous of his work and recommend purchasing his newsletter/book. But I also very strongly disagreed with his recent polemic against polling and wrote about why www.vox.com/politics/458...

1) The US economy is bending -- but not yet breaking -- beneath the weight of Trump's rightwing nationalism. The president's restrictive trade and immigration policies are largely responsible for the slowdown in economic growth. www.vox.com/politics/422...

The Democrats are historically unpopular. Wrote up 5 reasons to think they'll be OK anyway, and two to think the party is cooked www.vox.com/politics/421...

Donald Trump's official line on the Epstein case is that: 1) A vast Democratic conspiracy worked for years to forge documents implicating its enemies in child sex abuse. 2) He can't understand why his supporters would find that interesting. www.vox.com/politics/420...

The Trump administration's handling of the Epstein case is indisputably scandalous. If nothing else, it demonstrates the White House's flagrant dishonesty and staggering incompetence www.vox.com/politics/420...

Donald Trump broke the oldest rule of politics: If you're going to publicly acknowledge that your child sex trafficker friend likes women "on the younger side," don't *also* coyly reference a "wonderful secret" in your letters to him. www.vox.com/politics/420...

@ericlevitz.bsky.social did the math and no there are not 35m people just sitting around on Medicaid -- www.vox.com/politics/419...

The Trump administration wants to mass deport farmworkers, then send Medicaid recipients to the countryside www.vox.com/politics/419...

Trump's trade, mass deportation, and Medicaid agendas are all premised on the same wild lie www.vox.com/politics/419...

Wrote about the president's trade policy www.vox.com/politics/419...

In theory, the GOP sees environmental harm as an acceptable cost of making goods cheap and American industries competitive. In reality, the GOP is acting as though ecological destruction is an end in itself -- one worth sacrificing affordability and competitiveness to www.vox.com/politics/418...

My essay on how the decline of deep reading is (arguably) reshaping our consciousness, culture, and politics is out from behind the paywall www.vox.com/politics/414...

I wrote about what Democrats can (and can’t) learn from Mamdani’s stunning triumph Tuesday. One potential lesson: Portraying your opponent as anti-Israel isn’t a surefire winner in Democratic primaries anymore www.vox.com/politics/417...

Four years ago, America was on the cusp of the largest welfare state expansion since LBJ. Now, we're on the brink of the largest cut to public health insurance ever. And the outlook for growing the safety net in the future looks increasingly grim. I wrote about why www.vox.com/politics/417...

The root cause of Trump's radical new ICE policy is very dumb Trump successfully brought border crossings to a halt. But this caused his deportation numbers to fall below Biden's. So ICE is terrorizing longtime US residents until Trump can say he's got the bigger number www.vox.com/politics/416...

"Deep literacy encourages abstract thought. But abstractions can be morally beneficent or abominable, illuminating or obfuscatory." —@ericlevitz.bsky.social‬ for ‪@vox.com‬ www.vox.com/politics/414...

Americans are reading less. And even avid readers now struggle to concentrate on longform texts. Some analysts argue that this decline in "deep literacy" is poisoning our politics. I explored that theory (and my own brain rot) in a long piece you probably won't read www.vox.com/politics/414...

Democrats don't need to choose between making it easier to build stuff and soaking the rich. Abundance liberalism is compatible with economic populism -- if, by the latter, we mean a politics that redistributes income/power from the few to the many. www.vox.com/politics/415...

The Trump administration is systematically undermining American innovation -- gutting funding for scientific research and energy development, while chasing scientific talent from the country www.vox.com/technology/4...

This just isn't true. Far-right demographic panic definitely drives some natalist advocacy. But global fertility is on the cusp of falling below replacement. Absent major gains in automation, this is going to be a major source of economic strain during our lifetimes.

Some Dems say that tariffs are a sound tool for stopping firms from exploiting cheap labor abroad But if you impose tariffs on poor nations - w/o simultaneously offering an alternative development path - you just immiserate them (while lowering real wages in America too) www.vox.com/politics/407...