It's been a long road, starting with a judicial confirmation fight in 2005. But the progressive case against abolition—that the filibuster protects people from a far-right agenda—crashed into Republican aggression. Republicans get what they want filibuster or no. www.offmessage.net/p/filibuster...

Me. I'm a mad scientist. (Paul Noth cartoons)

One court decision, two different headlines. Guardian on the left, NY Times on the right. Which one more directly conveys information and the stakes to the reader?

If Dems talked like this regularly, we wouldn't have to focus on "how to win close elections in difficult environments." We would have a lot fewer close elections, and a lot fewer difficult environments.

It is important to promise, now, that whatever Trump builds at the White House will be torn down as soon as he leaves. www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/if-he-buil...

"These findings highlight the divergence between what the candidate emphasized and what the media reported" hmmmmm www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi...

May this portion of the dissent by Ketanji Brown Jackson haunt John Roberts forever and be the final word on his tenure as Chief Justice.

yeah that’s because it’s a lot easier to tear everything down than build durable government programs that help people

Congrats to the Rutgers Agrivoltaics Program for completing their vertical PV system to research how solar can co-locate with agriculture. Looking forward to seeing more projects like this in New Jersey!