🚨NEW PUBLICATION🗞️ We are thrilled to share the publication by our own Alipio Ferreira @alipiof.bsky.social in Scientific Reports. 🌳Using a field experiment in Brazil, the paper finds little advantage of VR relative to 2D messaging to promote conservation attitudes. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

@gaveltri.bsky.social and I have a new paper (in Open Access) in Frontiers in Behavioural Economics. We explore how understanding heterogeneity, can lead to better knowledge of mechanisms of BPP toolkits, which then allows us to personalise delivery of BIs. Read more here: doi.org/10.3389/frbh...

Calling all Behavioural Scientists working in #sustainablefood!! We've just launched a special issue in Frontiers on the topic: Where Next for Behaviour Science to Promote a Sustainable Food System? Your submissions are welcome! Issue scope & links below: www.frontiersin.org/research-top...

People are different and so should be behavioural interventions. My key note today to UK businesses in built environment working on retrofits, at the Annual Briefing 2024 organised by #BSRIA. Pleasure to speak w Baroness Brown, Hamish Taylor, Richard Fetton et al. www.linkedin.com/posts/bsria_...

The secret sauce to effective policy making in governments is “empiricism”, @davidhalpern.bsky.social in his keynote to policy professional graduates of our School for Government @King’s in the PGL2 alumni event yesterday! Also the fab @michaelsanders.bsky.social starts as director of SfG today!!

Fun panel yesterday, by @lsepbs.bsky.social on Reproducibility & AI. Chaired by @mmglz.bsky.social, spoke alongside Dario Krpan, @sakshighai.bsky.social! Big q’s: 1. Big trade offs? 2. Diversity in models? 3. Inequalities in access? 4. What’s next? Recording soon: www.lse.ac.uk/library/rese...

For a while, Giuseppe & I have been thinking about using CSS to answer some of the pertinent questions in BeSci. We explain in this piece forthcoming in Fron. in Beh. Econ., understanding heterogeneity could be a way to explain mechanisms which help personalise: www.frontiersin.org/journals/beh...

Vaccine effectiveness ⬆️ support for stringent vaccination #policies, albeit w limits. Our new paper in @SciReports finds in #G7 (42,417 rep. sample). W @richardpkoenig.bsky.social ManuS @blakelw.bsky.social @JohnA AndrewH PeterJ @brendannyhan.bsky.social www.nature.com/articles/s41...

As VU Amsterdam put “new way of nudging leads to a more sustainable meal” Summary here: vu.nl/en/news/2023... Read more about our recent paper in Nature Sustainability here: www.nature.com/articles/s41...

#Hotoffthepress After 6 years of (hard) work, so happy to see my last #PhD chapter now out in #Nature #Sustainability. Joint w @mmglz.bsky.social, Peter John and Susana Mourato, we should reflection before a nudge improves sustainable dietary choices. www.nature.com/articles/s41... Wdyt?

My review out of a cool book on “Political Economy of Behavioural Public Policy” by Adam Oliver. Read more here: blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofb... @lsepbs.bsky.social

Probably for the first time in my *short career* I heard positive things from both reviewers. Also, this is the first journal we sent to. Makes me question, if I did the right research after all, no one criticises it? Funny how we question ourselves when the right thing happens!!!

Many are bringing up the fact that good research is often rejected by top journals! Thaler pointed out on X recent Nobel winning med work was rejected by #Nature & #Science! But does knowledge of this cause one to falsely believe their work is good when rejected by top journals? Self-serving bias?

So the other place is meant to be a safe place unlike X? I’m still figuring out whether I should shut down my X account, do we have a norm to follow, fellow other placers?