SCOTUSGate
@scotusgate.bsky.social
📤 618
📥 2116
📝 1215
Tracking new Supreme Court petitions. Currently a work in progress. From
@denniscrouch.bsky.social
.
The Supreme Court is being asked to clarify when zoning laws cross the line under RLUIPA. Missionaries of Saint John the Baptist v. Joel Frederic raises whether blocking a church from building on its own land is a substantial burden on religious exercise.
loading . . .
RLUIPA Substantial Burden and Equal Terms Questions Reach High Court
A Kentucky zoning dispute over a religious building permit raises two unresolved RLUIPA questions now pending before the Supreme Court.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=rluipa-substantial-burden-and-equal-terms
about 20 hours ago
0
0
0
The Court has invited the Solicitor General to weigh in on RNC v. Eakin, a case asking whether mail voting rules imposing ordinary burdens on voters survive constitutional review under the Anderson-Burdick framework.
loading . . .
RNC v. Eakin: Solicitor General Called to Weigh In on Mail Voting Rules
The Supreme Court has invited the Solicitor General to file a brief in a Pennsylvania mail-voting dispute that could reshape the Anderson-Burdick framework.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=rnc-v-eakin-solicitor-general-called-to-weigh-in
1 day ago
0
0
0
The Court will take up Republican National Committee v. Mi Familia Vota, examining whether federal law blocks Arizona from requiring proof of citizenship on state voter registration forms.
loading . . .
Court Grants Review in Arizona Citizenship Voter Registration Case
The Supreme Court will decide whether the NVRA preempts Arizona's documentary proof-of-citizenship requirement and its 90-day pre-election voter roll cancellation program.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-grants-review-in-arizona-citizenship-voter
2 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court will hear Apple v. Epic Games, taking up when courts can hold parties in civil contempt. At issue: whether contempt can rest on an injunction's "spirit" rather than its explicit terms, and related limits on courts' equitable authority.
loading . . .
Supreme Court Takes Up Civil Contempt Standards in Apple v. Epic
The Court granted cert on whether contempt requires a clear injunction violation, rejecting the Ninth Circuit's "spirit" standard in Apple v. Epic Games.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=supreme-court-takes-up-civil-contempt-standards
2 days ago
0
0
0
Emergency application now at the Supreme Court in Students Engaged in Advancing Texas v. Ken Paxton, challenging a Texas law restricting student speech. The Court has not yet identified the question presented. SCOTUSGate has the details.
loading . . .
Texas Student Speech Law Faces Emergency Application at High Court
Students challenge Texas Senate Bill 2420 at the Supreme Court, arguing the law imposes an unconstitutional content-based restriction on student speech.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=texas-student-speech-law-faces-emergency
3 days ago
0
0
0
The Court will take up whether the Second Amendment protects the right to own AR-15s and other semiautomatic rifles. Eddie Grant Jr. v. Higgins will be consolidated with No. 25-238 to decide if bans on the most popular rifle in the country are constitutional.
loading . . .
Court Grants Cert on AR-15 Ban, Consolidates with No. 25-238
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Grant v. Higgins and consolidated it with No. 25-238 to decide whether the Second Amendment protects semiautomatic rifles in common use.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-grants-cert-on-ar-15-ban-consolidates-with
3 days ago
0
0
0
The Court has agreed to hear International Partners for Ethical Care v. Ferguson, a case asking whether parents have standing to challenge Washington's law that limits their role in decisions about their children's gender transition care.
loading . . .
Court Grants Cert on Parental Standing in Washington Gender Transition Case
The Supreme Court will decide whether parents have Article III standing to challenge Washington's gender transition policies that allegedly displace their parental decision-making role.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-grants-cert-on-parental-standing-in
4 days ago
0
0
0
SCOTUS denied cert in National Rifle Association v. Glass after four conferences, leaving in place Florida's law barring 18-to-20-year-olds from buying firearms. The Second Amendment challenge to the age restriction will not be heard this term.
loading . . .
NRA's Florida Age-Restriction Challenge Denied After Four Conferences
The Supreme Court declined to hear the NRA's challenge to Florida's ban on firearm purchases by 18-to-20-year-olds, leaving the Eleventh Circuit's ruling intact.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=nras-florida-age-restriction-challenge-denied
4 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court declined to hear Thomas Joseph Powell et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, leaving in place the SEC rule that bars defendants in settled enforcement actions from denying the allegations against them.
loading . . .
