US intervening directly in a foreign country's politics in a way that conflicts with Trump's supposed "transactionalism." We continue to have a "values-based" foreign policy, just with a different inflection www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

There is still *one day* left to post a public comment in response to this proposed regulation. You can do so here: www.federalregister.gov/documents/20... either under your name (as I did) or anonymously. There are currently more than 17,000 comments - it's a lot, but still room for more!

"...particularly for an administration that has eschewed large foreign interventions" I really wish reporters would stop credulously repeating this claim - it doesn't hold up when you actually look at this admin's foreign policy (Brazil, Europe, Iran, now Argentina, you name it!)

Alternative way of looking at this: if you are interested in promoting elite splits in the regime and its support network, this very much could be the way…

One of the greatest safeguards for American democracy (in contrast with other backsliding cases) is the decentralized nature of its election infrastructure, in the hands of states/localities. The Trump administration is trying to whittle that away. Alarming new report with some of the details:

This is a major escalation in the Hun dynasty's efforts to crush any opposition to its rule in #Cambodia. This new law allows the gov to arbitrarily revoke citizenship from anyone it deems to be "conspiring" against the state A brief 🧵 on potential implications

I don’t really think this is a fair characterization. The number of times I’ve seen the US compared *by Americans* to 1930s Germany, or Peronist Argentina, or Orban’s Hungary… There’s also the perils of over-indexing on others’ experiences. Providing historical context from the US is helpful!

This is a major escalation in the Hun dynasty's efforts to crush any opposition to its rule in #Cambodia. This new law allows the gov to arbitrarily revoke citizenship from anyone it deems to be "conspiring" against the state A brief 🧵 on potential implications

The US cuts are obviously the most dramatic and make up a huge share of the total drop in ODA. But there are pretty steep declines elsewhere, and they are all compounding one another

This is likely to have significant immediate and longer term implications for democracy and human rights struggles. These numbers are pretty dramatic (although giving everything not hugely surprising)

The echoes of Cambodia, Venezuela, and elsewhere are very strong here. Turkey’s “nearly stunning election” in 2023 lit the spark for extreme backlash and an effort to extinguish opposition I discuss more here: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

Once again, my IR research agendas are converging! Opposition politicians conducting international outreach/advocacy + a repurposing of the “values-based” foreign policy/freedom agenda by right-wing actors

Once again, my IR research agendas are converging! Opposition politicians conducting international outreach/advocacy + a repurposing of the “values-based” foreign policy/freedom agenda by right-wing actors

Useful to break down which threats are just bluster and which have teeth. In the case of proposed election-related exec order (discussed here), there's no statutory power, but there is the power of persuasion So the threat really comes from states voluntarily moving to come into line with the EO

I have mixed feelings about this bc I have great respect for Cambodian rights defenders. But I really do not think Cambodia holds many positive lessons for the struggle for/defense of democracy Tbh, it’s a cautionary tale of how liberal rhetoric and commitments can manifestly fail to produce change

Useful to break down which threats are just bluster and which have teeth. In the case of proposed election-related exec order (discussed here), there's no statutory power, but there is the power of persuasion So the threat really comes from states voluntarily moving to come into line with the EO

Not just far right. It’s a hallmark of authoritarian regimes broadly Propaganda can serve multiple purposes. Sometimes to convince, sometimes to bolster cohesion in the ruling group. And sometimes it’s a display of dominance (you *have* to believe ridiculous things because I hold the power)

Key is that there is no perfect comparison case, and we’re probably better off learning from across cases and not over-indexing. Beyond those already mentioned, Argentina, Thailand, Venezuela, Poland, Philippines… they all provide lessons. But no single case explains our predicament or our future

This consensus is correct. But I don't think enough people have actually internalized the implications. That is, they're perfectly happy to point out that too many Dem officials don't understand this, but they haven't updated their own understanding of what this means for taking the country back.

Worth noting here that Orban is currently threatened by a new opposition force, which came from his *own* coalition and largely supports his conservative policy goals. Unclear if they will ultimately take power, but there's a lesson there: sometimes you have to make ideological compromises to win

Another critical point here. If you believe we are operating under authoritarianism already then you have *zero* excuse to make maximalist policy demands of your coalition. The #1 priority is defeating the dictator, not getting a politician to say words that make you feel good or correct

Very important point in an excellent thread. If we are operating in the zone of competitive authoritarianism, winning the midterms is both important and incredibly dangerous. It could resemble a set of cases that I have written about here: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

Alarming development. A direct attack on the separation of powers, a usurpation of Congressional authority. If the Supreme Court allows this to stand, that's the whole ballgame. They're doing this to provoke a fight they expect to win www.politico.com/news/2025/08...

I've added my comment. I'm not sure if it will change anything, but it's a small amount of effort to try

For those justifiably concerned/angry about this, there's a way to make your voices heard. Public notice and comment on this proposed rule goes through Sep 27 Go to this link and click "Submit a public comment" at the top: www.federalregister.gov/documents/20...

