SCOTUSGate
@scotusgate.bsky.social
📤 565
📥 2116
📝 1076
Tracking new Supreme Court petitions. Currently a work in progress. From
@denniscrouch.bsky.social
.
Can Exxon sue Cuban state companies in U.S. courts? The Court will decide in Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Corporación Cimex whether the Helms-Burton Act strips foreign sovereign immunity or if the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act still applies.
loading . . .
Exxon vs. Cuba: Does Helms-Burton Override Sovereign Immunity?
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Exxon Mobil's suit against Cuban state entities, testing whether the Helms-Burton Act independently waives foreign sovereign immunity.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=exxon-vs-cuba-does-helms-burton-override
about 7 hours ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. Barbara, a case asking whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause guarantees birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents without lawful status. A ruling is expected by late June.
loading . . .
Trump v. Barbara: Birthright Citizenship Argued Before the Court
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on April 1, 2026, in Trump v. Barbara, testing whether an executive order limiting birthright citizenship comports with the Fourteenth Amendment.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=trump-v-barbara-birthright-citizenship-argued
about 24 hours ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court heard argument in Cisco Systems Inc v Doe I, a case asking whether the Alien Tort Statute permits aiding-and-abetting claims and, if so, what mental state plaintiffs must prove. Our analysis breaks down the key issues argued before the Court.
loading . . .
Cisco v. Doe I: ATS Aiding-and-Abetting Claims Argued at High Court
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Cisco v. Doe I, testing whether the Alien Tort Statute permits aiding-and-abetting liability and what mens rea standard applies.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=cisco-v-doe-i-ats-aiding-and-abetting-claims
2 days ago
0
0
0
The Court heard argument in Monsanto Company v. John L. Durnell, asking whether federal pesticide law blocks state failure-to-warn suits when the EPA has repeatedly rejected the warning at issue and any label change requires EPA approval.
loading . . .
Monsanto v. Durnell: FIFRA Preemption Argued at the Court
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Monsanto v. Durnell, testing whether FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims when EPA has rejected the proposed warning.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=monsanto-v-durnell-fifra-preemption-argued-at-the
2 days ago
0
1
0
Danco Laboratories has filed an emergency stay application with the Supreme Court in Danco Laboratories, LLC v. Louisiana, et al., the ongoing dispute over mifepristone access. SCOTUSGate has the details.
loading . . .
Danco Labs Seeks Emergency Stay in Mifepristone Dispute
Danco Laboratories has applied to Justice Alito for a stay in a Fifth Circuit mifepristone case, drawing a multi-state amicus coalition within days of filing.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=danco-labs-seeks-emergency-stay-in-mifepristone
3 days ago
0
2
0
The Supreme Court has deferred a stay application in Mullin v. Dahlia Doe, a case involving Temporary Protected Status, and consolidated it with a second related case. No question has been identified yet.
loading . . .
Court Defers TPS Stay Application, Consolidates with Second Case
The Supreme Court deferred action on a DHS stay application targeting Second Circuit rulings on Temporary Protected Status, signaling the justices want a coordinated look at both pending applications.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-defers-tps-stay-application-consolidates
4 days ago
0
0
0
17 states have filed an amicus brief supporting a First Amendment challenge to the New Jersey State Bar Association's policy of reserving leadership positions for specific minority groups in Saadeh v. New Jersey State Bar Association.
loading . . .
States Back First Amendment Challenge to Bar Association DEI Set-Asides
A coalition of 18 states filed an amicus brief supporting a cert petition asking whether the First Amendment can override antidiscrimination laws to protect DEI-based leadership quotas.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=states-back-first-amendment-challenge-to-bar
5 days ago
0
0
0
A stay of removal application in Pedro Zarate Pina et al. v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General has been filed and referred to Justice Thomas. SCOTUSGate has the details.
loading . . .
Stay of Removal Application Filed in Zarate Pina Reaches Justice Thomas
Petitioners in Zarate Pina seek an emergency stay of removal from Justice Thomas, raising questions about the Eleventh Circuit's handling of their case.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=stay-of-removal-application-filed-in-zarate-pina
5 days ago
0
0
0
Steven Ward is asking the Supreme Court to emergency stay his D.C. eviction in Ward v. NYT Owner, LLC, arguing the case lacked mandatory registration under D.C. Code 16-1501 at the time it was filed, which he says is a jurisdictional defect.
loading . . .
