Very interested in these edge cases at the intersection of AI and human decision-making. More importantly, any paper with a title including a 'schm' prefix goes straight to the top of my reading pile ✅

Really interesting. My own research examines similar power asymmetries in the case of disabled children and nondisabled adults, both in family decision-making and in healthcare and education settings. Some striking structural parallels.

This is an important read, but with the context that the same headline could be written for most SEN services - substitute physical therapists, speech therapists, educational psychologists - the headline makes it sound like an isolated problem rather than one part of a systemic crisis

We have a new blog and newsletter! Sign up for free here: ethics-untangled.ghost.io

We're hiring! The Aristotelian Society is recruiting a new Managing Editor. This is a demanding part-time role suitable for a current graduate student to undertake alongside their studies. Deadline: Monday 18th May 2026. Read more here: mailchi.mp/9ec3fa312725...

...this is a really interesting article on epistemic injustice and young people's agency 🧵

Registrations for the Annual Uehiro Lectures 2026 are now open: uehiro.ox.ac.uk/2026-lecture... This lecture series, titled 'Moral Pressures: Bending Time, Shaping Wills', is going to be given by Prof Miranda Fricker, NYU. #Ethics #Practicalethics #Philosophymatters

Looking forward to listening to this. Competence, consent and parental decision-making for disabled children is territory I think about a lot

Banner photo: my grandmother, Helen Woolf, the only woman teaching at Westminster City School, 1951 (biology, and only because her chosen medical degree wasn't an option after her brothers had both trained as doctors)

We think parents know best for their young children. But 'knowing best' requires the ability to imagine your child's experience. What happens when you've never lived it?

Han Edgoose and I are organising a panel on Epistemic Injustice and Backlash at this year's MANCEPT Workshops! The call for abstracts is here, deadline May 1st: philevents.org/event/show/1...

Join us at the CRASSH Connections event 'Language, Ethics, and Society: Voices from research and AI' Listen to talks by two leading experts & connect with researchers, students, and professionals from across disciplines 19 March 12.30-2.30pm, Alison Richard Building, CB3 9DP https://bit.ly/4bkWZ78

Join us next Tuesday for a free online lunchtime talk, on the harms caused by #DigitalMisogyny 📅 This online talk, by @alex-fisher.bsky.social, will be held on Zoom from 1-2pm. Find out more: royalinstitutephilosophy.org/event/repres... #GenerativeAI #deepfakes #SocialMediaEthics #philosophy

Pleased to announce our workshop ‘Intimate (In)Justices’ at MANCEPT 2026 Co-convened alongside @kristin-kaeuper.bsky.social and Charlotte Curran from @clsrleeds.bsky.social research.manchester.ac.uk/en/activitie...

Highlights from the Women in Philosophy lecture series: Lucienne Spencer on epistemic injustice and dementia youtu.be/gUHCkcRwYKA... #philsky #epistemicinjustice

Issue 5 of The Journal of Philosophy of Disability (@jphildis.bsky.social) is out! Spread the word! #disability www.pdcnet.org/jpd/toc

I am yet to read this but pretty sure I could take a good guess at some of the reasons why

Join us for the Oxford-Cambridge-London Philosophy of Medicine Society talk by Stephen John (University of Cambridge) 🗓️ Friday 13 March 2026 3pm - 5pm 📍 In-Person, LSE Campus Abstract: www.lse.ac.uk/philosophy/e... #Philosophy #Medicine #PhilSci #LSEPhilosophy @ox.ac.uk

Well worth a read! This stuck with me: 'Dialogue—whether with a colleague or mentor, or, yes, even an AI—can be a corrective to that kind of tunnel vision' Absolutely this - and for students without mentors/colleagues available to work through ideas, AI could be a genuine leveller

unsure but I'm on board with calling him Andre from now on

This week's post is by Alexander Edlich (LMU Munich), and Alfred Archer (University of Tilburg) presenting their paper 'Rejecting Identities: Stigma and Hermeneutical Injustice' published in Social Epistemology. #philsky #philpsy imperfectcognitions....

Interesting post! Particularly like the distinction between calculators (converging on The Answer) vs LLMs (regressing to predictable averages)...

The Best Available Parent blog.apaonline.org/2026/02/10/t...

I wrote an article for @theconversation.com on how philosophy can help us understand the deep harms of AI-generated sexual images, e.g by Grok on X, as well as other digital misogyny like assault in virtual reality. #philsky #philtech theconversation.com/how-ai-gener...

In Professor Jo Wolff’s talk to membership, he discusses an argument against value-free science put forth by several papers published in Philosophy in the past 100 years. Join our membership for access to more upcoming members’ events: royalinstitutephilosophy.org/full-members...

On Slop and Shittification - my column for @thenewworldmag.bsky.social www.thenewworld.co.uk/everyday-phi... h/t Cory Doctorow

Really enjoyed this episode - and the whole series - applied ethics at its interdisciplinary best!

Is it a free gingerbread man, or is it systemic ableism? I have 5 children & have taken them all for the occasional Pret hot chocolate. My wheelchair-using 6 year old has been given a free gingerbread man on at least 50% of his visits… the others are yet to be gifted any baked goods. 🤔

This whole PhD endeavour was made worthwhile this week when my 6 year old was asked by a consultant what his parents did - and he replied 'my mum is a philosopher... my dad...umm I don't know, he works in his room' 👌

Confirmed programme for Structural Injustice conference in Cambridge on March 7th, to celebrate 5 recent books on the topic: www.polis.cam.ac.uk/events/struc...