I know there's a lot happening today, but this is sneaking in under the radar. This proposed new rule would absolutely crush foreign PhD students, potentially making it impossible for them to enroll with any certainty of their ability to finish www.politico.com/news/2025/08...

“a U.S.-sanctioned human rights abuser, continues to use Brazil’s institutions to silence opposition and threaten democracy” Democracy promotion back on the menu I guess? The US just can’t quit a “values-based” foreign policy

On Meet the Press today, a US official clearly stated that tariffs on Brazil were imposed in response to “lawfare” The new “values-based” foreign policy in action. Trump officials disparage “liberal interventionism” but can’t quit the rhetoric or actions of it - just targeted at political enemies

The new “values-based” foreign policy strikes again! foreignpolicy.com/2025/05/27/u...

The new “values-based” foreign policy strikes again! foreignpolicy.com/2025/05/27/u...

Fascinating details in here about what’s going on behind the scenes on US #Myanmar policy Confirms that recent sanctions relief for cronies was not part of an overarching policy shift, but one may still be coming. Seems like no one in the admin has any real sense of Myanmar tho t.co/37PVBQrYEY

“OFAC’s July 2025 delistings are neither a weakening of U.S. policy nor a reward for good behavior. They are costly, technical legal outcomes happening in many sanctioned countries.” #Myanmar #sanctions english.dvb.no/understandin...

One point that I haven't seen discussed in the context of the Columbia deal is the fact that it only addresses the currently frozen funds. So they pay $200 mil to get back $400 mil in funding. But they'll still have to contend with major funding cuts and caps on overhead for the foreseeable future

The US’s new “values-based” foreign policy is increasingly zeroing in on Europe and platform regulation as key priority areas This type of rhetoric was previously reserved for the worst dictatorships. Now it’s deployed against allies

The US’s new “values-based” foreign policy is increasingly zeroing in on Europe and platform regulation as key priority areas This type of rhetoric was previously reserved for the worst dictatorships. Now it’s deployed against allies

More on the new values-based foreign policy here: foreignpolicy.com/2025/05/27/u...

Rubio just ordered sanctions against Brazil’s Supreme Court for proceeding with the case against former Pres Bolsonaro. Incredible example of the new “values-based” foreign policy in action: Using the tools of statecraft to punish perceived offenses against right wingers abroad

Represents a major shift in US foreign policy: A new memo from Sec of State Rubio orders statements on foreign elections to “avoid opining on the fairness or integrity of an electoral process, its legitimacy, or the democratic values of the country in question.” www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

A massive "fuck you" to an important country in an important region. Add this to the number of ways the US is failing to compete with China in the Indo-Pacific. Setting America's reputation on fire to please a base that's way too online www.politico.com/news/2025/07...

This is a classic dilemma for opposition politicians calling for international pressure in autocracies (the focus of much of my research!). Easy to get painted as “tools of foreign interference.” Now becomes increasingly relevant in democracies as well

From the US Embassy in Brazil (!!): "The political persecution against [Bolsonaro, his family], and their supporters, is a disgrace and falls well below the dignity of Brazil’s democratic traditions" Bizarro World democracy promotion

Trump threatens Brazil with 50% tariffs to, in his words, "rectify the grave injustices of the current [Brazilian] regime" - in this case, prosecuting former Pres Bolsonaro Using the tools of economic statecraft to try and protect ideological buddies abroad www.nytimes.com/live/2025/07...

Weaponized interdependence for regime change. This will only accelerate efforts to work around US platforms and infrastructures.

Trump threatens Brazil with 50% tariffs to, in his words, "rectify the grave injustices of the current [Brazilian] regime" - in this case, prosecuting former Pres Bolsonaro Using the tools of economic statecraft to try and protect ideological buddies abroad www.nytimes.com/live/2025/07...

It is a heartbreaking day for many, many people who worked in the broader foreign assistance, foreign policy, and journalism worlds. USAID, RFE/RL, Radio Free Asia—all illegally closed. Hundreds of State Dept employees being laid off right now. Hundreds more grants being terminated.

Today is the last day to comment on schedule F, Russ Vought's plan to politicize the civil service, by making many positions political appointments. Please take the time to comment today. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/last-day-t...

Fascinating White House response to the South Korean election result in which the liberal candidate won Has the hallmarks of the new “values-based” foreign policy: expressing concerns about foreign election interference and fate of “democracy” bc the preferred candidate lost

You'd be surprised. New @ezraklein.bsky.social podcast with @emmamashford.bsky.social takes the admin seriously about "America First" credentials and "privileging U.S. interests" www.nytimes.com/2025/06/03/o... Coverage of Trump's Riyadh speech had the same tone. It's pervasive and the default lens

The NED, NDI, and IRI are three organizations that lead global democracy programs and give people the tools they need to self-govern effectively. For generations, their work has been instrumental in making our country safer and more prosperous. (2/3)