Ward Seeks Emergency Stay of D.C. Eviction at Supreme Court
Steven Ward has applied to the Chief Justice for a stay of eviction, raising subject-matter jurisdiction and due process questions about a D.C. housing court judgment.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=ward-seeks-emergency-stay-of-dc-eviction-at
6 days ago
0
0
0
The Court declined to hear Johnson v. United States, leaving a circuit split unresolved on whether police need a warrant to use a drug-sniffing dog in an apartment building's common areas. The Fourth Amendment question remains unsettled.
loading . . .
Court Denies Cert in Apartment Dog-Sniff Case, Circuit Split Persists
The Supreme Court declined to resolve whether warrantless dog sniffs at apartment doors violate the Fourth Amendment, leaving a clear circuit split intact.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-cert-in-apartment-dog-sniff-case
6 days ago
0
0
0
New cert petition in Barnes v. United States asks whether a guilty plea cuts off a defendant's right to argue on appeal that the admitted conduct doesn't actually fit the charged offense as a matter of law.
loading . . .
Barnes v. United States: Can a Guilty Plea Waive a Legal-Sufficiency Challenge?
The Supreme Court is considering whether an unconditional guilty plea bars a defendant from later arguing his admitted conduct does not constitute the charged offense.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=barnes-v-united-states-can-a-guilty-plea-waive-a
7 days ago
0
0
0
Duncan v. Bonta is headed toward conference. The case asks whether California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds violates the Second Amendment, and whether forcing owners to surrender lawfully owned property without compensation violates the Takings Clause.
loading . . .
Duncan v. Bonta: Magazine Ban Petition Nears Conference Decision
California's large-capacity magazine ban faces its 15th conference at the Supreme Court, with both sides filing supplemental briefs on Second Amendment and Takings Clause grounds.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=duncan-v-bonta-magazine-ban-petition-nears
7 days ago
0
1
0
Verizon is asking the Supreme Court to decide whether the FCC can impose monetary penalties for data protection failures without a jury trial, raising Seventh Amendment and Article III questions about agency enforcement power.
loading . . .
Verizon Challenges FCC Penalty Authority at the High Court
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in April 2026 on whether the FCC can impose monetary penalties for data-security failures without a jury trial.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=verizon-challenges-fcc-penalty-authority-at-the
8 days ago
0
0
1
James Hitchcock is seeking a stay of execution from Justice Thomas in Hitchcock v. Florida. SCOTUSGate has the details on the application.
loading . . .
Hitchcock Seeks Stay of Execution Before Justice Thomas
James Hitchcock has applied to the Supreme Court for a stay of execution, raising Eighth Amendment and execution protocol questions in a Florida capital case.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=hitchcock-seeks-stay-of-execution-before-justice
8 days ago
0
0
0
The federal government has filed its brief in Cotter Corporation v. Nikki Steiner Mazzocchio, where the Court is being asked whether federal nuclear safety regulations preempt state tort standards of care. The case heads toward conference.
loading . . .
Nuclear Tort Preemption Heads Toward Conference After U.S. Weighs In
The Supreme Court may decide whether federal nuclear safety rules displace state tort standards in Price-Anderson Act suits, with the U.S. now on record.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=nuclear-tort-preemption-heads-toward-conference
9 days ago
0
0
0
The Court declined to hear Broadnax v. Texas, leaving open whether using a Black defendant's rap lyrics at capital sentencing to argue dangerousness to a nearly all-white jury violates due process and equal protection.
loading . . .
Court Denies Cert in Broadnax, Leaving Rap Lyrics Question Open
The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Broadnax v. Texas, declining to address whether rap lyrics used at capital sentencing violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-cert-in-broadnax-leaving-rap-lyrics
9 days ago
0
0
0
The Court has asked the Solicitor General to weigh in on John Doe et al. v. Kathy Hochul et al., a case asking whether state laws that conflict with Title VII's religious accommodation rules can excuse employers from complying with federal law.
loading . . .
