all i want to do is read old social theory and apply it to new stuff but i dont want to start a substack. help lol

best place to start for defining "slop" is Weberian theory. one key aspect there, and for slop, is understanding the link between rationalization and irrationality ie "slop" is often used to describe both that which is "fully optimized" *and* chaotic purposeless hallucinations

yes - better than trying to arbitrate what has "soul" or not is to critique that which is centrally conceived and controlled, made primarily to be efficient and profitable, AI or not

NOW ONLINE: The lastest special issue of Photography & Culture on «AI and Photography», guest-edited by Briankle Chang and Sarah M. Miller and featuring among others my essay «Images from Images: Generative AI and the Reconfiguration of the ‹Photographic›» #OpenAccess

My new article, Bio-AI: The Aesthetics and Ethics of Data Animism, is out from Culture Machine. Part of a special issue on The Aesthetics of Biomachines edited by Johan Lau Munkholm, Naja Grundtmann, Kristin Veel & Kathrin Maurer. culturemachine.net/vol-24-aesth...

i.e. chatbot use can restructure our means for self-knowledge, routing what was once "introspection" through a tech company's servers and its ideological modulations

i mean, "a tradable asset out of any difference in opinion" is pretty much the underlying philosophy of metrics based gamified social media, from twitter to instagram to this place

feels like the right question! why should people think something that was previously inhuman slop now being slop thats even less human is especially noteworthy?

hate social media platforms pitching themselves as real an authentic more than any of the fakery happening elsewhere

"smart" podcasts as a form leverage the feeling of thought and sociality to get people to consume content that, if written, would seem remedial or downright dumb thebaffler.com/outbursts/th...

Read my new essay about the shriveled imagination of the life-extension guys!! On Bryan Johnson, communist cybernetics, and the Human Centipede. And if you're in NY, head to the launch party in Brooklyn tonight for Empty Set mag (Dear Friends Books, 7pm🩸) www.emptysetmag.com/articles/blo...

"people no longer have a choice but to assume that everything is false" they keep saying this but thats just obviously not what is happening. again, better Q: what accounts for the enduring truth-telling function of images? (fromhttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/19/opinion/ai-sora-slop.html)

i dont think real vs fake is whats at stake here (the political valence of AI is). none of these examples are pitching the AI imagery as real. "fake imagery" is a weird term for this slop bc wouldnt that also encompass most art and memes etc?

read this same take every month for years even though there's a constant stream of newsy widely-believed video happening all around us the better question is: what accounts for the enduring truth-telling function of cameras in an age where believable fakes are easy to generate?

that users could prefer a generated simulation to actual old clips for nostalgia purposes clarifies how nostalgia is about consuming "decontextualization" in itself — nostalgia negates history under the auspices of longing for it

telling that so many (good and correct) critiques of AI sound exactly like the main critiques of the media culture AI was born into

telling that Meta didn't attempt to make compelling little AI clips for their ad. the commercial instead is just "this AI product will have AI," nothing more. bc they dont need to convince *why* anyone needs AI products, they just need to demonstrate they are burning money in that field

LLMs mean that no one has to write anything they don't care about, but they also mean that "writing anything" will get equated with "not caring" for most people. (If you really cared, you would video yourself talking about it on your phone.)

"the end of social media" takes often need to make a too-clean distinction between public broadcast platforms and private group sharing. a lot of social-media-like energy exists in the gradients in-between

still think about this enduring truth-telling function of cameras with most every big news event

am also dying at the ad in this video for a scam news app that will give you a fake number for how true articles are lol

Google has an AI "camera coach" in their camera app to help people forfeit their own eye and voice to make more productive images normalized by attention metrics (~2mins in)

everything, no matter how much it epitomized rational fake empty nothingness in its time, eventually comes to be something remembered as real and felt nostalgic for

was asked, along with some others, how i approach looking at every photographs everydayphotography.org/journal/eido... the eidolon centre is so cool

"the looking-glass self", Charles Horton Cooley (1902) lol this "new trend" is just what identity has always been

looks like shit but this stuff isnt failing at looking good, it is succeeding at selling the idea of total data enclosure and god view witnessing

One of the reasons I love going on @parismarx.com’s show isn’t just because we get deep into the issues but because I can also talk about Canadian media policy, which is super interesting!!

good! food delivery slop and AI image slop deserve each other. the fake images dont mislead, they accurately convey the desire for crappy food made and delivered in unethical ways

"Most of the slop we see is still made and distributed by real people, often with no AI assistance" kneelingbus.substack.com/p/slop-as-a-... such a key point

fun time at the @404media.co event in LA! i liked the conversation at the end about the dangers of protest surveillance vs people wanting to be filmed

*we have a product, and while we cant say what it is or how it works, it will give you everything you could ever want* www.meta.com/superintelli...

Constant exposure to algorithmic feeds makes it feel unusual and almost transgressive to conceive a desire that isn’t prompted or anticipated by the content delivery system

honestly a good and accurate phrase for algorithmic content, "empathy" as a superficial, consumerist spectacle

imagine thinking "funny" or any of these are some kind of linear slider this is so Zuck brained, the idea that sociality can be reduced to numbers, then sorted and ranked and made manageable

this made me realize how much cheffy fine dining, from the interiors to the food, has long looked AI generated. that same glossy, wasteful, visual appeal www.nytimes.com/2025/06/02/d...

It's a strange form of irony to illustrate an article on «human creativity as a natural resource» with blandest, most generic stock images available from the Getty archives – not to mention that if you think of «human creativity» as a «resource», you've already adopted an extractivist mindset

agree. the big problem here *preceded AI* critique AI but at the same time also critique anything AI can so easily replace (this is re:the Sun Times AI generated reading list)

Critical humanities discourse on AI will be doomed if it does not come up with better metaphors. Corporate AI is not a «cognitive entity» or some «other intelligence». It's a political project and a system of surveillance, extraction & exploitation 1/

this app asks the users to see the world as a machine does, to not just interact with AI but to develop an AI Vision of your world and your self [learned of it from here: www.phonetime.news/p/i-tried-th...

AI cheating, AI "slop," this stuff proliferates anywhere social relations had already been highly instrumentalized. fuck AI but lets not retcon systems so anti-social that AI could be successful within them

The thing about AI classroom cheating that gets me is that it's incredibly easy to solve BEFORE you start taking into account the various other pressures ruining American education. In a freshly conceived teaching environment, sure, no problem. But in schools as they exist it feels insurmountable

New from me! For Dilettante Army (& visionary editor Sara Clugage) I wrote a deep/dark analysis of the foul and tacky "golden pager" trophy that Netanyahu gifted Trump back in Feb. This is about trees, circuits, jokes, images, explosions, kitsch, evil. dilettantearmy.com/articles/gol...

interacting with an AI can only seem fulfilling because platforms trained these folks to treat other humans in such an instrumental way people are reduced to numbers when discourse is ranked with metrics and sorted through algorithms, so why not just speak to AI?

every definition and description of "AI Slop" reads to me as what for-profit, highly metricized, and algorithmic platforms have always done. making it primarily an "AI" issue lets the platforms and this general logic too much off the hook imo

"When communication is filtered through algorithms, it becomes as if spoken by algorithms" algorithms dont sort content, metrics dont measure it, both precede and *produce* content. and preclude sociality.