Court Denies Review of SEC Gag Rule First Amendment Challenge
The Supreme Court declined to hear a First Amendment challenge to the SEC's settlement "gag rule," leaving the Ninth Circuit's ruling intact.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-review-of-sec-gag-rule-first
5 days ago
0
0
0
The Court will consider whether Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause bar states from limiting girls' sports teams to students assigned female at birth. The case is West Virginia v. B.P.J., and it could affect transgender sports policies nationwide.
loading . . .
West Virginia v. B.P.J.: Court Eyes Transgender Sports Ban
The Supreme Court heard argument in January 2026 on whether Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause permit states to bar transgender girls from girls' sports teams.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=west-virginia-v-bpj-court-eyes-transgender-sports
5 days ago
0
0
0
St. Mary Catholic Parish has asked SCOTUS to review whether Colorado can bar a religious preschool from its universal preschool program for following Catholic teaching on staffing and enrollment. The case could clarify when states may exclude religious schools from public benefit programs.
loading . . .
St. Mary Parish Challenges Colorado's Preschool Exclusion at SCOTUS
The Supreme Court will decide whether Colorado's exclusion of Catholic preschools from a publicly funded program violates the Free Exercise Clause.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=st-mary-parish-challenges-colorados-preschool
6 days ago
0
0
0
The Court declined to hear National Shooting Sports Foundation v. Letitia James, leaving in place a ruling that New York's arms statute qualifies as a PLCAA predicate exception, allowing suits against firearms industry members under state law.
loading . . .
Court Denies Review in PLCAA Predicate Exception Dispute
The Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to New York's firearms liability law, leaving unresolved a circuit split over the PLCAA's predicate exception.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-review-in-plcaa-predicate-exception
7 days ago
0
1
0
The Court may take up Shelby v. Manning to address whether the Tenth Circuit applied qualified immunity too broadly by failing to define clearly established law with sufficient specificity. The case stems from the 2016 fatal shooting of Terence Crutcher by a Tulsa officer.
loading . . .
Shelby v. Manning: Qualified Immunity Specificity Returns to the Court
A new cert petition asks whether the Tenth Circuit applied qualified immunity too broadly by failing to define clearly established law with sufficient specificity.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=shelby-v-manning-qualified-immunity-specificity
8 days ago
0
1
0
The Supreme Court has received an emergency application in Computer & Communications Industry Association v. Ken Paxton, challenging Texas's age-verification law for adult websites. SCOTUSGate has analysis of what's at stake.
loading . . .
Texas Age-Verification Law Heads to Supreme Court on Emergency Application
CCIA seeks emergency relief from the Fifth Circuit's ruling upholding Texas's age-verification and parental-consent law for online platforms.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=texas-age-verification-law-heads-to-supreme-court
9 days ago
0
0
0
The Court has invited the Solicitor General to weigh in on The GEO Group v. Nwauzor, which asks whether a state can apply its minimum wage law to federal immigration detainees in a work program run by a private contractor at a federal facility.
loading . . .
Court Invites SG's Views on State Minimum Wage for Federal Detainees
The Supreme Court asked the Solicitor General to weigh in on whether Washington State can apply its minimum-wage law to federal immigration detainees in a private detention facility.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-invites-sgs-views-on-state-minimum-wage-for
10 days ago
0
0
0
Justice Thomas has called for a response in Moore v. Senate Majority PAC, a stay application before the Court. No. 25A1396. The question presented has not yet been identified.
loading . . .
Justice Thomas Calls for Response in Moore Stay Application
Roy Moore seeks emergency relief from the Eleventh Circuit; Justice Thomas has requested a response from Senate Majority PAC by June 25.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=justice-thomas-calls-for-response-in-moore-stay
10 days ago
0
0
0
The Court has asked the Solicitor General to weigh in on Saadeh v. New Jersey State Bar Association, which asks whether the First Amendment shields a bar association's minority-only leadership set-asides from state antidiscrimination law.
loading . . .