Court Invites SG Views on Title VII Religious Accommodation Preemption
The Supreme Court has invited the Solicitor General to weigh in on whether New York's vaccine mandate law conflicts with Title VII's religious accommodation requirements.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-invites-sg-views-on-title-vii-religious
10 days ago
0
0
0
The Court heard oral argument in United States v. Hemani, testing whether the federal ban on gun possession by unlawful drug users survives Second Amendment scrutiny under the historical tradition framework from Bruen. Our analysis breaks down what the justices signaled.
loading . . .
Drug Users and Gun Rights: Court Weighs 922(g)(3) After Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard argument in Hemani, testing whether federal law barring drug users from possessing firearms survives Second Amendment scrutiny.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=drug-users-and-gun-rights-court-weighs-922g3
11 days ago
0
0
0
SCOTUS will take up Okello T. Chatrie v. United States, deciding whether geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment and whether evidence obtained from them must be excluded. The case could reshape how police use location data from tech companies.
loading . . .
Geofence Warrants and the Fourth Amendment: Chatrie Heads to SCOTUS
The Supreme Court will decide whether geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment and whether the exclusionary rule applies to evidence derived from them.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=geofence-warrants-and-the-fourth-amendment
12 days ago
0
2
1
The Court will consider whether a generic drugmaker can be liable for induced infringement when its label carves out a patented use but its marketing references the branded drug. Hikma v. Amarin could reshape how skinny labels work in patent litigation.
loading . . .
Hikma v. Amarin: Can a Skinny Label Shield a Generic from Infringement?
The Supreme Court will decide whether a generic drugmaker's "skinny label" carve-out shields it from induced infringement liability when its marketing references the branded drug.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=hikma-v-amarin-can-a-skinny-label-shield-a
12 days ago
0
0
0
New cert petition asks whether employers must prove an accommodation would actually cause undue hardship under Title VII, or just that they reasonably believed it would. Petersen v. Snohomish Regional Fire and Rescue could reshape how religious accommodation claims are litigated.
loading . . .
Petersen v. Snohomish: How Much Must Employers Prove on Undue Hardship?
A new Title VII petition asks whether employers must show actual undue hardship to deny religious accommodations, or merely a reasonable belief that hardship would result.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=petersen-v-snohomish-how-much-must-employers
13 days ago
0
0
0
Norfolk Southern is back at the Supreme Court challenging Pennsylvania's registration-based jurisdiction. The case asks whether forcing out-of-state companies to consent to general jurisdiction as a condition of doing business in a state violates the Constitution.
loading . . .
Norfolk Southern Returns to Court Over Registration-Based Jurisdiction
Norfolk Southern petitions the Supreme Court to revisit whether Pennsylvania can assert jurisdiction over out-of-state companies on unrelated claims solely because they registered to do business there.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=norfolk-southern-returns-to-court-over
13 days ago
0
0
0
Gator's Custom Guns v. Washington has now been relisted 14 times at conference. The Court still hasn't acted on whether large-capacity magazines qualify as "Arms" protected under the Second Amendment's plain text.
loading . . .
Large-Capacity Magazine Case Lingers at Conference After 14 Relists
Gator's Custom Guns v. Washington asks whether magazines holding more than ten rounds are "Arms" under the Second Amendment, after 14 conference distributions.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=large-capacity-magazine-case-lingers-at
14 days ago
0
0
0
Calvin Gary Walker v. Texas is before Justice Alito on an emergency stay application in a Texas habeas case. SCOTUSGate has the details on what Walker is asking for and what comes next.
loading . . .
Walker Seeks Emergency Stay from Justice Alito in Texas Habeas Case
Calvin Gary Walker has applied to Justice Alito for a stay in a Fifth Circuit case touching double jeopardy, prosecutorial estoppel, and community supervision revocation.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=walker-seeks-emergency-stay-from-justice-alito-in
14 days ago
0
0
0
Aparna Vashisht-Rota has asked Justice Kagan for an emergency stay in Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, a bankruptcy discharge dispute now before the Supreme Court as Application No. 25A1166.
loading . . .
