Closing the Knowledge Transfer Gap in Construction: Why CrewMind Matters Now open.substack.com/pub/wastegua...

Contech article featuring the knowledge-transfer gap in the industry and presenting a possible solution for it : CrewMind. Check it out here: wasteguard.substack.com/p/closing-th...

yes: www.energy.gov/sites/defaul...

Turn those into formal comments to the EPA.

No surprise at all. Just a read of the Executive Summary shows it to be nothing more than a re-hash of old denier talking points. "U.S. policy actions are expected to have undetectably small direct impacts on the global climate and any effects will emerge only with long delays." Simply untrue.

Filling a gap in the construction industry: KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER Here is a platform that centralizes knowledge transfer from experienced workers to novices and facilitates the process in a single platform: crewmind.org Thoughts anyone?

The "Construction Physics" newsletter this week had a very real truth about the industry that I think is important for everyone to realize. The software we are building here at Wasteguard Innovations will help to mitigate this aspect of construction and pave the way for change in the industry.

SUSTAINABILITY FROM SPACE Interesting take on how looking at the earth from a higher viewpoint (from space, specifically) brings into context the bigger picture of what's really important, and how change is needed. www.msn.com/en-us/money/...

This Energy Department report is cited nearly two dozen times in the EPA's rollback of the endangerment finding and some of the claims are, well, let's look at a few of them

New Blog Post: EPA Waste-Data Inaccuracies: Why WasteGuard Innovations Matters More Than Ever wasteguardinnovations.com/blog#epa-was...

We have lost our founder and CEO, Marcial Carrillo. It saddens our heart to loose you Marcial, the company's not going to be the same without you. But I'll still try my best to create the vision you've instilled in me and our company. God Bless. - Jesse Griffin

Re-evaluating Construction Waste : A Value-Based Approach to Economic and Environmental Impact By: Marcial Carrillo & Jesse Griffin open.substack.com/pub/wastegua...

Wasteguard Innovations wasteguard.substack.com?r=5dx4xr&utm...

First SUBSTACK post!

wasteguardinnovations.com/blog wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper

@tableunstable.bsky.social Something I'd like to get your feedback on : wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper

Construction (C&D) Waste - Weight vs. Value In a whitepaper by Wasteguard Innovations, we analyze the accuracy of EPA estimations of C&D waste and conclude that VALUE, NOT WEIGHT, should be the metric for properly gauging C&D waste. Read more here: wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper

Current methods, like those used by the EPA, measure construction and demolition (C&D) waste by **weight**. This simple metric creates a distorted picture, masking the true economic and environmental cost of what we throw away. Whitepaper: wasteguard.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/Construction...

We've published a new whitepaper detailing the inaccuracy of figures in which construction waste is estimated by the EPA: High level perspective: www.wasteguardinnovations.com/whitepaper Whitepaper: wasteguard.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/Construction... Let us know what you think!

The response from Chat-GPT Wasteguard Innovations: Feasibility Analysis Final Verdict: High Success Potential With clear financial incentives, government backing, and a fundamentally sound AI approach, this solution is highly feasible and could revolutionize material efficiency in construction.

this is whhttps://www.epa.gov/smm/sustainable-management-construction-and-demolition-materials this is what the EPA has to say about c&d waste

"More than 75% of all construction waste from wood, drywall, asphalt shingles, bricks and clay tiles ends up in landfills. (EPA)" THE ONLY PROBLEMS WITH THIS: The stat is based on pure tonage (i.e. waste) when VALUE should be considered instead. By the time concrete goes to dump, its worth $0.

www.census.gov/construction... $2.19 Trillion was spent on construction in January, 2025 (as per census). Roughly half of that was on materials. That means that over a Trillion dollars was spent on construction materials. 30% of the cost of materials ends up in the trash. ~$300 Billion/mo.

Test URL of the image to feature Body of post

MODAPTS We will start integrating the MODAPTS system into our processes and procedures so that our platform better aligns with industry standards for repeated work to help solve the problems of inefficiency and waste in the construction industry. Check us out at wasteguardinnovations.com.

The website is back online. Check out our solution to the $300 Billion dollar / yr value of materials that end up in a landfill at the end of every construction project in America. www.wasteguardinnovations.com

Half of the monthly spending on construction is the amount we spend on materials . 30% of 1000 billion is 300 billion monthly savings. Wasteguard aims to achieve these goals and many more for the environment, the economy, and most importantly for humanity. Follow us on our journey. Like and share

wasteguard innovations will do more for climate change than any mitigations they are using now we are going to change the way the world does construction

file:///C:/Users/Marcial%20Carrillo/Downloads/Pomponi_et_al-2016-Journal_of_Environmental_Management-AM.pdf Here's a comprehensive study about embedded carbon and the mitigations used to battle the problem even the experts say no mitigations that they That they use helps nothing works till now

Wasteguard

Wasteguard

www.census.gov/construction... $2.19 Trillion was spent on construction in January, 2025 (as per census). Roughly half of that was on materials. That means that over a Trillion dollars was spent on construction materials. 30% of the cost of materials ends up in the trash. ~$300 Billion/mo.

"More than 75% of all construction waste from wood, drywall, asphalt shingles, bricks and clay tiles ends up in landfills. (EPA)" THE ONLY PROBLEMS WITH THIS: The stat is based on pure tonage (i.e. waste) when VALUE should be considered instead. By the time concrete goes to dump, its worth $0.

this is whhttps://www.epa.gov/smm/sustainable-management-construction-and-demolition-materials this is what the EPA has to say about c&d waste

The response from Chat-GPT Wasteguard Innovations: Feasibility Analysis Final Verdict: High Success Potential With clear financial incentives, government backing, and a fundamentally sound AI approach, this solution is highly feasible and could revolutionize material efficiency in construction.