Court Invites SG Views on First Amendment Defense for DEI Set-Asides
The Supreme Court has asked the Solicitor General to weigh in on whether the First Amendment shields bar association DEI leadership quotas from state antidiscrimination law.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-invites-sg-views-on-first-amendment-defense
11 days ago
0
0
0
The Court declined to hear RMS of Georgia LLC dba Choice Refrigerants v. Environmental Protection Agency, leaving in place EPA rules that control who can participate in the refrigerant market. The nondelegation challenge to that authority will not get a hearing.
loading . . .
Court Denies Cert in Nondelegation Challenge to Refrigerant Market Rules
The Supreme Court declined to hear a nondelegation challenge to EPA authority over the hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant market, leaving intact a D.C. Circuit ruling.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-cert-in-nondelegation-challenge-to
12 days ago
0
0
0
New cert petition asks whether Kisor v. Wilkie changed the deference courts owe to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines commentary, potentially reshaping how judges apply the Guidelines in criminal sentencing nationwide.
loading . . .
Poore v. United States: Deference to Sentencing Guidelines Commentary
The Court has distributed Poore v. United States eleven times, signaling close attention to whether Kisor and Loper Bright limit deference to Sentencing Commission commentary.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=poore-v-united-states-deference-to-sentencing
12 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court will take up Guerrero v. Dexter Johnson, examining what "previously unavailable" means under AEDPA's narrow exceptions for successive habeas petitions filed by state prisoners. The case could affect how death row inmates bring new constitutional claims.
loading . . .
Court Takes Up "Previously Unavailable" Standard for Successive Habeas
The Supreme Court will resolve a circuit split over when a claim based on a new constitutional rule counts as "previously unavailable" under AEDPA's successive habeas bar.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-takes-up-previously-unavailable-standard
13 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Thomas Crowther et al. v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, which asks whether Title IX allows employees at federally funded schools to sue for sex discrimination in employment.
loading . . .
Title IX's Employment Reach: Supreme Court Takes Up Employee Suits
The Court granted cert in Crowther v. Board of Regents to decide whether Title IX gives employees a private right of action for sex discrimination in employment.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=title-ixs-employment-reach-supreme-court-takes-up
13 days ago
0
1
1
The Court has now conferenced National Association for Gun Rights v. Lamont multiple times without acting. The case challenges Connecticut's ban on AR-15-style rifles and magazines over 10 rounds under the Second Amendment. Will the justices take it up?
loading . . .
Connecticut Assault Weapons Ban Keeps Returning to Conference
The Supreme Court has now distributed NAGR v. Lamont for conference 16 times, signaling the justices are watching related litigation before deciding whether to grant certiorari.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=connecticut-assault-weapons-ban-keeps-returning
14 days ago
0
0
0
Chicago firefighters and city workers are asking the Supreme Court to take up a challenge to the city's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, Scott Troogstad et al. v. City of Chicago, Illinois, asks whether the requirement violated substantive due process rights.
loading . . .
Chicago Vaccine Mandate Reaches Supreme Court in Substantive Due Process Challenge
Chicago city employees petition SCOTUS to review whether a COVID-19 vaccine mandate as a condition of employment violated substantive due process rights.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=chicago-vaccine-mandate-reaches-supreme-court-in
16 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court has declined to hear Pauline Newman v. Kimberly A. Moore, leaving in place the Federal Circuit's disability proceedings against Judge Newman without addressing whether courts can review allegedly ultra vires acts under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act.
loading . . .
Court Denies Newman's Bid to Challenge Federal Circuit Disability Proceedings
The Supreme Court declined to hear Judge Pauline Newman's challenge to the Federal Circuit's judicial council proceedings, leaving key questions about § 357(c)'s scope unresolved.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-newmans-bid-to-challenge-federal
16 days ago
0
0
0
New cert petition: BMG Rights Management US LLC v. Cyril E. Vetter asks the Court to resolve whether U.S. copyright termination rights revert only domestic copyrights or extend to foreign ones too. The Fifth Circuit broke from other courts in ruling the reversion reaches worldwide.
loading . . .
BMG Rights Management Asks Court to Limit Copyright Termination to U.S.