Vashisht-Rota Seeks Emergency Stay from Justice Kagan in Bankruptcy Discharge Dispute
A pro se applicant asks Justice Kagan to halt enforcement of a defamation judgment, raising questions about the "willful and malicious injury" standard under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6).
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=vashisht-rota-seeks-emergency-stay-from-justice
15 days ago
0
1
0
SCOTUS will hear St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, a case over whether Colorado can bar a Catholic preschool from a state funding program because it follows Catholic teachings on admission and conduct. Cert granted this term.
loading . . .
Supreme Court Grants Cert in Colorado Catholic Preschool Funding Dispute
The Court will decide whether Colorado's exclusion of Catholic preschools from its universal preschool program violates the Free Exercise Clause.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=supreme-court-grants-cert-in-colorado-catholic
15 days ago
0
0
1
An emergency stay application has been filed with Justice Alito in Broadnax v. Texas, seeking to halt the execution of James Garfield Broadnax. SCOTUSGate has the details on the application.
loading . . .
Broadnax Execution Stay Application Filed with Justice Alito
James Garfield Broadnax seeks a stay of execution from the Supreme Court, with his application submitted to Justice Alito on April 20, 2026.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=broadnax-execution-stay-application-filed-with
16 days ago
0
0
0
SCOTUS declined to hear Priscilla Villarreal v. Isidro R. Alaniz, but Sotomayor dissented, arguing the Court should have taken up whether arresting a journalist for asking officials questions and publishing their answers violates the First Amendment.
loading . . .
Villarreal Cert Denied, but Sotomayor Dissents on Press Freedom
The Court declined to hear a First Amendment case involving the arrest of a citizen journalist, with Justice Sotomayor dissenting from the denial.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=villarreal-cert-denied-but-sotomayor-dissents-on
17 days ago
0
0
0
New emergency application asks whether IDEA's stay-put provision is a mandatory self-executing injunction or whether courts retain discretion to balance equities. Shawanda Solomon v. Anna Independent School District tests the reach of Honig v. Doe.
loading . . .
Emergency Stay-Put Application Tests IDEA's Mandatory Injunction Rule
A parent seeks emergency relief at SCOTUS after lower courts declined to enforce the IDEA's stay-put provision, raising questions about judicial discretion and procedural gaps.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=emergency-stay-put-application-tests-ideas
18 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court will consider whether the FCC's power to impose and enforce monetary fines runs afoul of the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial and Article III. The case, Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc., could reshape how the agency penalizes companies.
loading . . .
FCC Forfeiture Powers Face Seventh Amendment Test at High Court
The Supreme Court will decide whether FCC monetary forfeiture procedures satisfy the Seventh Amendment and Article III, with AT&T and Verizon challenging agency enforcement authority.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=fcc-forfeiture-powers-face-seventh-amendment-test
19 days ago
0
0
0
Trump v. Carroll has now been distributed for conference seven times with no action from the Court. Our latest analysis looks at what the repeated relisting may signal and what questions the justices would face if they grant cert.
loading . . .
Trump v. Carroll: Seven Conferences and Still Waiting
The Supreme Court has rescheduled Trump's cert petition in the Carroll defamation case seven times, raising questions about the Court's appetite for the evidentiary issues presented.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=trump-v-carroll-seven-conferences-and-still
20 days ago
0
0
0
SCOTUS has been asked to decide whether federal courts can hear First Amendment challenges to state investigatory demands when a group claims its rights are being chilled. First Choice Women's Resource Centers v. Davenport, No. 24-781, is awaiting a decision on cert.
loading . . .
Federal Courts and First Amendment Chill: First Choice Awaits Decision
The Supreme Court heard argument in Dec. 2025 on whether federal courts must yield to state court when a subpoena target asserts a First Amendment chill.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=federal-courts-and-first-amendment-chill-first
20 days ago
0
1
1
Rocklin Unified School District v. Public Employment Relations Board asks the Court to decide whether a state labor board can invalidate a school policy requiring parents to be notified when their child seeks to socially transition their gender.
loading . . .
