We have reached a situation where (1) the time/resources spent by people applying for grant X often outweighs (2) the time/resources awarded. For these grants, society loses net time/resources. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

A new take on the limitations of "psychometric networks" now out in Nature Human Behavior. You don't want to put too much confidence in individual edges. Something we cautioned against in 2017. 1/2 www.nature.com/articles/s41...

We’re so proud of the MED Lab team for their excellent posters and presentations at VKC Science Day this week. Congratulations to Yinru @yinrulong.bsky.social , who won best research on underrepresented populations, and Ellie @elliewindham.bsky.social , who won best clinical poster!

We are currently accepting applications for a lab manager position to oversee the administration of multiple grant-funded research projects! More info below: ecsr.fa.us2.oraclecloud.com/hcmUI/Candid...

I can't recommend this opportunity highly enough - the combination of fascinating, impactful work and excellent mentorship make this a top-notch training experience!

So devastating

ESM Experts, please help! We have EMA surveys asking pts about best/worst event over 2 hrs. Many say no worst event happened, but we allowed them to provide emotion ratings. Should those ratings be excluded from MLM/DSEM models of emotional reactivity? Treated as a neutral condition? Another option?

Wow. I’ve expressed concerns about Frontiers for a long time and won’t submit or review for them, but this suggests things are really bad.

I’ve been thinking a lot about how research pace is eclipsed by rate of change in technologies. Many books/articles make claims that aren’t supported by evidence, but research often can’t match need for decision making in the population. How do we adapt to make quality info available sooner?