BMG petitions the Supreme Court to reverse a Fifth Circuit ruling that U.S. copyright termination rights extend to foreign copyrights worldwide, not just domestic ones.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=bmg-rights-management-asks-court-to-limit
17 days ago
0
0
0
The U.S. government has filed a brief in John Doe v. Hochul, arguing over whether New York's religious accommodation law conflicts with Title VII. At issue: can state law create an "undue hardship" that lets employers skip federal religious accommodation duties?
loading . . .
United States Weighs In on Title VII vs. New York Religious Accommodation Law
The federal government has filed an amicus brief in Doe v. Hochul, urging the Court to consider whether New York law impermissibly conflicts with Title VII's religious accommodation mandate.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=united-states-weighs-in-on-title-vii-vs-new-york
18 days ago
0
0
0
The Solicitor General has filed a brief in Wells Pharma of Houston v. Zyla Life Sciences, addressing whether the FDCA preempts state unfair competition and consumer protection claims tied to marketing compounded drugs without premarket approval.
loading . . .
Solicitor General Weighs In on FDCA Preemption of State Drug-Marketing Claims
The U.S. government's amicus brief in Wells Pharma v. Zyla Life Sciences may shape whether the Court takes up FDCA preemption of state unfair competition claims.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=solicitor-general-weighs-in-on-fdca-preemption-of
19 days ago
1
1
0
SCOTUS has been asked to decide whether federal law blocks state climate liability suits against oil companies. In Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, Colorado counties sued over greenhouse gas damages. The question: does federal law preempt those state claims?
loading . . .
Climate Liability Comes to the Court: Suncor and Federal Preemption
The Supreme Court will decide whether federal law bars state tort claims over global climate harms, with 57 amici weighing in.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=climate-liability-comes-to-the-court-suncor-and
20 days ago
0
1
0
The Court will consider whether Congress can let the Labor Secretary handle initial adjudication of H-2A visa violation claims against employers, or whether Article III requires those proceedings to go before a federal judge. Case: Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards.
loading . . .
Court Takes Up Article III Limits on Labor Department Adjudication
The Supreme Court will decide whether Congress may assign H-2A visa enforcement proceedings to the Secretary of Labor, testing the boundaries of the public rights doctrine.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-takes-up-article-iii-limits-on-labor
21 days ago
0
0
0
SCOTUS will consider whether the Veterans' Judicial Review Act removed district courts' power to hear constitutional challenges to veterans' benefits laws, a question that traces back to the Court's 1974 ruling in Johnson v. Robison.
loading . . .
Veterans' Benefits and District Court Jurisdiction Head to SCOTUS
The Court will decide whether the Veterans' Judicial Review Act eliminated district court jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenges to veterans' benefits statutes.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=veterans-benefits-and-district-court-jurisdiction
22 days ago
0
1
0
The Court is taking another look at National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, which asks whether Congress can limit how much political parties spend on campaign ads coordinated with their own candidates.
loading . . .
Party Spending Limits Return to the Court After Post-Argument Briefing
The Supreme Court considers whether federal limits on coordinated party expenditures violate the First Amendment, with supplemental briefing continuing after December 2025 oral argument.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=party-spending-limits-return-to-the-court-after
22 days ago
0
0
0
SCOTUS declined to hear King v. United States, leaving a circuit split unresolved on whether Congress's 2014 law allowing solvent pension plans to cut vested retirement benefits constitutes a taking under the Fifth Amendment.
loading . . .
Court Denies Review in Pension Takings Case, Leaving Circuit Split Intact
The Supreme Court declined to resolve a three-way circuit split over when government-authorized pension reductions constitute a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-review-in-pension-takings-case
23 days ago
0
0
0
Ohio is asking the Supreme Court to weigh in on state power to regulate alcohol imports under the Twenty-first Amendment. At issue in Dave Yost v. Kenneth M. Miller is whether Ohio can require wine suppliers to sell through licensed wholesalers.
loading . . .
Ohio Asks Supreme Court to Clarify State Power Over Alcohol Imports
Ohio's AG petitions SCOTUS to resolve whether the Twenty-first Amendment lets states ban out-of-state retailer shipments and cap personal wine imports.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=ohio-asks-supreme-court-to-clarify-state-power
24 days ago
0
0
0
Griffiths v. Keith has been relisted at conference. The case asks whether an officer must wait until a fleeing armed suspect points his weapon before using deadly force. The Court has now considered the petition multiple times without acting.
loading . . .