Rocklin School District Asks Court to Review Parental Notification Policy
A California school district petitions the Supreme Court to review whether a state labor board can invalidate a policy requiring parental notice when students socially transition.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=rocklin-school-district-asks-court-to-review
21 days ago
0
0
0
The Littlejohn v. School Board of Leon County petition has been rescheduled again. The case asks whether public schools violate parental rights by secretly facilitating a child's gender transition without notifying parents.
loading . . .
Littlejohn Petition Rescheduled Again as Court Eyes Parental Rights
The Supreme Court has repeatedly rescheduled Littlejohn v. School Board of Leon County, signaling close attention to a parental rights and executive-conduct standard dispute.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=littlejohn-petition-rescheduled-again-as-court
22 days ago
0
0
0
Triumph Foods LLC et al v Andrea J Campbell brings a new challenge to Massachusetts' pork production law. The case asks whether the state law is preempted by federal meat inspection rules and whether it violates the dormant Commerce Clause.
loading . . .
Triumph Foods Challenges Massachusetts Pork Law at SCOTUS
Pork producers petition SCOTUS to review whether Massachusetts' farm animal confinement law is preempted by federal meat inspection law or violates the dormant Commerce Clause.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=triumph-foods-challenges-massachusetts-pork-law
22 days ago
0
0
0
SCOTUS declined to hear Timothy Barton v. Securities and Exchange Commission, leaving in place rulings from parallel criminal and civil enforcement actions the government brought against Barton over alleged securities law violations tied to real estate development loans.
loading . . .
SCOTUS Denies Review in Barton Asset Seizure Case
The Court declined to hear a Fifth Circuit case asking whether the SEC can seize an entire company's assets based on minimal contact with disputed funds.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=scotus-denies-review-in-barton-asset-seizure-case
23 days ago
0
0
0
A coalition of states and labor groups has filed briefs supporting TPS holders in Trump v. Miot at the Supreme Court. The case could affect hundreds of thousands of people currently protected under Temporary Protected Status.
loading . . .
States and Labor Groups Rally Around TPS Holders at High Court
Five amicus briefs filed in Trump v. Miot signal broad opposition to the administration's effort to terminate Temporary Protected Status for Haitian nationals.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=states-and-labor-groups-rally-around-tps-holders
23 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court declined to hear Schoenthal v. Raoul, leaving in place Illinois' ban on carrying firearms on public transit. The Second Amendment challenge to the law will not be reviewed this term.
loading . . .
Court Denies Review of Illinois Public Transit Firearms Ban
The Supreme Court declined to hear a Second Amendment challenge to Illinois' ban on carrying firearms on public transportation, leaving the Seventh Circuit's ruling intact.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-review-of-illinois-public-transit
24 days ago
0
0
0
The Court is considering whether employees at federally funded schools can sue under Title IX for sex discrimination at work. Thomas Crowther et al. v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia asks whether that private right of action exists.
loading . . .
Title IX Employment Claims: Court Eyes Private Right of Action
The Supreme Court is weighing whether to take up a Title IX case asking if university employees can sue for sex discrimination in employment.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=title-ix-employment-claims-court-eyes-private
24 days ago
0
0
0
The Court declined to hear Amber Lavigne v. Great Salt Bay Community School Board, a case where a mother alleged her child's school secretly socially transitioned her 13-year-old without parental consent. A Twombly pleading standard split goes unresolved.
loading . . .
Court Denies Review in Parental Rights Case Raising Twombly Split
The Supreme Court declined to hear Lavigne v. Great Salt Bay, leaving intact a First Circuit ruling that dismissed a parent's claims over school gender transition practices.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-review-in-parental-rights-case
25 days ago
0
0
0
The Court declined to hear Upsolve Inc et al v Letitia James, leaving intact New York's unauthorized practice of law rules as applied to Upsolve's free legal advice service. The First Amendment question on content-neutrality remains unresolved.
loading . . .
Court Denies Cert in Upsolve First Amendment Challenge to UPL Rules
The Supreme Court declined to hear Upsolve's challenge to New York's unauthorized practice of law rules, leaving open a key First Amendment content-neutrality question.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-cert-in-upsolve-first-amendment
26 days ago
0
0
0
New cert petition asks whether the government owes compensation when it damages private property under its police power. The circuits are split 3-3, and Hadley v. City of South Bend, Indiana asks the Court to resolve it.
loading . . .
