The Court's position on LGBTQ rights cases is "what legal rule can we apply in order to ensure that the LGBTQ people lose"

If you are Sam Alito, every case is a chance to uncork some demented pro-Trump conspiracy theories about mail-in voting

The only "expert opinions" the conservative justices care about are their own

Do not let the Supreme Court's diligent advocacy for Donald Trump distract you from the Supreme Court's perpetual skepticism of the rights of criminal defendants

For the conservative justices, "scientific debate" means whatever is best for their preferred policy agenda

The case of a person who might have to spend decades in prison is basically a chance for the justices to do some interesting thought experiments

The simplest way to understand the Supreme Court's policy agenda is to look at how conservative activists are framing the cases that will come before the justices this fall

The Supreme Court opened its new term by doing what it does best: acting openly skeptical of the rights of criminal defendants

Antonin Scalia had nothing but contempt for Anthony Kennedy, and yet Kennedy is still cranking out credulous Scalia hagiography in his new memoir

Even in Supreme Court justice-adjusted terms, it is incredible how wrong Brett Kavanaugh manages to be about basic reality

Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Chiles v. Salazar, a case about whether the First Amendment protects licensed counselors' free speech right to tell their LGBTQ clients to "pray away the gay"

This guy will never run out of ways to embarrass himself in public

Finally, a Supreme Court justice is taking notice of the real crisis of our time

Come, let us together watch some of the corniest videos the right-wing YouTube channel universe has to offer

"Immigration agents all follow the rules and are very polite," says Brett Kavanaugh, a man who apparently does not have access to the internet

The really remarkable part of this story is that Anthony Kennedy thinks anyone gives a shit what he has to say about anything anymore

To win their cases, all conservative activists have to do is tell a story they know Neil Gorsuch wants to hear, and trust him to lap it up

For the conservative legal movement, no right is more sacred than bigots' "free speech" right to discriminate

Want to know where the Supreme Court's conservative supermajority is headed next? Just open YouTube

The Supreme Court's "Trump can do whatever he wants, except mess with the Fed, for reasons" jurisprudence continues apace

Conservative interest groups are trying to rewrite the First Amendment to elevate their religious beliefs above everything else

We are all trying to find the guy who did this

Another year, another Alliance Defending Freedom-sponsored Supreme Court case asking for a legal right to hurt LGBTQ people

"What Rehnquist understood is that within the conservative legal movement, the way to get power is not to hide who you are. It is to put who you are fully on display, and trust that the right people will notice."

"In the past, defying court orders would have disqualified a lawyer from consideration for a judgeship. But for Trump and the MAGA movement, it’s their ticket to ride."

Here are some stories about what a racist little freak William Rehnquist was

The best originalism Brett Kavanaugh has ever done is the opinion where he just admits "I think this is how things should be"

Right-wing activists who are not on the Supreme Court are asking right-wing activists who ARE on the Supreme Court for a First Amendment right to hurt LGBTQ kids

Trump's DOJ is basically replacing the entire federal criminal code with a law that's like "did you do something that made Mister Trump upset"

Nothing says "I am a Supreme Court justice who adheres faithfully to the law as it is written" like appealing directly to "common sense"

The purpose of Trump's DOJ is basically to punish people he considers his political enemies

The normal person's definition of "corruption" looks nothing like the narrow, technical one that the Supreme Court has carved out

There is no crime more serious right now than being someone who once made Donald Trump upset

The most honest originalism coming out of the Supreme Court is its decisions that are based mostly on what the justices FEEL the law should be

Do they not teach the First Amenment in Florida, or what. Actually don't answer that

There is a long, dumb history of Supreme Court justices simply making things up

Only the Supreme Court could have a hard time answering questions like "Is it illegal to take $50,000 bribes stuffed in a luch bag?"

Trump's nominees know exactly what to say in order to get the Republican votes they need

Legal questions that used to be uncomplicated are now...not so much

For the Supreme Court's conservatives, "precedent" matters until the moment their favorite president orders them to overrule it

"In the past, defying court orders would have disqualified a lawyer from consideration for a judgeship. But for Trump and the MAGA movement, it’s their ticket to ride."

The conservative justices are running out of ways to make clear they don't give a shit about anything other than what Trump wants

Almost as if they don't care about it or think it's real

Why do Trump's nominees keep having a hard time saying that presidents can't use the military to kill their political opponents?

Federal judge to Trump: Please get this embarrassing dreck out of my courtroom immediately

When a federal judge talks about having to "endure" reading your writing, you did a bad job

During their confirmation hearings, Trump's judicial nominees are talking about Obergefell v. Hodges the same way Brett Kavanaugh talked about Roe v. Wade

Wow, another Republican lawmaker getting an electoral assist from John Roberts, who could have seen this coming

If you are a Trump judicial nominee, there are some things you just can't say

A core project of the conservative legal movement is bringing back a lightly sanitized version of school segregation