Griffiths v. Keith: Fleeing Armed Suspect Case Lingers at Conference
The Court has rescheduled Griffiths v. Keith over a dozen times, raising questions about whether it will take up deadly force and qualified immunity.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=griffiths-v-keith-fleeing-armed-suspect-case
24 days ago
0
0
0
Cutberto Viramontes et al. v. Cook County, Illinois et al. has now been relisted 19 times at conference. The case asks whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semiautomatic rifles.
loading . . .
AR-15 Ban Challenge Lingers at Conference for 19th Time
The Supreme Court has now distributed Viramontes v. Cook County for conference 19 times without acting, raising questions about the Court's appetite for the AR-15 question.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=ar-15-ban-challenge-lingers-at-conference-for
25 days ago
0
0
0
The U.S. has filed a brief in Kingdom of Spain v. Blasket Renewable Investments, a case asking whether courts must verify a foreign sovereign's consent to arbitrate before asserting jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
loading . . .
Spain v. Blasket: U.S. Weighs In on FSIA Arbitration Jurisdiction
The U.S. government filed an amicus brief in a case testing whether courts must verify sovereign consent before asserting FSIA arbitration jurisdiction.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=spain-v-blasket-us-weighs-in-on-fsia-arbitration
26 days ago
0
2
0
Gator's Custom Guns v. Washington has now been relisted 20 times at conference. The Court still hasn't acted on whether high-capacity magazines are "Arms" protected under the Second Amendment's plain text.
loading . . .
High-Capacity Magazine Case Lingers at Conference After 20 Relists
Gator's Custom Guns v. Washington has been distributed for conference over 20 times, signaling the Court is watching related litigation before deciding whether to grant certiorari.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=high-capacity-magazine-case-lingers-at-conference
26 days ago
0
0
0
Duncan v. Bonta has been conferenced multiple times at the Court. The case challenges California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds, raising both Second Amendment and Takings Clause questions. No action yet on whether the Court will take it up.
loading . . .
Duncan v. Bonta: High-Capacity Magazine Ban Faces Repeated Conference
California's large-capacity magazine ban has now been distributed for conference over 20 times, signaling the Court is watching related Second Amendment cases before acting.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=duncan-v-bonta-high-capacity-magazine-ban-faces
27 days ago
1
2
0
The Supreme Court has referred the emergency application in Phillip Callais et al. v. Louisiana et al. to the full Court. The case involves Louisiana redistricting. No question has been identified yet.
loading . . .
Louisiana Redistricting Application Referred to Full Court
The Supreme Court has referred an emergency application in Louisiana's ongoing redistricting dispute to the full Court, keeping pressure on a contested majority-minority congressional district.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=louisiana-redistricting-application-referred-to
27 days ago
0
0
0
Flagstar Bank has petitioned SCOTUS in Flagstar Bank N.A. v. William Kivett et al., asking whether the National Bank Act preempts state laws requiring banks to pay interest on mortgage escrow accounts.
loading . . .
Flagstar Bank Petitions on Mortgage Escrow Interest Preemption
Flagstar Bank asks the Supreme Court to resolve a circuit split over whether the National Bank Act preempts state laws requiring interest payments on mortgage escrow accounts.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=flagstar-bank-petitions-on-mortgage-escrow
28 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court declined to hear United States Conference of Catholic Bishops v. David O'Connell, a case asking whether church autonomy doctrine bars a parishioner's fraud suit over how Peter's Pence donations were described during Mass.
loading . . .
Court Denies Cert in Peter's Pence Church Autonomy Case
The Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to a parishioner's lawsuit over the Catholic Church's Peter's Pence offering, leaving unresolved key questions about church autonomy doctrine.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-cert-in-peters-pence-church-autonomy
29 days ago
0
0
0
A new petition asks the Court to overrule McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, the 1973 framework used in employment discrimination cases. Shelton v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority argues the burden-shifting test conflicts with Title VII's text.
loading . . .