Hadley v. South Bend: Does the Takings Clause Have a Police Power Exception?
A new cert petition asks whether the government owes compensation when police intentionally destroy an innocent person's property while pursuing a fugitive.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=hadley-v-south-bend-does-the-takings-clause-have
26 days ago
0
0
0
New cert petition asks whether the government must pay when police destroy an innocent person's property while chasing a fugitive. Pena v. City of Los Angeles raises whether the Takings Clause requires compensation or if "public necessity" blocks recovery.
loading . . .
Pena v. Los Angeles: Must Government Pay When Police Destroy Property?
A new cert petition asks whether the Takings Clause requires compensation when police intentionally destroy an innocent person's property while pursuing a fugitive.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=pena-v-los-angeles-must-government-pay-when
27 days ago
0
0
0
Charles L. Burton, Jr. v. John Q. Hamm has ended at the Supreme Court after the death penalty stay application was withdrawn. Burton had sought to halt his execution in Alabama.
loading . . .
Burton Death Penalty Stay Application Withdrawn at Supreme Court
Charles Burton's emergency stay application before Justice Thomas was withdrawn days after submission, ending a brief but notable capital case appearance at SCOTUS.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=burton-death-penalty-stay-application-withdrawn
28 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court has declined to hear Alicia Stroble v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, leaving open whether Oklahoma can tax income earned by a Muscogee Nation citizen living and working on the Muscogee Reservation after McGirt v. Oklahoma confirmed its Indian country status.
loading . . .
Court Denies Review in McGirt Tribal Income Tax Case
The Supreme Court declined to hear Stroble v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, leaving unresolved whether Oklahoma may tax income earned by tribal citizens on the Muscogee Reservation.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-review-in-mcgirt-tribal-income-tax
28 days ago
0
0
0
The Court heard argument in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, testing whether Congress can cap how much political parties spend on ads made in coordination with their own candidates.
loading . . .
Party Spending Limits Face First Amendment Test After Oral Argument
The Supreme Court heard argument in Dec. 2025 on whether federal limits on coordinated party expenditures violate the First Amendment, with a decision expected in 2026.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=party-spending-limits-face-first-amendment-test
29 days ago
0
0
0
Samuel Ronan et al. v. Frank LaRose is an Ohio ballot access dispute that has reached Justice Kavanaugh. SCOTUSGate has the details on what's being asked of the Court.
loading . . .
Ohio Ballot Access Fight Reaches Justice Kavanaugh
Applicants seek an emergency injunction pending appeal in an Ohio primary ballot access dispute, with Justice Kavanaugh requesting a response by April 8, 2026.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=ohio-ballot-access-fight-reaches-justice-kavanaugh
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
The Court will consider whether the Helms-Burton Act alone is enough to sue Cuban state entities in U.S. courts, or whether plaintiffs must also clear the separate hurdles of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. No. 24-699.
loading . . .
Exxon v. Cimex: Does Helms-Burton Override Sovereign Immunity?
The Supreme Court heard argument in Feb. 2026 on whether the Helms-Burton Act independently waives foreign sovereign immunity for Cuban instrumentalities.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=exxon-v-cimex-does-helms-burton-override
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
New cert petition asks SCOTUS to review how the Second Circuit applied Central Hudson to a New York law banning dietary supplement sales to minors. The case is Council For Responsible Nutrition v. Letitia James, No. 25-1145.
loading . . .
Second Circuit's Lax Central Hudson Review Draws Cert Petition
A dietary supplement trade group asks the Court to clarify how rigorously courts must apply the Central Hudson commercial speech test when states restrict product marketing to minors.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=second-circuits-lax-central-hudson-review-draws
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court will decide whether federal law blocks state climate lawsuits in Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County. Boulder County sued oil companies under state law for climate-related harms. The question is whether federal law forecloses those claims.
loading . . .
Supreme Court Takes Up Federal Preemption of State Climate Claims
The Court granted cert in Suncor v. Boulder County to decide whether federal law bars state tort claims over global greenhouse-gas emissions.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=supreme-court-takes-up-federal-preemption-of
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
Load more
feeds!
log in