Petition Asks Court to Reconsider McDonnell Douglas Framework
A new cert petition asks the Supreme Court to overrule or clarify the 53-year-old McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting test for employment discrimination claims.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=petition-asks-court-to-reconsider-mcdonnell
30 days ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court is set to consider whether Maine can require lobstermen to install GPS trackers on their boats for 24/7 government monitoring as a condition of keeping their fishing license. The case is Frank Thompson v. Carl Wilson.
loading . . .
Maine GPS Lobster Tracking Case Heads to Conference
The Supreme Court is set to consider whether Maine's mandatory 24/7 GPS surveillance of fishing vessels violates the Fourth Amendment's trespass doctrine.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=maine-gps-lobster-tracking-case-heads-to
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court has vacated a Fifth Circuit stay in Guerrero v. Busby, a Texas execution case. No. 25A1235.
loading . . .
Supreme Court Vacates Fifth Circuit Stay in Texas Execution Case
The Supreme Court granted Texas's application to vacate a Fifth Circuit stay of execution for death-row inmate Edward Lee Busby on May 14, 2026.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=supreme-court-vacates-fifth-circuit-stay-in-texas
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
SCOTUS will consider whether federal pesticide law blocks state failure-to-warn suits over Roundup. In Monsanto Company v. John L. Durnell, the question is whether EPA's repeated rejection of a cancer warning preempts state tort claims requiring that same warning.
loading . . .
Monsanto's Roundup Case Tests FIFRA's Limits on State Failure-to-Warn Claims
The Supreme Court heard argument in Monsanto v. Durnell, testing whether FIFRA preempts state failure-to-warn claims when EPA has rejected the proposed warning.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=monsantos-roundup-case-tests-fifras-limits-on
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
The Supreme Court has stayed a Fifth Circuit order in Danco Laboratories LLC v. Louisiana, blocking the lower court's ruling while the case proceeds. The stay keeps current mifepristone access rules in place for now.
loading . . .
Supreme Court Stays Fifth Circuit Order in Mifepristone Case
The full Court granted Danco Laboratories' stay application on May 14, blocking a Fifth Circuit order in the latest chapter of mifepristone litigation.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=supreme-court-stays-fifth-circuit-order-in
about 1 month ago
0
1
2
The Supreme Court has declined to hear Official Committee of Asbestos Claimants of Bestwall LLC v. Bestwall LLC, leaving in place a ruling that allows a solvent company to use bankruptcy protection even when it can pay all its liabilities now and in the future.
loading . . .
Court Denies Review in Bestwall Solvent-Debtor Bankruptcy Case
The Supreme Court declined to hear whether a financially solvent company can use Chapter 11 to manage asbestos liability, leaving the Fourth Circuit's ruling intact.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-review-in-bestwall-solvent-debtor
about 1 month ago
1
0
0
The Supreme Court declined to hear Rocklin Unified School District v. Public Employment Relations Board, leaving in place a ruling that struck down a school district policy requiring parents to be notified when their child seeks to socially transition their gender.
loading . . .
Court Denies Review in California School District Gender Notification Case
The Supreme Court declined to hear Rocklin Unified's challenge to a California labor board ruling that invalidated its parental notification policy for student gender transitions.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=court-denies-review-in-california-school-district
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
The Court dismissed Hamm v. Smith as improvidently granted. The case asked whether Alabama can require proof of an IQ of 70 or below to establish intellectual disability under Atkins, and how courts should weigh multiple IQ scores in such claims.
loading . . .
Hamm v. Smith: Court Dismisses Atkins IQ Case as Improvidently Granted
The Supreme Court dismissed Hamm v. Smith after oral argument, leaving unresolved how states may apply IQ thresholds in Atkins intellectual disability claims.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=hamm-v-smith-court-dismisses-atkins-iq-case-as
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
New cert petition asks whether employers must prove a religious accommodation would actually cause undue hardship under Title VII, or if a reasonable belief that it would is enough. The case is Petersen v. Snohomish Regional Fire and Rescue.
loading . . .
Title VII Undue Hardship: Actual Burden or Reasonable Belief Enough?
A new cert petition asks whether employers must prove actual undue hardship to defeat Title VII religious accommodation claims, or whether a reasonable belief suffices.
https://scotusgate.com/post.php?slug=title-vii-undue-hardship-actual-burden-or
about 1 month ago
0
0
0
Load more
feeds!
log in